Even though this is written by by an admitted pedophile it's actually worth reading. Especially the parts about "romanticists", which I'm seeing more and more of on voat. The people who seem to see something sinister or sexual in damn near anything involving children and adults interacting. He runs through basically everything that spawned pizzagate and I must say his arguments against a conspiracy are worth noting. He's obviously very well educated and intelligent and the whole thing is really well researched. Don't call me a pedo apologist , shil, whatever. Just have an open mind please.
I enjoyed the article as well especially the part about people being romanticists versus ironics. I am an ironic but I believe in pizzagate. I find it just too bad that people are refusing to read it based on the source. It is well written and even though it is about "spin" it shows a lot of "spin" and is informational. When it comes to pizzagate, I listen to James Alefantis who has said that everything pizzagaters are saying about him is true, that he doesn't like children at all and that he and us are in different cultures. He goes on and on about "the family" (as to place himself at the center of it) and how his crew are "visionaries who will not be silenced" meaning they benefit from a certain level of protection for their hobbies and activities. The common thread in all of pizzagate is not the love (or lust) of children it is the focus on the control and consumption of them. This is not a "philiac" act it serves a greater purpose (Monarch/MKUltra).
This article says that the pizzagate crew is a bunch of injoking bullshitter ironics we shouldn't take seriously. But, again, the amount of effort and money spent on floating this macabre cannibalistic/murder "in joke" is so vast that it makes them seem sincere.
The plot device of this article is that it goes 75% of the way, ignoring the progress that has been made after the initial discovery of the content. Which is a very American-style propaganda technique. Pander to people's inability to pay attention or lack of care to know more once they have been given permission to dismiss something.
view the rest of the comments →
Travellingman ago
Even though this is written by by an admitted pedophile it's actually worth reading. Especially the parts about "romanticists", which I'm seeing more and more of on voat. The people who seem to see something sinister or sexual in damn near anything involving children and adults interacting. He runs through basically everything that spawned pizzagate and I must say his arguments against a conspiracy are worth noting. He's obviously very well educated and intelligent and the whole thing is really well researched. Don't call me a pedo apologist , shil, whatever. Just have an open mind please.
EvaEverywhere ago
I enjoyed the article as well especially the part about people being romanticists versus ironics. I am an ironic but I believe in pizzagate. I find it just too bad that people are refusing to read it based on the source. It is well written and even though it is about "spin" it shows a lot of "spin" and is informational. When it comes to pizzagate, I listen to James Alefantis who has said that everything pizzagaters are saying about him is true, that he doesn't like children at all and that he and us are in different cultures. He goes on and on about "the family" (as to place himself at the center of it) and how his crew are "visionaries who will not be silenced" meaning they benefit from a certain level of protection for their hobbies and activities. The common thread in all of pizzagate is not the love (or lust) of children it is the focus on the control and consumption of them. This is not a "philiac" act it serves a greater purpose (Monarch/MKUltra).
This article says that the pizzagate crew is a bunch of injoking bullshitter ironics we shouldn't take seriously. But, again, the amount of effort and money spent on floating this macabre cannibalistic/murder "in joke" is so vast that it makes them seem sincere.
The plot device of this article is that it goes 75% of the way, ignoring the progress that has been made after the initial discovery of the content. Which is a very American-style propaganda technique. Pander to people's inability to pay attention or lack of care to know more once they have been given permission to dismiss something.