Oh George.....You realize that this lawsuit wont even make it to a courtroom right? I doubt any lawyer would even touch it.
You have no case. Period. Just another drama distraction because you are stuck in Ohio now that your license has been suspended.
Defamation by the FBI? How? The FBI has made no statement on any media forum even mentioning your name. Nor the terms "conspiracy theorist" or that you were even the one who made the call in. They didnt even arrest you, simply questioned you and moved on.
Entrapment? They tricked you to get shitfaced before you ran after your big source? Really? You cant prove that the source was a FBI agent trying to lure you into a trap. In addition, they didnt have to...they already had cause to detain you.
Hey kids...so George was taking a nap in his car, huh? A half a mile away from his hotel...that makes sense. He was clearly under the influence when they nabbed him, so how did the car get there in that parking lot? Did he walk it on a leash? Carry it on his back? No..he drove it there....under the influence. He didnt get tipsy after he pulled into the parking lot for bedtime. Did the FBI make that happen?
So George, the Times called you a conspiracy theorist...but you are one. You have "working theories" (one of your favorite sayings) about a network of hidden forces involved in just about every evil imaginable. You pontificate about three brothers CONSPIRING in evil car dealerships, dirty bombs, blackmailing politicians. Basically conspiracies. YOU ARE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST!
This is so laughable and will be tossed out in the early stages. Which is too bad actually, because i would love to see him cross examined.
"Mr. Sweigert, have you or any immediate member of your family ever been treated for any type of mental illness?" Then we bring out Dad's medical records.
"Mr. Sweigert, is it true that you believe Andrew McCabe has been targeting you for close to a decade and moving objects around in your house? Do you have evidence of this?"
"Mr. Sweigert, is it true you believed that a pair of SEIU hitmen were sent to a hotel to assassinate you? These men were African American, yes? Were you harmed or impeded in any way?"
"Have made other such similiar claims in videos posted on your youtube involving people following you? A biker at a foot stand for instance? Men walking in your vicinity? Has any of these incidents led to an action against your person?"
Just building up his paranois narrative would be a blast. Incidentally, what is the 100 M for exactly. Do he have a business that has been damaged? A job that has been lost? What reputation did he think he had before this? Too funny.
As if he has a chance in hell of ever seeing it. There is no case here. Just another Webb publicity stunt. Ive already outlined it for you, unless you can respond to that.. you are nothing but a sheep...another drone...a mindless shill.
And none of that is relevant to Webb's case which was the topic on hand. Stay focused. I know that bad back and relapse into drinking is killer, but try to stay on topic.
The fraud within the Clinton Foundation cluster fuck is massive. Parts of it intersect with the upcoming class action suit. If you watched all the George Webb videos you'd realize that. And no I'm not going to tell you what applies and what doesn't. You need to start doing your own homework for once.
"and relapse into drinking"
Actually if I was drinking I wouldn't be doing this that's for sure. In fact the whole reason I'm here is because I no longer drink.
God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
Courage to change the things I can,
And wisdom to know the difference.
Lol. I have watched all of George:s videos. Including the ones he deleted (and lied about). The simple answer is..who cares? Doesnt pertain to defamation or entrapment and his circumstantial and speculative gimick is going to be laughed out of a court room. Sorry.
Says the one with zero retort. I doubt you even watch his videos or even look into his metadata..just parrot away. That is why no one takes you seriously.
Im a New Yorker. That part is true. Nope, i lean towards the conservatives, if anything just because I do a lot of work to promote 2nd Amendment rights....sorry, guess that wasnt what you wanted to hear.
Actually it was. At least you have some goodness in you. My advice is to cultivate the goodness and use it to find the truth. You're not even in the same zip code right now.
I never said the Clintons and Podesta arent corrupt or evil. I hate them as much as the next, but i wont back up a guy who is phony and a liar, making up nonsense to pretend hei is out get them. Im not going to fall into that confirmation bias wormhole just because we supposedly have a mutual enemy.
He lies and cherrypicks information that fits hits narrative and casually dismisses any that might contradict it. Takes data out of context and is lazy with the practical and boring, but important aspects of his research (in particular his knowledge of laws, history, and law enforcement procedures). He is too concerned with keeping up daily appearances that he rushes it on camera without vetting his information. He forgets to clarify what he considers just a theory and what is fact and this misleads his viewers and confuses them when he offers something completely opposite. He treats his channel as a notebook dump and for the gravity of the topics he is covering...that is dangerous given how impressionable his followers appear to be. Investigations simply do not happen at the pace he moves along with. Too much like a reality show and that is distressing.
His worst sin is that he is more than willing to falsify events and lie to push his narrative forward. Three months ago, I was witness to one of these events, watched it as it was recorded, watched him lie straight into the camera about where he was, what he was doing, and why he was there. It sickened me and Ive been out to expose him ever since.
