Finally... some movement on this case.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/20/fbi-turns-over-7000-documents-from-weiner-laptop-in-clinton-tied-case.html
Does anyone else find it odd that it's going to take YEARS to review a couple hundred emails per month? Yet, Comey was able to magically dismiss all of this in days upon re-opening the case?
TRUMP! SESSIONS! Wake the fuck up! You are asleep at the wheel.
These are the very SAME people that are dragging you through Russian mud. Shut them down. Blow the lid off.
Pizzagate Related because Weiner is a pedophile, Huma is HRC's right-hand woman, and rumors of "Life Insurance" folders on the laptop that reportedly contain some of the most damaging evidence imaginable.
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we_sure ago
That's exactly right. The life insurance folder was literally just a rumor from someone on twitter. In fact, I think it was actually a joke. But everyone got drunk on confirmation bias and went wild imagining what this could be. It was helped along by a deliberate hoax campaign from Steve Bannon, Erik Prince and TruePundit.
Yeah. Have you notice that we are not talking about 650,000 files here? That's because most of the emails on the laptop had nothing to do with the Clinton case. Also prepping files for public release is much different than what the FBI had to do. The State Department retroactively classifies some items before they are released. It's a different process.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
I'll agree with both of your replies in this case @Are_we_sure...
Healthy skepticism is, well, healthy... and your memory refresher course on the Erik Prince/True Pundit shit post is spot on. That one didn't pass the sniff test.
As for the 650k emails vs. files. I get it. But, aren't these 7,000 documents contained within the 650k emails? The logic doesn't hold up. And even with a program that standardizes/condenses/indexes the 650k emails to scan for key words and phrases... I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that if some pedes got their hands on this raw data, it wouldn't be so innocent.
That's just my $0.02. But, I mostly agree with you.
RweSure ago
The logic doesn't hold up? I'm confused. I'm not making a point of the number of files vs the number of emails. I'm making a point of that the relevant number of emails is some smaller number than 650,000 and greater than 7,000.
Was the total of 650,000 emails ever confirmed? People were acting like that was a evidence of guilt in and of itself, because its a large number.
Not all emails on that laptop would be relevant in the Clinton case, so it's going to be some smaller number. And you don't need to index every word for this. You can start with the To and From Metadata to eliminate the bulk of the emails.
The FBI mentioned the number the needed to look through was far smaller than they first expected. Many of the emails were duplicates of emails they had already reviewed.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Hmmm, yeah, it's tough to trust anything out of James "Let me Perjure Myself Constantly" Comey these days.
But, my bad, I thought you were stating that these were "files" vs. text emails and that's why it's going to take longer.
I just want them to be hosted on Wikileaks FFS. Is that too much to ask?
RweSure ago
Yeah, there's zero instances of Comey committed perjury.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Uhhh... well, there's this quote: ‘I need loyalty, I expect loyalty’ - Which was said by Comey, under oath, disputed by Trump/his lawyers and wasn't reflected in his memo.
Then you have the prior testimony in which Comey stated that there was zero political pressure applied to any of his investigations/decisions... AFTER he had his dinner w/ Trump and accused him of attempting to obstruct justice by "shutting down" the Russian case w/ Flynn... or the eventual discovery that Lynch had him downgrade HRC's email investigation to a "matter". Wouldn't those be 2 instances of "pressure"? He seemed to think so after the fact. And for someone with a memory so incredible that he can write notes AFTER a meeting occurred, so accurately that they are accepted as evidence in an investigation, you'd think he would have remembered those 2 examples.
And this isn't even beginning to dive into the horseshit Jimmy C. was spewing re: the HRC email case itself. No intent? Seriously? You can't sell this bullshit story to anyone with a single functional brain synapse. No intent?! BleachBit, hammer-smashed-blackberries, endless immunity granted, missing/destroyed evidence w/ no charges, fake identities to cover up other politician's involvement, email evidence exposing the rush to delete/move files ASAP. It's the definition of intent.
Only a fully brainwashed leftist/paid shill/mentally challenged animal would ignore that. Because one certainly can't argue it.
RweSure ago
I don't think you've given a single example of perjury.
This is almost certainly false. Where did you get this?
So you're mentioning a bunch of things that didn't involve Clinton. Clinton did not use Hammers or Bleachbit or order anyone to use them. And the people who did them did nothing illegal. Smashing a blackbery with a hammer is certainly not illegal. And it certainly wasn't an attempt to hide evidence. The guy who did it say it only happened after transferring all the data to the new device and that he was very careful to do this. It's the equivalent of digitizing paper records and shredding the papers. You still have the documents. Do you simply throw out your old hard drives without doing anything to them? I make sure you can't play the platters, usually with a drill.
The Bleachbit didn't involve Clinton either.
What's the missing destroyed evidence and what would make it illegal? Because you are conflating timelines here.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/03/fbi-agreed-to-destroy-immunized-clinton-aides-laptops-sources-say.html
Grant Immunity, Obtain Evidence, Destroy Evidence, Lean back on Immunity, Repeat.
“Like many things about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers,” Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va
https://irch.com/destruction-of-hillary-clintons-emails/
The media "spin" around this topic is laughable at best. It is clear to me that, based on the leaked emails and frantic method of attempting to suppress/subvert attention and liability away from the emails - that this was at best, a shell game to buy time and slip the cuffs. At worst, a straight up felony.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/hillary-clinton-emails-bleachbit-227425
If you want to believe Comey/Clinton and the MSM as part of your hyper-skepticism and 100% buy-in of the official narrative, go for it! I'm not falling for it though.