You were posting an article from December. Did you not see that?
And the fact that he had an IMDB page is incredibly weak evidence for the claims they are making. In fact, he acted in zero of films mentioned in their screenshot.
One of those films, Mute, was a college production. He has one onscreen credit for The Bleeding. Actually let me correct that. He has zero onscreen credits. He was uncredited in this movie. That means he was background. He was an extra.
Edgar Maddison Welch ... Raver / Victim (uncredited)
That's his last credit outside of a film he did for school. It was 8 years ago. That's it that's what the whole false flag conspiracy is resting on.
Among other things wrong on that page.....is this Jeff Koons picture they are trying to portray as something akin to child porn
and this (black square added over a man penetrating what appears to be a very small female’s vagina):
The woman in that Jeff Koons picture was his wife and she was 40 years old at the time and she's 5'6". So I think that would be MILF porn.
They get David Brock's backstory wrong
David Brock, the Democratic political operative who was chosen to run Media Matters by none other than John Podesta.......Brock got his start in Dem politics through disgraced former Congressman Barney Frank.......Brock used to lean conservative; the whole reason he switched to Democrat is because of Frank.
This is unbelievably stupid and dishonest and it shows they don't think much of the audience. It's stupid, because all this is publicly known and if you lived though it and paid attention to politics back then, it was pretty thoroughly discussed. Brock wrote lots of articles and a memoir about this.
Brock needed Barney Frank to get involved with Politics?
Brock was a famous Washington insider for a decade before that picture was taken. He was hired as a political writer while still in college in 1980s. He was part of the political machinations that got Bill Clinton impeached. Paula Jones first came forward because she wanted to sue him for defamation. The folks he worked with convinced her there would be more money if she sued Bill Clinton with their help. This made him a superstar in the conservative movement in the 1990s.
He wrote a best-seller attacking Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas hearings. This helped him get a million dollar advance for his book on Hillary Clinton. His Clinton book was sympathetic, because when he looked into the charges against her, he saw they were unfounded. He also knew and worked closely with many of the folks making the charges against her. He was soon shunned by the conservative movement and fired from his $300,000 year writing job and all of sudden the party invites stopped coming and his friends wouldn't talk to him. He then did a big mea culpa article and started writing about conservatives. None of this was because of Barney Frank.
Podesta did not pick Brock to head Media Matters. Brock founded Media Matters and pitched to Democratic big wigs including Hillary Clinton and Podesta as a way for the left of center to catch up to the think-tank/pressure group infrastructure of the political right of center. It was Brock's idea and he was attempting to create something that already existed and was well funded on the conservative side of the aisle. For example Accuracy in Media was already over 30 years old by the time Media Matters started.
You sure do speak about these things fluidly as if you were present when all this occurred. Did you work closely with Brock and his associates or write a biography about them? I mean Jesus, you seem to know a lot about his intentions, context for decisions he made and even his thought process spanning his entire career. I find it hard to believe you can recall all of this from a memoir he wrote, even if you just sat the book down after binge reading. Obscure choice of reading material unless your majoring in political psychology or something similar.
What do you think is more likely? I worked with Brock and wrote a biography of him
Or perhaps I was alive in the 1990's and I know how to use wikipedia and google.
The central fact of Brock's life was he started out as a dishonest attack dog on the right, had a big political conversion, and then started working on the opposite side of the street with the very targets of his attacks. Anyone who read political websites or blogs from that time knows this story. The idea that Barney Frank gave him his break is ludicrous. It's like claiming Michael Jordan wasn't good at basketball until Phil Jackson became his coach.
view the rest of the comments →
SayWhatNOWAY ago
This has been known for months👍
http404 ago
My bad.. I didn't know about this
RweSure ago
You were posting an article from December. Did you not see that?
And the fact that he had an IMDB page is incredibly weak evidence for the claims they are making. In fact, he acted in zero of films mentioned in their screenshot.
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/2016-12-05_19-27-31.jpg
One of those films, Mute, was a college production. He has one onscreen credit for The Bleeding. Actually let me correct that. He has zero onscreen credits. He was uncredited in this movie. That means he was background. He was an extra.
That's his last credit outside of a film he did for school. It was 8 years ago. That's it that's what the whole false flag conspiracy is resting on.
Among other things wrong on that page.....is this Jeff Koons picture they are trying to portray as something akin to child porn
The woman in that Jeff Koons picture was his wife and she was 40 years old at the time and she's 5'6". So I think that would be MILF porn.
They get David Brock's backstory wrong
This is unbelievably stupid and dishonest and it shows they don't think much of the audience. It's stupid, because all this is publicly known and if you lived though it and paid attention to politics back then, it was pretty thoroughly discussed. Brock wrote lots of articles and a memoir about this.
Brock needed Barney Frank to get involved with Politics? Brock was a famous Washington insider for a decade before that picture was taken. He was hired as a political writer while still in college in 1980s. He was part of the political machinations that got Bill Clinton impeached. Paula Jones first came forward because she wanted to sue him for defamation. The folks he worked with convinced her there would be more money if she sued Bill Clinton with their help. This made him a superstar in the conservative movement in the 1990s.
He wrote a best-seller attacking Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas hearings. This helped him get a million dollar advance for his book on Hillary Clinton. His Clinton book was sympathetic, because when he looked into the charges against her, he saw they were unfounded. He also knew and worked closely with many of the folks making the charges against her. He was soon shunned by the conservative movement and fired from his $300,000 year writing job and all of sudden the party invites stopped coming and his friends wouldn't talk to him. He then did a big mea culpa article and started writing about conservatives. None of this was because of Barney Frank.
Podesta did not pick Brock to head Media Matters. Brock founded Media Matters and pitched to Democratic big wigs including Hillary Clinton and Podesta as a way for the left of center to catch up to the think-tank/pressure group infrastructure of the political right of center. It was Brock's idea and he was attempting to create something that already existed and was well funded on the conservative side of the aisle. For example Accuracy in Media was already over 30 years old by the time Media Matters started.
fuckfacemcgee ago
You sure do speak about these things fluidly as if you were present when all this occurred. Did you work closely with Brock and his associates or write a biography about them? I mean Jesus, you seem to know a lot about his intentions, context for decisions he made and even his thought process spanning his entire career. I find it hard to believe you can recall all of this from a memoir he wrote, even if you just sat the book down after binge reading. Obscure choice of reading material unless your majoring in political psychology or something similar.
RweSure ago
OOOOOOOH suspicion.
What do you think is more likely? I worked with Brock and wrote a biography of him
Or perhaps I was alive in the 1990's and I know how to use wikipedia and google.
The central fact of Brock's life was he started out as a dishonest attack dog on the right, had a big political conversion, and then started working on the opposite side of the street with the very targets of his attacks. Anyone who read political websites or blogs from that time knows this story. The idea that Barney Frank gave him his break is ludicrous. It's like claiming Michael Jordan wasn't good at basketball until Phil Jackson became his coach.