IMPTORTANT: RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS & LEADERS > WIDESPREAD PEDOPHILLIA / HUMAN TRAFFICKING / CHILD DAY CARE CENTERS / CONNECTION TO "CLINTONS & BARAK OBAMA" - GET IN HERE!!!!! (pizzagate)

submitted ago by HereticalPeasant

I'm so sorry but there's no way I can retype this shit. It was deleted due to the dubious title. Understandable. PLEASE READ THIS!!!!!!!!

ALSO HERE IS THE PASTEBIN consisting of the entire text in one place, in its entirety - for easier reading.

PLEASE HELP ME RESEARCH FURTHER!!! I'M TRYING MY DARNEST, BUT I NEED HELP!!!

ADDING THIS:

ALSO: Voat member @WhyAserverWasBuilt noted: "Lyons is a pedophile. I have a copy of an FDLE investigation into the sexual abuse of minors in the black churches of Pinellas and Hillsborough counties. ( This was actually a fed ring that ran up to Kentucky). On page 19, the last page is a diagram of the pyramid of players. The top brick is Henry Lyons. He did jail time for the money embezeling but not for the sex rings. The media only told part of the story. Much like Larry King of Franklin cover up. He did time for the money laundering, but also not charged for harming children. Both black Baptists who were religious were having child sex parties. But never charged. I have a PDF copy of the actual investigation. Can i upload it here?. This has been built up all over the country! They are both out of jail now."

AS WELL AS: "PS. There is also a democratic party operative and a democratic elected state official in the ' pyramid' of players. That would be Daryl Rouson, a 'former' crackhead who continues to get reelected. He was a republican however when he was named in the investigation, and later became a democrat when maps were redrawn. Then the electronic voting machines take care of the rest."

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@HereticalPeasant: You have gathering a great deal of material, here, and I would love to flair it. But it currently doesn't not meet our submission rules. In order to facilitate research and vetting of posts as worthwhile time investments, Rule 3 requires:

EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).

I don't want to remove this -- please edit in a brief descrition or summary of each link. Once you've done so, ping me and I will consider giving it a flair to encourage eyeballs.

Regarding the earlier version that was removed: You can easily copy and paste the text of your removed post. Just go to Removed Submissions (link at bottom of sidebar), click "edit' or "source" (whichever is available) to open the source box, and copy it from there. That retains all the formatting and hyperlinks etc. so you can easily create a new post.

HereticalPeasant ago

Thank you for not removing it.

I will definitely redo this post.

I just wanted to get the info out for others to possibly start looking into it.