Now..i dont expect anyone to take my word for anything. Who am I, right? Totally fair. I believe his own mouth and the videos he posts once they are put under a vetting lens is more than enough to get the job done. MSM is corrupt and full of liars. We all accept that, but i dont believe fighting fire with fire is the answer, fighting a fake news media with another fake news media. I want people to know that George Webb is not the hero anyone was hoping for.
"rushes it on camera without vetting his information."
George Webb is single handidly taking on the Deep State. He's allowed to put out "working theory". GW even says only 80% is proven the other 20% is "working theory". But that's ok, that's how you solve puzzles. You make assumptions and see if the pieces fit. If they don't you go back to the beginning. GW isn't doing anything out of the ordinary.
"watched him lie straight into the camera about where he was, what he was doing, and why he was there."
I'm glad you brought this up because I've noticed it to. There's a very good reason for GW to throw some shade at times. He's taking on the Deep State alone. Again the head fake is a well worn investigative tool.
The problem is you're holding GW to too high a standard. He's not a journalist nor is he a private eye. He's sells software in the IT industry. You can't hold him to the same standard as a journalist or investigator.
What blows my mind is people don't want to cut the guy some slack. The FBI is totally comprimised. It's fucking useless. When the wars over there's a distinct possibility Andrew McCabe, James Comey and Robert Mueller will hang by the neck until dead. This is playing for keeps. This is the real fucking deal. Those three shit birds are committing High Treason on a daily basis. Agreed?
view the rest of the comments →
Coco-Hamilton ago
Oh George.....You realize that this lawsuit wont even make it to a courtroom right? I doubt any lawyer would even touch it.
You have no case. Period. Just another drama distraction because you are stuck in Ohio now that your license has been suspended.
Defamation by the FBI? How? The FBI has made no statement on any media forum even mentioning your name. Nor the terms "conspiracy theorist" or that you were even the one who made the call in. They didnt even arrest you, simply questioned you and moved on.
Entrapment? They tricked you to get shitfaced before you ran after your big source? Really? You cant prove that the source was a FBI agent trying to lure you into a trap. In addition, they didnt have to...they already had cause to detain you.
Hey kids...so George was taking a nap in his car, huh? A half a mile away from his hotel...that makes sense. He was clearly under the influence when they nabbed him, so how did the car get there in that parking lot? Did he walk it on a leash? Carry it on his back? No..he drove it there....under the influence. He didnt get tipsy after he pulled into the parking lot for bedtime. Did the FBI make that happen?
So George, the Times called you a conspiracy theorist...but you are one. You have "working theories" (one of your favorite sayings) about a network of hidden forces involved in just about every evil imaginable. You pontificate about three brothers CONSPIRING in evil car dealerships, dirty bombs, blackmailing politicians. Basically conspiracies. YOU ARE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST!
This is so laughable and will be tossed out in the early stages. Which is too bad actually, because i would love to see him cross examined.
"Mr. Sweigert, have you or any immediate member of your family ever been treated for any type of mental illness?" Then we bring out Dad's medical records.
"Mr. Sweigert, is it true that you believe Andrew McCabe has been targeting you for close to a decade and moving objects around in your house? Do you have evidence of this?"
"Mr. Sweigert, is it true you believed that a pair of SEIU hitmen were sent to a hotel to assassinate you? These men were African American, yes? Were you harmed or impeded in any way?"
"Have made other such similiar claims in videos posted on your youtube involving people following you? A biker at a foot stand for instance? Men walking in your vicinity? Has any of these incidents led to an action against your person?"
Just building up his paranois narrative would be a blast. Incidentally, what is the 100 M for exactly. Do he have a business that has been damaged? A job that has been lost? What reputation did he think he had before this? Too funny.
DarkMath ago
I stopped at "I doubt any lawyer would even touch it."
You're not very bright are you Coco.
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
Yep..a video showing another who wont be taking his case..good catch.
You didnt stop reading Darkmeth. You read the whole thing...you just dont have a retortl as usual.
DarkMath ago
"who wont be taking his case"
Really? $50 Million seems like a lot of money no?
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
As if he has a chance in hell of ever seeing it. There is no case here. Just another Webb publicity stunt. Ive already outlined it for you, unless you can respond to that.. you are nothing but a sheep...another drone...a mindless shill.
DarkMath ago
"Just another Webb publicity stunt."
The JTTF isn't a myth dipshit. Nor is the cluster fuck of crimes within the Clinton Foundation fiction.
Please watch Clinton Cash then come back here and apologize.
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
And none of that is relevant to Webb's case which was the topic on hand. Stay focused. I know that bad back and relapse into drinking is killer, but try to stay on topic.
