Like I said AreWeSure you're the most naive person I've ever met in my life.
The worst is your taking the 9/11 story hook, line and sinker. I'm pretty sure you're an SEIU guy at this point. To see you take David Rockefeller at face value is disheartening.
How the hell are you people ever going to get a leg up when you let the Rockefeller's drive over you for the past 100 years.
Remember I'm a poor person just like you. My bank account is running on vapors on a daily basis. I've been lower middle class all my life. I'd love to join a union like SEIU. Do they cover IT workers?
I didn't know this but I'm sure you did working for the SEIU down in DC. Evidently Andrew McCabe has to sign a disclosure every quarter listing any financial gifts he or anyone in his family have received over $200.
I'm an engineer so all this bureaucracy stuff is new to me. So when you laugh and dismiss things I can't immediately respond because I have to research the issue and perform the due diligence any objective person would do. But come on AreWeSure this isn't even debatable anymore. Andrew McCabe has broken the law here. His wife received somewhere between $650,000 and $1,200,000 in campaign contributions which Andrew was supposed to disclose. McCabe's failure to disclose makes his arrest virtually assured. He also loses his immunity if he's violated its conditions and failure to disclose a $650,000 gift is more than enough. It shows INTENT to obstruct justice. And Robert Mueller violating his obligation to remain objective violate HIS implicit immunity being the lead investigator. Trump can even fire Mueller at any time for obstruction of justice which Andrew McCabe's case clearly imply. You can say "But Nixon..." all you want. The problem is Nixon didn't have the former 1 and 2 at the FBI dead to rights. Remember?
What's going on here is Jeff Sessions is just giving McCabe enough rope with which to hang himself. It's all over but the cryin' AreWeSure. Jeff Sessions is basically a lion playing with a baby gazelle he just caught hunting on the Serengeti. This is bad, real bad. I remember Bill Still reporting on a Hillary Clinton tirade after that infamous Matt Lauer interview. After the debate Hillary screamed at her staff:
I truly have no idea why you believe any of that, unless deep down you need to, but it's nonsense. Here's a clue when something that would obviously be noticed a year ago comes out as some sort of big news, it's usually nonsense. Did you think the FBI wouldn't notice that his wife was running for senate in Virginia? Seriously? Did you think any of the pro-Trump FBI guys wouldn't mention something if he was out of compliance? It's ludicrous.l
First of all learn what a financial gift is. It's not campaign contributions. Second of all McCabe long ago complied with what he needed to.
But come on AreWeSure this isn't even debatable anymore. Andrew McCabe has broken the law here.
It's not debatable. You are completely wrong on this issue and swallowing talking points. All this was debunked last year. This is an attack on law enforcement because Donald Trump is in severe legal jeopardy.
There's absolutely nothing that says if you work for the FBI, your wife can run for office. There is, however, an Office of Integrity and Compliance and you would need to consult with them and follow their guidelines which is what McCabe did.
As smears go, this is a particularly dumb one. But they need to work with what they.
"Did you think the FBI wouldn't notice that his wife was running for senate in Virginia?"
You mean the one person above Andrew by the name of James Comey? Come on AreWeSure, you're not this naive. The leadership of the FBI can't investigate itself. That's why there's special prosecutors. This reminds me of when you dismissed allegations the CIA was involved in drug running by pointing me to the fact the CIA had investigated itself and found no wrong doing. ROFLMAO. Remember that one AreWeSure? I laughed for hours.
"You are completely wrong on this issue"
Are you denying Andrew McCabe's wife got a $650,000 campaign donation?
"There's absolutely nothing that says if you work for the FBI, your wife can run for office."
And there it is: The Straw Man! He always shows up with you. Of course an FBI employee's spouse can run for office. However the FBI employee must report any monetary gifts given to their family of greater than $200 and recuse themselves if there's a conflict of interest.
Are you denying that Andrew McCabe's wife getting $650,000 from Democratic sources would produce a conflict of interest in the investigation into Hillary's email server and possibly sending classified documents?
You better think long and hard on that one AreWeSure.
I was using the broadest interpretation of "gift" given disclosure rules but to make you happy I'll say campaign contribution. It's still the same question:
Is Andrew McCabe's wife getting a $650,000 campaign contribution from a close associate of Hillary Clinton a potential conflict of interest given McCabe's investigation into Hillary's use of an unencrypted email server?
The Inspector General of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee are investigating McCabe for concerns that he should have recused himself from the investigation of Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server because of a potential conflict of interest caused by donations to his wife's Virginia State Senate campaign
Sure seems like your industrial strength naivete has clouded your vision again. Just in case you forgot, here's your most recent browbeater accusing me and The Inspector General of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee of being "dumb":
As smears go, this is a particularly dumb one. But they need to work with what they.
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
AreWeSure I eagerly await your explanation normalizing whatever the fuck this guy's into:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJBtJaISlqc
Don't let me down.
:-D
Are_we_sure ago
I'm much more of a BABY HULK vs HULK MOM kind of guy. That video is fantastic.
DarkMath ago
Like I said AreWeSure you're the most naive person I've ever met in my life.
