This is a branch-off of my post yesterday about the FBI's website of missing children and how they have only a small number of kids listed on there. I got some great comments on the post, including one from Votescam that mentioned the Polly Klaas foundation's website and their supposed Master List of missing Children.
The list is 15 pages long... maybe 150 kids listed total? HOW IN THE WORLD IS THIS THE MASTER LIST OF MISSING CHILDREN?
Link to the Polly Klaas Master List of Missing Children: Polly Klaas Master List of Missing Children
Who are these kids? Why are they on the list and 99.9% of missing kids are not?
One pro I can offer is that at least these kids went missing lately, unlike the FBI's list of kids, some of whom went missing in the 60's and 70's! Clearly listing kids who've gone missing recently will help more than listing kids who went missing 50 years ago.
I always use young kidnap victim Johnny Gosch as a test. He is still classified as a missing child, and you CAN IN FACT find him listed on the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children's Website. But he is not on the Polly Klaas website's "master list of missing children." Why?
view the rest of the comments →
new4now ago
this official site has 832 pages of what looks like 10 kids per page
what surprised me were the amount of kids missing the same day and just how many of them have no picture
on 6-19-17... 6 kids reported missing
on 6-18-17... 8 kids missing
on each day, only 2 had pictures
on the 2 days, 5 were in Columbus County
You would have to go through a lot of missing kids to get a count in each county
2 days and Ohio has 14 kids reported missing
Hate to see what California and Texas have
Here's the link http://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/Law-Enforcement/Local-Law-Enforcement/Ohio-Missing-Persons/Missing-Children?page=1 I'm sure you've been here, but maybe someone else would like to take a look
11-11 ago
Thanks for this
Looks like it was a bit of work to gather this stuff
I really wish that threads like this garnered more attention than they do, This (your) type of research deserves way more upvotes than it got
3141592653 ago
I concur