You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Pizzalawyer ago

Why does David need to do original research in order to be credible? It's great to have someone sift through material and separate the good from the bad evidence. So he finds good research that we may overlook. Ideally he should be giving credit to the original researcher. David also does pedo news analysis and that's another important function a journalist/commentator can perform. When he's not talking about himself, he provides some very robust insight into matters. So why don't we just appreciate him for the talents he does have and quit harping on his limitations which we all have.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

Thank you! I've been saying this about numerous YouTubers that get shit on perpetually here on Voat. Literally every single YouTube channel that discusses this topic with a high follower count is instantly labeled as a shill. Whether or not they do original research.

People need to respect the simple fact that this is exposing more people to our combined efforts. Is everything 100% accurate? Maybe not. Is everything 1st party research? Maybe not.

But you've got douche bags posting every image of a swirl they can find and getting commended for it, discovering absolutely nothing else in terms of meaningful evidence, it never gets a single dot connected to another data point, and that is somehow upvoated like crazy with people saying "Great find!"... it's totally ridiculous.

V____Z ago

Voat is overcome with trolls - little of what you see here is organic, it's manipulated. Some of the most prolific commenters/posters are complete shills who want nothing more than to kill this investigation.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

It is incredible, and disturbing. I think it's time for a visit back to the original files. I feel like we've come so far from them. Like a pack of hungry wolves that chased rabbits into the woods, forgetting that we were living near a herd of deer for a solid month.

UnicornAndSparkles ago

Would love to start delving back into old subs and comments. How and where would we begin?

V____Z ago

I would love nothing more than this.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

I spent time backtracking to the FBI Anons... the issue is that even a lot of the original images that were archived, have been jeopardized. I would love to crack into some of the previously implicated social media profiles, but, spending a few hours on this last night, it seems that most have gone into hiding.

I'll keep digging into Wikileaks. I'm going to spend time on the collection of Podesta emails that were unindexed.