I've been saying for a while that indirect attacks are our best chance at achieving our goals. It may even require deceptive means, but nothing immoral or even illegal necessarily.
Example: Expose 9/11 by pretending to be outraged by substandard building codes. But NEVER even hint at any conspiracy.
Ideally the target of any similar strategy would be twice separated from your true target. In this way, an advantageous scenario is formed. You and the people you oppose never become established as enemies and your target is less likely to have developed any defense against your attack vector.
view the rest of the comments →
Tyranny-News-Network ago
I've been saying for a while that indirect attacks are our best chance at achieving our goals. It may even require deceptive means, but nothing immoral or even illegal necessarily.
Example: Expose 9/11 by pretending to be outraged by substandard building codes. But NEVER even hint at any conspiracy.
Ideally the target of any similar strategy would be twice separated from your true target. In this way, an advantageous scenario is formed. You and the people you oppose never become established as enemies and your target is less likely to have developed any defense against your attack vector.