But what is considered the Hard Evidence? Is there a video of someone caught in the act of pedophilia? I dont understand how hard evidence can be dismissed. Is there actual evidence that would hold up in a court of law? Can someone just go present the evidence to a lawyer, open a lawsuit against the alleged perpetrators and see them in court?
There is no hard evidence. They keep trying to change the meaning once they strike out, but Pizzagate came out of the Podesta emails and there is zero hard evidence of any crime connected to Podesta.
The closest they get is Silsby who got arrested in Haiti. They make a giant deal out of this, but there zero evidence anyone in Washington, DC, even knew who Silsby was before she was arrested. This was one of the things the hoaxers at the beginning of this, the same ones who faked the code word list pushed hard. They were hoping that people were ignorant of one of the functions of the State Department, consular services for Americans arrested abroad. And they were right. People act like the State Department got involved because Clinton knew this woman. It's quite clear from the emails, that nobody knew who these people were at first. Only that this was a case of an American getting arrested, actually 10 Americans getting arrested, Baptist Missionaries to boot. Consular services that any Secretary of State would provide.
When the mainstream media talks about pizzagate being instantly debunked, it's because if you know about things, this evidence falls apart on sight.
I have been on this board asking for months what evidence do they have that would even support probable cause, let alone show a crime occurred. Nobody has been able to come up with anything close to hard.
A girl smiling on instagram with masking tape on her arms is not evidence of a crime. People have already made up their minds though.
How can you deny the mountain of circumstantial evidence , no amount of money could be worth protecting sadistic child killers, unless your one of them.
because you have mountains and mountains and mountains all built on tissue thin speculation and the speculation that kicked off was deliberate deception.
And zero evidence of any crime. None. Zero. Zip. You aren't even in the ballpark of getting to sadisitic child killers. That's in your mind. It's nowhere near the evidence.
view the rest of the comments →
TrueAmerican ago
But what is considered the Hard Evidence? Is there a video of someone caught in the act of pedophilia? I dont understand how hard evidence can be dismissed. Is there actual evidence that would hold up in a court of law? Can someone just go present the evidence to a lawyer, open a lawsuit against the alleged perpetrators and see them in court?
Are_we__sure ago
There is no hard evidence. They keep trying to change the meaning once they strike out, but Pizzagate came out of the Podesta emails and there is zero hard evidence of any crime connected to Podesta.
The closest they get is Silsby who got arrested in Haiti. They make a giant deal out of this, but there zero evidence anyone in Washington, DC, even knew who Silsby was before she was arrested. This was one of the things the hoaxers at the beginning of this, the same ones who faked the code word list pushed hard. They were hoping that people were ignorant of one of the functions of the State Department, consular services for Americans arrested abroad. And they were right. People act like the State Department got involved because Clinton knew this woman. It's quite clear from the emails, that nobody knew who these people were at first. Only that this was a case of an American getting arrested, actually 10 Americans getting arrested, Baptist Missionaries to boot. Consular services that any Secretary of State would provide.
When the mainstream media talks about pizzagate being instantly debunked, it's because if you know about things, this evidence falls apart on sight.
I have been on this board asking for months what evidence do they have that would even support probable cause, let alone show a crime occurred. Nobody has been able to come up with anything close to hard.
A girl smiling on instagram with masking tape on her arms is not evidence of a crime. People have already made up their minds though.
Shillaxe ago
How can you deny the mountain of circumstantial evidence , no amount of money could be worth protecting sadistic child killers, unless your one of them.
Are_we__sure ago
because you have mountains and mountains and mountains all built on tissue thin speculation and the speculation that kicked off was deliberate deception.
And zero evidence of any crime. None. Zero. Zip. You aren't even in the ballpark of getting to sadisitic child killers. That's in your mind. It's nowhere near the evidence.