related -

Why Is CPS Losing Tens of Thousands of Children Per Year? Where Do They Go?

http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/222266-2017-07-26-why-is-cps-losing-tens-of-thousands-of-children-per.htm?From=News

Hillary began her "career" writing a piece for the Harvard Review that achieved some acclaim. You have to pay to read the entire thing but here are a couple of links describing it. It seems to be an argument for granting children rights as adults based on maturity rather than age. This is all well and good but is an escape clause for child predators and rapists. It is also the argument that NAMBLA uses, that sex is for children, too, and they should be able to choose when they want to become active sexually with others. I find the arguments too similar to ignore. And then there was HIllary laughing that she got a child predator off easy because he passed a lie detector test, and also because SHE LOST THE EVIDENCE.

Hillary Clinton wrote a piece for the Harvard Review -- purchase access to it here: ---- http://hepg.org/her-home/issues/harvard-educational-review-volume-43,-issue-4/herarticle/_991

Here is a commentary on it: ---------------
what hillary rodham clinton really said about children's rights and child policy https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/30351/0000753.pdf

and here is what is in wikipedia: ----------- Rodham began a year of postgraduate study on children and medicine at the Yale Child Study Center.[59] In late 1973 her first scholarly article, "Children Under the Law", was published in the Harvard Educational Review.[60] Discussing the new children's rights movement, it stated that "child citizens" were "powerless individuals"[61] and argued that children should not be considered equally incompetent from birth to attaining legal age, but instead that courts should presume competence except when there is evidence otherwise, on a case-by-case basis.[62] The article became frequently cited in the field.[63]

It is correct, the CPS is not a government brunch, only the Juvenile courts are part of the DOJ that rubber-stamp the kidnappings. Coincidently, the DOJ didn't audit the Juventile courts in the last two decades on legal violations, only on financial accuracy of the juvenile court filings that are usually stellar. This is why when the CPS violations occur, the Federal Government conveniently doesn't know anything about the violations and doesn't get involved. It is left to the corrupt state officials who let it happen in the first place to address, who never get involved in the Juvenile courts decisions because it's part of the DOJ. Only unanimously reelect the same judges who provide such splendid funding to the states and contribute to the corrupt officials campaigns though various real estate and other kickback schemes.

i really appreciate you posting this. am red pilling a few people about cps. this should do it.

CPS is not a "branch" of government. It is an agency of that respective state.

The three branches of government are executive, legislative, and judicial.

Completely disgusting & wrong. CPS needs a thorough nation-wide ethical & financial audit. If your average parent knew this, there would be riots.

Could the horrendous happenings with the Scalese shooter with his two foster children been a part of this law? We're those kids just a paycheck to this villain?

Horrendous. Not just Clinton's but everyone who was involved in this disgusting abuse of power.