It's not about accolades, it's about the truth. I'm not outright saying I'm correct, but there are certainly some official explanations to be proffered as to what and whom exactly the likes of Podesta are involved with.
Well basically, they're not just talking about Podesta at the Summit... they're talking about me as well and how I essentially figured out exactly what happened to Madeleine without any tangible intelligence.
Podesta has literally shit his pants about it, so he's obviously guilty of something incredibly heinous. So I guess he's gonna be after me for this, meaning he's gonna have to join a very long queue because half of England hates me now as well.
I can't even pull rank to sort this out, and I'm a Royal.
Personally, I'd rather not go pointing fingers so long as there is only supposition, but it has to be brought into question now. Clearly there is a global network which is not only targetting children directly, but also adults who are forced or blackmailed into doing the dirty work (so Podesta probably didn't literally kidnap Madeleine, somebody more dispensable would have and I have a very odd feeling as to whom but I won't say right now).
Let us take for example the case of April Jones. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the slaughterhouse guy did not act alone, he was just the fall-guy. What's worse is that her body was put in a trough and fed to the sheep, which suffice to say would enter into the human food chain. This is precisely why her body has never been found, and neither will Madeleine's. It's the same with James Bulger, all we know is that they left him on a train track - but the reality is that the child was brutally beaten and it was camcorded (who by, who knows... but I am certain it was a snuff job), as were April and Madeleine.
So the big question from me is why Her Majesty's Government persistently issues downright false information to the public or only half of the story. Like I said, I won't point fingers at the Crown itself in this respect but they certainly have a duty to explain why the British public are never told the truth about the deeply troubling problem we have in regards to what can only be described as the most unholy practices imaginable.
People ridicule religion, but turn a blind-eye when pure evil stares them in the face. Odd, very odd indeed.
Well, I am sure they do not tell the truth about anything. As with the death of Princess Diana, the Queen will forever keep mum.
If they told the truth, too many people would have solved pedogate
long ago.
As for the Madeleine tragedy:
One or both of Madeleine's parents I believe are not her biological parent/s. My guess is IVF, and that Soros was the sperm donor. Kate & Gerry probably was pd well & knew that at some point Soros and his cohorts would be back for Madeleine.
Maybe, Kate & Gerry was caught off guard & with emotions running high called police that night. Then once things seemed to settle down, they realised Soros came calling.
Kate & Gerry reminded be a lot of Jon Benet's parents. You knew they knew who killed their daughter.
Blackmail? as in some of these elites may once had morals, but was compromised! That is where I have great confusion.
I actually think Our Lady knew all about this sort of stuff, and hence her being murdered. I think she was going to break some news about Royal lineage which somebody didn't want heard. Well, I guess I already know now.
As to Gerry McCann, my theory is that he's impotent, which would possibly explain why Kate had so much difficulty conceiving. So yes, they went the IVF route (which is true, Kate even says so in her book although I don't think she mentions anything about donors so she'd probably say that it was Gerry's sperm), and hence that Gerry is possibly not the biological father. Strangely enough, we never hear anything about this in the media which is quite telling in my opinion. It's actually extremely relevant to Operation Grange, but seemingly they choose to ignore this fine detail and that is in spite of my repeated attempts to get into contact with them.
I'm also curious as to whether or not Kate may have had an affair while Gerry was playing tennis, he may have found out and then had a temper tantrum about it. He could then have conspired with his tennis buddies (whom could've been people like Murat, people who knew Freud, and who knows what other Freemasonry types) as to what could be done with Madeleine as he had already taken to an unhealthy disliking for her. Bear in mind that Dave was asking Gerry if Kate should be checked-upon whilst he was playing tennis, and this was not too long before they went for tapas - so he might've stumbled into what could only be described as a rather embarrassing moment for Kate (whom by the way was not even wearing her wedding ring) and she might not even have realised she'd been seen in the shower with another man (heck, that man could even have been Dave himself, and he was actually checking up on Gerry to be sure he wasn't just going to walk into the apartment while they were frolicking around). Consider that if Kate did indeed have an affair, then this could have left her extremely vulnerable to blackmail.
So, put a jealous psycho, a cheating wife and another man's daughter in a box... and you'll be forgiven to think that you put a cat and a dog in there and they didn't get along very well.
I know I'm being probed, I have been for a long time so I can pick up on it very quickly.
For what it's worth, I have a regional accent. It is very hard to avoid having an accent if you grow up in an English city. A cleaner accent would normally be heard either in the middle-to-upper classes or in the countryside (although rural areas could sound a bit farmer-ish, country bumpkins as well might call 'em). So basically, I came through a poor childhood and therefore speak mostly with a city accent, although it's actually mixed now due to moving about a lot.
Going back 100 years or so, I'd bet that my family would have spoken the proper King's English, as it were at the time. Don't ask me what went wrong, I think somebody abdicated or something like that.
Well you're very kind for answering. You guys are so varied for such a small country, though you are pretty crowded. That was a tough question I threw at you. Thanks again!
view the rest of the comments →
quantokitty ago
This proves Trump is getting to him. He's not used to someone calling him on this shit. The scrutiny is wearing away at Pedosta.
He's crackin'!
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
It's not Trump who's got to him - I did.
quantokitty ago
Really? Thanks for letting me know.
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
You're welcome. Everybody knows anyway, so I might as well start talking I guess...
quantokitty ago
Sure! Take credit where credit is due.
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
It's not about accolades, it's about the truth. I'm not outright saying I'm correct, but there are certainly some official explanations to be proffered as to what and whom exactly the likes of Podesta are involved with.
quantokitty ago
Yes, truth.
