Just came across this: https://www.touchofmodern.com/sales/wingsland-s6/s6-pocket-drone-outdoor-edition
Normally costs around $500... almost 50% off on TouchOfModern. Amazon has the same one being resold at over $600. I'm assuming that this is going to be phased out for their newer model, hence the price cut.
But... if anyone can get close to a point of interest and needs a better look, using micro drones w/ HD or 4K cameras could be our "Bohemian Grove" moment.
Legality would need to be carefully reviewed prior to any drone deployment or filming, but this could certainly help for any foot soldiers that are willing to take a drive and leverage some higher tech solutions.
If anyone is willing to give this a shot and the drone has sufficient range, I would be happy to fund the acquisition of this drone to further out PG efforts and shut this shit down.
view the rest of the comments →
SoldierofLight ago
If someone is aware of a location anywhere in the US that is not in a no flyover zone, and they believe PG shit is happening outside under open skies, they should PM you directly, then the two of you should figure out a secured method for communication so as not to tip off the people who play for keeps. (No cell phone calls over wi-fi, etc.) However the footage is taken, it has to be legally obtained so that it can be introduced in court. Otherwise, you're risking your lives for nothing. Also, if it's illegally obtained, no media is going to be willing to even host a link to it on their website much less anything else.
Your offer is generous, and thank you for that.
UglyTruth ago
Inadmissible evidence can still be used to get leads on evidence which is admissible.
SoldierofLight ago
My concern is that the people in charge already have plenty of leads and where has that gotten us? But if we have video that can be legally posted anywhere AND included in court, we force their hand.
UglyTruth ago
If you're looking for someone to take charge of prosecuting the elites then you're likely to be waiting a very long time. The alternative is the go where the facts lead while applying the principles of due process.
Then there's the issue of having a chain of custody for the video. Ideally this should be supported by affidavits and digital hashes so that there's a guarantee that the public video is the same as the source video.
SoldierofLight ago
I don't disagree with anything you said. I'm just thinking that if we get something good and it goes viral, they'll have to act. Public opinion can put their job security in jeopardy.
Great points you made there about chain of custody, etc. Very important.