Talk about the #MSM "normalizing" child porn. In Massachusetts, the douchebags who publish the WORCESTER TELEGRAM AND GAZETTE (on Twitter at @Telegramdotcom) posted a picture of a 2 year old boy with all private parts exposed. The pic has been posted since June 26th for all to see. The staff person who posted it is named STEVE LANAVA (on Twitter as @SteveLanava). I wonder if Steve Lavana likes little boys? UNFUCKINGREAL.
The sick photographer who took the pic and posted it is on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/SteveLanava?s=03
The sick rag that proudly posted this pic can be found on Twitter here:
https://twitter.com/telegramdotcom?s=03
Not surprisingly, Steve Lanava posts creepy fucking pics and has a single fucking Illuminati-ish eye as his Twitter profile pic.
I don't know how to archive but if anyone does, please go to town on this suck bastard.
A local blog called Turtleboy Sports called them out on it here: http://turtleboysports.com/why-is-the-telegram-and-gazette-publishing-little-kid-noodz-on-their-website/
As of a short while ago, the picture appears to have been removed. It still comes up in searches of the Worcester Telegram and Gazette website, however.
FUCK THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA
view the rest of the comments →
equineluvr ago
"Not surprisingly, Steve Lanava posts creepy fucking pics and has a single fucking Illuminati-ish eye as his Twitter profile pic".
It’s not unusual for a professional PHOTOGRAPHER to use an eye symbol.
That is a shot of his RIGHT EYE. The LEFT eye is used to denote the Illuminati.
LEFT EYE IS ILLUMINATI
The FOR SALE pic (YOUR LINK AND DESCRIPTION) is a different one – not obscene, not nudity. It’s a different photo altogether. Perhaps changed now due to public pressure?
http://www.telegram.com/news/20170626/beach-buddies
It is highly unusual for a newspaper to violate its own policies.
And YES, shame on them for ever posting the photo. But, again, you are INCORRECT on the two points above, OP.