You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

Because it's a ridiculous basis upon which to libel someone as a pedophile trafficker

DeathTooMasons ago

Lord of the downvoat, still champion.

9776589? ago

Hooray, #chickenlover I finally have downvoat privileges and you are the first beneficiary!

Are_we_sure ago

Good choice!

DeathTooMasons ago

Always the right choice.

scotchfor1 ago

There should be restrictions on rights of a suspected pedohile, significantly diminished.

davemcgowanwasright ago

What's really ridiculous is to ignore it entirely in a staged interview.

pizzaequalspedo ago

What's not ridiculous (and should be expected), to at least ask some follow up questions on why all the sick social media comments/jokes.

PedoStomper ago

Yeah because people who post things like THIS FUCKIN PICTURE on social media are completely mentally-stable people with no problems at all and they definitely should not be looked into for any reason whatsoever.

Go fuck a goat, James Alefuckface. And fuck all those who stand up for him. Honestly, I'd love to smash someone's teeth out if I heard them in real life saying those pictures mean nothing. Kids are being RAPED AND MOLESTED inside of that establishment.

9782317? ago

and eaten.

Are_we_sure ago

You're reading completely nutso things into that picture based on fucked up shit in your own head or a prior conclusion you have already come to. Perhaps something like this

Kids are being RAPED AND MOLESTED inside of that establishment.

And your evidence of this is.....? This picture of a smiling girl who is known to the people following his instagram?

Also do you think I'm James Alefantis? Because if so mental stability might not be your area of expertise.

PedoStomper ago

No I don't think you're Jimmy Vomit. And if you can look through that guy's entire Instagram and think "Nothing going on here," then YOU are the one who has mental issues. It's not my fault that reality is too big and scary for you to wrap your head around, shill.

Cara_C ago

This picture is the least of it.

Onetime1 ago

If you take a few moments to just study that picture, particularly that little girl's arms, several things should become clear. There are at least 14 strips of tape (high resolution indicates painter's masking tape) which must have taken some time to apply. In the Kelly interview, JA dismissively states the girl's sister did this. What parent could believe, let alone passively observe, a young child allowing herself to be taped to a table. (The girl's torso is pressed against the table restricting movement). The difference in arms is so striking that, akin to handwriting, different people applied the tape. One sleeve is rolled up. Hand positions are different. Most tellingly, the placement of tape strips on left arm is sloppy, possibly placed by an adolescent. Right arm taping much more uniform, firm, indicative of purposeful adult actions.

DeathTooMasons ago

And look at the bags under her eyes.

Harpua33 ago

Get the kid out for an interview

JUNOAK ago

In what way does the right arm tape look like purposeful adult action? (I've also heard it described as a 'professional tape job' whatever that is). The right hand tape is all over the place similar to the other hand. The right hand tape is actually so poor that it looks like there is enough room that she's actually lifting her forearm off the table, the pieces of tape on the side arent even doing anything.

JUNOAK ago

Does anyone know how old her sister is?