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Tell us more😁
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
Well basically, they're not just talking about Podesta at the Summit... they're talking about me as well and how I essentially figured out exactly what happened to Madeleine without any tangible intelligence.
Podesta has literally shit his pants about it, so he's obviously guilty of something incredibly heinous. So I guess he's gonna be after me for this, meaning he's gonna have to join a very long queue because half of England hates me now as well.
I can't even pull rank to sort this out, and I'm a Royal.
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Is the Evil Pedo Satanic stuff about the Queen, Phillip, Charles, & Andrew true also?
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
Personally, I'd rather not go pointing fingers so long as there is only supposition, but it has to be brought into question now. Clearly there is a global network which is not only targetting children directly, but also adults who are forced or blackmailed into doing the dirty work (so Podesta probably didn't literally kidnap Madeleine, somebody more dispensable would have and I have a very odd feeling as to whom but I won't say right now).
Let us take for example the case of April Jones. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the slaughterhouse guy did not act alone, he was just the fall-guy. What's worse is that her body was put in a trough and fed to the sheep, which suffice to say would enter into the human food chain. This is precisely why her body has never been found, and neither will Madeleine's. It's the same with James Bulger, all we know is that they left him on a train track - but the reality is that the child was brutally beaten and it was camcorded (who by, who knows... but I am certain it was a snuff job), as were April and Madeleine.
So the big question from me is why Her Majesty's Government persistently issues downright false information to the public or only half of the story. Like I said, I won't point fingers at the Crown itself in this respect but they certainly have a duty to explain why the British public are never told the truth about the deeply troubling problem we have in regards to what can only be described as the most unholy practices imaginable.
People ridicule religion, but turn a blind-eye when pure evil stares them in the face. Odd, very odd indeed.
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Well, I am sure they do not tell the truth about anything. As with the death of Princess Diana, the Queen will forever keep mum.
If they told the truth, too many people would have solved pedogate long ago.
As for the Madeleine tragedy: One or both of Madeleine's parents I believe are not her biological parent/s. My guess is IVF, and that Soros was the sperm donor. Kate & Gerry probably was pd well & knew that at some point Soros and his cohorts would be back for Madeleine. Maybe, Kate & Gerry was caught off guard & with emotions running high called police that night. Then once things seemed to settle down, they realised Soros came calling.
Kate & Gerry reminded be a lot of Jon Benet's parents. You knew they knew who killed their daughter.
Blackmail? as in some of these elites may once had morals, but was compromised! That is where I have great confusion.
victims those who never had a choice, excluded
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
I actually think Our Lady knew all about this sort of stuff, and hence her being murdered. I think she was going to break some news about Royal lineage which somebody didn't want heard. Well, I guess I already know now.
As to Gerry McCann, my theory is that he's impotent, which would possibly explain why Kate had so much difficulty conceiving. So yes, they went the IVF route (which is true, Kate even says so in her book although I don't think she mentions anything about donors so she'd probably say that it was Gerry's sperm), and hence that Gerry is possibly not the biological father. Strangely enough, we never hear anything about this in the media which is quite telling in my opinion. It's actually extremely relevant to Operation Grange, but seemingly they choose to ignore this fine detail and that is in spite of my repeated attempts to get into contact with them.
I'm also curious as to whether or not Kate may have had an affair while Gerry was playing tennis, he may have found out and then had a temper tantrum about it. He could then have conspired with his tennis buddies (whom could've been people like Murat, people who knew Freud, and who knows what other Freemasonry types) as to what could be done with Madeleine as he had already taken to an unhealthy disliking for her. Bear in mind that Dave was asking Gerry if Kate should be checked-upon whilst he was playing tennis, and this was not too long before they went for tapas - so he might've stumbled into what could only be described as a rather embarrassing moment for Kate (whom by the way was not even wearing her wedding ring) and she might not even have realised she'd been seen in the shower with another man (heck, that man could even have been Dave himself, and he was actually checking up on Gerry to be sure he wasn't just going to walk into the apartment while they were frolicking around). Consider that if Kate did indeed have an affair, then this could have left her extremely vulnerable to blackmail.
So, put a jealous psycho, a cheating wife and another man's daughter in a box... and you'll be forgiven to think that you put a cat and a dog in there and they didn't get along very well.
bopper ago
Do you understand what I mean when I say "the Queen's English"? Speaking I'm meaning.
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
I don't know if you're referring to written grammar, but I'll assume you mean orally.
What does that have to do with anything? Are you asking me if I have an accent?
bopper ago
I am probing you! No worry I'm harmless. I did mean the proper queen's English accent. I'm here in the USA, have friends over there.
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
I know I'm being probed, I have been for a long time so I can pick up on it very quickly.
For what it's worth, I have a regional accent. It is very hard to avoid having an accent if you grow up in an English city. A cleaner accent would normally be heard either in the middle-to-upper classes or in the countryside (although rural areas could sound a bit farmer-ish, country bumpkins as well might call 'em). So basically, I came through a poor childhood and therefore speak mostly with a city accent, although it's actually mixed now due to moving about a lot.
Going back 100 years or so, I'd bet that my family would have spoken the proper King's English, as it were at the time. Don't ask me what went wrong, I think somebody abdicated or something like that.
bopper ago
Well you're very kind for answering. You guys are so varied for such a small country, though you are pretty crowded. That was a tough question I threw at you. Thanks again!
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
Oh believe me... put a Geordie, a Scouser, a Brummie, a Cockney and a Welshman in a room together and nobody's gonna understand a single word said.
It's alright, I'm really not as paranoid as people make me out to be. Afraid, yes... but when duty calls, one has to report in.
bopper ago
I'll take the Cockney lol. I grew up on the Beatles. Keep us posted!