The worst is your taking the 9/11 story hook, line and sinker. I'm pretty sure you're an SEIU guy at this point. To see you take David Rockefeller at face value is disheartening.
https://www.google.com/#q=Rockefeller+union+busting
How the hell are you people ever going to get a leg up when you let the Rockefeller's drive over you for the past 100 years.
Remember I'm a poor person just like you. My bank account is running on vapors on a daily basis. I've been lower middle class all my life. I'd love to join a union like SEIU. Do they cover IT workers?
Sigh.......
Are_we_sure ago
You're the guy who always bring politics into a scientific argument. You don't understand the science, so you bring in David Rockefeller.
Also a fan of George Webb should be banned for life from calling anyone naive.
DarkMath ago
I didn't know this but I'm sure you did working for the SEIU down in DC. Evidently Andrew McCabe has to sign a disclosure every quarter listing any financial gifts he or anyone in his family have received over $200.
I'm an engineer so all this bureaucracy stuff is new to me. So when you laugh and dismiss things I can't immediately respond because I have to research the issue and perform the due diligence any objective person would do. But come on AreWeSure this isn't even debatable anymore. Andrew McCabe has broken the law here. His wife received somewhere between $650,000 and $1,200,000 in campaign contributions which Andrew was supposed to disclose. McCabe's failure to disclose makes his arrest virtually assured. He also loses his immunity if he's violated its conditions and failure to disclose a $650,000 gift is more than enough. It shows INTENT to obstruct justice. And Robert Mueller violating his obligation to remain objective violate HIS implicit immunity being the lead investigator. Trump can even fire Mueller at any time for obstruction of justice which Andrew McCabe's case clearly imply. You can say "But Nixon..." all you want. The problem is Nixon didn't have the former 1 and 2 at the FBI dead to rights. Remember?
What's going on here is Jeff Sessions is just giving McCabe enough rope with which to hang himself. It's all over but the cryin' AreWeSure. Jeff Sessions is basically a lion playing with a baby gazelle he just caught hunting on the Serengeti. This is bad, real bad. I remember Bill Still reporting on a Hillary Clinton tirade after that infamous Matt Lauer interview. After the debate Hillary screamed at her staff:
"If that fucking bastard[Trump] wins we all hang from nooses!"
Well McCabe just guaranteed that.
Muahahahaha
:-D
Are_we_sure ago
I truly have no idea why you believe any of that, unless deep down you need to, but it's nonsense. Here's a clue when something that would obviously be noticed a year ago comes out as some sort of big news, it's usually nonsense. Did you think the FBI wouldn't notice that his wife was running for senate in Virginia? Seriously? Did you think any of the pro-Trump FBI guys wouldn't mention something if he was out of compliance? It's ludicrous.l
First of all learn what a financial gift is. It's not campaign contributions. Second of all McCabe long ago complied with what he needed to.
It's not debatable. You are completely wrong on this issue and swallowing talking points. All this was debunked last year. This is an attack on law enforcement because Donald Trump is in severe legal jeopardy.
There's absolutely nothing that says if you work for the FBI, your wife can run for office. There is, however, an Office of Integrity and Compliance and you would need to consult with them and follow their guidelines which is what McCabe did.
As smears go, this is a particularly dumb one. But they need to work with what they.
DarkMath ago
"Did you think the FBI wouldn't notice that his wife was running for senate in Virginia?"
You mean the one person above Andrew by the name of James Comey? Come on AreWeSure, you're not this naive. The leadership of the FBI can't investigate itself. That's why there's special prosecutors. This reminds me of when you dismissed allegations the CIA was involved in drug running by pointing me to the fact the CIA had investigated itself and found no wrong doing. ROFLMAO. Remember that one AreWeSure? I laughed for hours.
"You are completely wrong on this issue"
Are you denying Andrew McCabe's wife got a $650,000 campaign donation?
"There's absolutely nothing that says if you work for the FBI, your wife can run for office."
And there it is: The Straw Man! He always shows up with you. Of course an FBI employee's spouse can run for office. However the FBI employee must report any monetary gifts given to their family of greater than $200 and recuse themselves if there's a conflict of interest.
Are you denying that Andrew McCabe's wife getting $650,000 from Democratic sources would produce a conflict of interest in the investigation into Hillary's email server and possibly sending classified documents?
You better think long and hard on that one AreWeSure.
:-D
Are_we_sure ago
You're getting dumber by the day.
It's not a gift
DarkMath ago
"It's not a gift"
I was using the broadest interpretation of "gift" given disclosure rules but to make you happy I'll say campaign contribution. It's still the same question:
Is Andrew McCabe's wife getting a $650,000 campaign contribution from a close associate of Hillary Clinton a potential conflict of interest given McCabe's investigation into Hillary's use of an unencrypted email server?
Here's a little something to get you started.
Just in case clicking a link is too much effort:
Sure seems like your industrial strength naivete has clouded your vision again. Just in case you forgot, here's your most recent browbeater accusing me and The Inspector General of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee of being "dumb":
:-D