I posted about this earlier.
I discussed it with my boss, and he thought it's interesting, especially to criticize the hypocrisy of YouTube in censorship.
We are a right wing magazine and want to base it on facts.
I want more information on this:
https://ghostbin.com/paste/qpjoc37c/authenticate
password = cialol
I 've described this whole rabbit hole for our article, but I 'd like more background information.
So far I 've written that it's a strange rabbit hole and that we aren't sure if it's a hoax or real (we aren't a conspiracy mag, so I can only write things down with certitude if they are based on facts).
We are non-MSM, but we don't want to write a conspiracy piece (unless you can prove it with direct evidence)
We need facts.
I 've also discussed some of the disturbing videos on YouTube, but I 'd also like answers on these questions:
- Can we find any warnings about this? By official people?
- Are there professionals who know about elsagate?
- Can you give more information on the codes used in the comments?
We want to write an extensive piece on this.
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
You need to define what your standards of evidence are going to be. Are you looking for photos of Podesta and HRC disemboweling a child or are you willing to analyze mountains of circumstantial evidence, a tenth of which would be enough to open an investigation within any US LE agency. Obviously well beyond Elsagate, but the point being, is sometimes you have to string a lot of coincidences and gut feelings together to solve an investigation. Not everything will be 100% black and white hard evidence.
The scope and breadth of what started as Pizzagate has expanded to included alien theories at this point.
If you are looking to leverage our body of knowledge, you will first need to decide who is and isn't a credible researcher.
If you are focusing on Elsagate, you may want to consider some sort of contextual backgrounder - modern history of child porn and child/human sex and organ trafficking. There are mountains of facts out there which pertain to a litany of known SRA/sex cases, etc. The reader needs to understand the magnitude and the level of depravity which exists.
Then turn them on to Elsagate.
Other thought - I would consider a frame-by-frame analysis of some of the saucier videos. I'd also look at it on some editing equipment where you can underscan the image and see what is going on outside of the video image (time code, artifacts in the vertical interval, etc.). My theory is that somehow, "they" have figured out how to help with programming and suggestion through some sort of subliminally interpreted "morse code" combined with imagery.
Ushil ago
Yes, what you describe in your last paragraph is exactly what we are doing. Our boss wants it to be fact-based, not contain speculative conspiracy stuff. We can discuss the codes in the comments though, these are fact-based.
Blacksmith21 ago
The code words in Wikileaks should definitely be considered circumstantial evidence. No one doubts their authenticity. Not even Podesta. Also, JA and CPP Instagram page archives are even more damning. Again, all 100% real with no one disputing their veracity. Let the reader draw their own conclusion.
Honestly, I've found the best way to toe someone into this mess, is to get them in through the "human/organ trafficking" angle - more money than drug trade; human body worth XXX; Elsa videos groom kids to be more receptive to the advances of pedophiles. Especially if they can reference the videos and related to a target.
Ushil ago
Our article is about Elsagate, not about Pizzagate
Shillaxe ago
The fact you won't name your publication is suspicious, how do we know your not trying to protect Elsagate perps, your questions lead me to believe your trying to find out how much is known so you can protect your " boss". Something isn't right with you, do you use social media, can you verify who YOU are, gatekeeper ? Edit* what other topics does your "right wing" publication discuss, do you endorse right wing political candidates, values etc...
Ushil ago
Check your inbox. I 'm not a shill, after we've published our article I 'll post it here.
Shillaxe ago
As a self described "right wing" publication im not surprised to find your website www.verenoflood.nu to list these U.S. publications as its opinion sources:
Wall Street Journal Washington Post USA Today The New York Post The Chicago Tribune The Los Angeles Times The Boston Globe
Political websites The Hill
Weeklies Forbes , The Atlantic , The Weekly Standard , Time As well it gets opinions from Israel Jerusalem Post Haaretz Daily https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&nv=1&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=nl&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=http://verenoflood.nu/&usg=ALkJrhjWmxdhV8jr5h7Hm3b4VmD2-iGwfw I've just begun my digging but your welcome to refute anything
Ushil ago
Just wait and see for the article, I write it in an objective way, I think you'll get excited when it's published
Shillaxe ago
Considering you use WaPo as an opinion source, I await your spin on Elsagate , im sure they'll be plenty of reasonable doubt included.
Ushil ago
Listen, I was asked to write for that magazine, its,' opinion sources don't represent my own. My spin will be one in which I give factual information and describe what people think of this stuff etc.
Shillaxe ago
Its a fascist publication & you agreed to write for them..... looking forward to your article but don't expect any sympathy from me, you were chosen for your naivety.