DarkMath ago
"none of that is relevant to Webb's case"
The fraud within the Clinton Foundation cluster fuck is massive. Parts of it intersect with the upcoming class action suit. If you watched all the George Webb videos you'd realize that. And no I'm not going to tell you what applies and what doesn't. You need to start doing your own homework for once.
"and relapse into drinking"
Actually if I was drinking I wouldn't be doing this that's for sure. In fact the whole reason I'm here is because I no longer drink.
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
Lol. I have watched all of George:s videos. Including the ones he deleted (and lied about). The simple answer is..who cares? Doesnt pertain to defamation or entrapment and his circumstantial and speculative gimick is going to be laughed out of a court room. Sorry.
DarkMath ago
Sorry. You didn't convince me.
But we already knew you're not very bright. Remember?
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
Says the one with zero retort. I doubt you even watch his videos or even look into his metadata..just parrot away. That is why no one takes you seriously.
DarkMath ago
Sorry Coco. I can't fix your stupid.
Maybe try reading more? I don't know. The cure for your idiocy depends on whether you're a shill or not.
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
Where is your rebuttal?
DarkMath ago
Up your ass.
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
Heh..you lose Chi chi.
DarkMath ago
Keep telling yourself that Coco if it makes you feel better.
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
Arent you supposed to ask me what my plan is to deal with Andrew McCabe?
DarkMath ago
Was that a joke? Please tell me that wasn't a joke.
Coco-Hamilton ago
Exactly.
DarkMath ago
Coco are you one of the New Yorkers who celebrated Trump being assassinated on stage during Shakespeare in the Park's production of Julius Caesar?
Coco-Hamilton ago
Im a New Yorker. That part is true. Nope, i lean towards the conservatives, if anything just because I do a lot of work to promote 2nd Amendment rights....sorry, guess that wasnt what you wanted to hear.
DarkMath ago
Actually it was. At least you have some goodness in you. My advice is to cultivate the goodness and use it to find the truth. You're not even in the same zip code right now.
:-D
Coco-Hamilton ago
I never said the Clintons and Podesta arent corrupt or evil. I hate them as much as the next, but i wont back up a guy who is phony and a liar, making up nonsense to pretend hei is out get them. Im not going to fall into that confirmation bias wormhole just because we supposedly have a mutual enemy.
DarkMath ago
"making up nonsense"
Like what?
Coco-Hamilton ago
He lies and cherrypicks information that fits hits narrative and casually dismisses any that might contradict it. Takes data out of context and is lazy with the practical and boring, but important aspects of his research (in particular his knowledge of laws, history, and law enforcement procedures). He is too concerned with keeping up daily appearances that he rushes it on camera without vetting his information. He forgets to clarify what he considers just a theory and what is fact and this misleads his viewers and confuses them when he offers something completely opposite. He treats his channel as a notebook dump and for the gravity of the topics he is covering...that is dangerous given how impressionable his followers appear to be. Investigations simply do not happen at the pace he moves along with. Too much like a reality show and that is distressing.
His worst sin is that he is more than willing to falsify events and lie to push his narrative forward. Three months ago, I was witness to one of these events, watched it as it was recorded, watched him lie straight into the camera about where he was, what he was doing, and why he was there. It sickened me and Ive been out to expose him ever since.
Now..i dont expect anyone to take my word for anything. Who am I, right? Totally fair. I believe his own mouth and the videos he posts once they are put under a vetting lens is more than enough to get the job done. MSM is corrupt and full of liars. We all accept that, but i dont believe fighting fire with fire is the answer, fighting a fake news media with another fake news media. I want people to know that George Webb is not the hero anyone was hoping for.
DarkMath ago
"rushes it on camera without vetting his information."
George Webb is single handidly taking on the Deep State. He's allowed to put out "working theory". GW even says only 80% is proven the other 20% is "working theory". But that's ok, that's how you solve puzzles. You make assumptions and see if the pieces fit. If they don't you go back to the beginning. GW isn't doing anything out of the ordinary.
"watched him lie straight into the camera about where he was, what he was doing, and why he was there."
I'm glad you brought this up because I've noticed it to. There's a very good reason for GW to throw some shade at times. He's taking on the Deep State alone. Again the head fake is a well worn investigative tool.
The problem is you're holding GW to too high a standard. He's not a journalist nor is he a private eye. He's sells software in the IT industry. You can't hold him to the same standard as a journalist or investigator.
What blows my mind is people don't want to cut the guy some slack. The FBI is totally comprimised. It's fucking useless. When the wars over there's a distinct possibility Andrew McCabe, James Comey and Robert Mueller will hang by the neck until dead. This is playing for keeps. This is the real fucking deal. Those three shit birds are committing High Treason on a daily basis. Agreed?