Actualy, it was the House Democrats who sent a petition to podesta
In 2002 GOP Majority Whip Steve Scalise spoke at a rally sponsored by former KKK leader, David Duke. It's time for Scalise to step down as GOP Majority Whip.
Scalise described himself as David Duke without the baggage. Didn't deserve to shot, but there's nothing wrong with calling for his resignation from House leadership
Thank you Are_we_sure - I see it was the Democrats House Majority PAC requesting Podesta to sign the petition for Scalise to resign, I wonder if there is any way to see if he did sign. I posted the discussion in the hopes other people could add to the 'bad blood' between Podesta and Scalise, it builds a better picture of whats going on. Thanks to waxdino below this picture is starting to form.
Where's your evidence the shooter even targeted Scalise?
Reports today stated the guy had a list in his pocket with names on it. Was Fox I saw it on so who knows but they had like 6 names and pictures up. I haven't seen the actual list tho,
If this guy was experienced​ with weapons this could have been much much uglier
Edit from Daily caller
The list of names included Alabama Rep. Mo Brooks, South Carolina Rep. Jeff Duncan and Arizona Rep. Trent Franks, TheDC has confirmed. Fox News reported after this story that Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, Tennessee Rep. Scott DesJarlais and Virginia Rep. Morgan Griffith are also on the list. All six congressmen are members of the House Freedom Caucus
He also apparently linked to an antiScalise political cartoon on Facebook
Ah I see you listen to the MSM narrative trying to pushing him all about being a Berni guy, they are diverting. The link I think between Podesta and Scalise is that allegedly Podesta is a pedophile and Scalise announced he was determined to get the pedophiles/human traffickers off the street.
The MSM narrative??? Is that what you call the facts you don't want to hear?
This man volunteered for Bernie in Iowa, that was confirmed by the Sanders campaign and Bernie Sanders himself issued a statement on it. For you to say different is simply false.
He was not a paid member of the campaign, he wasn't well known, but he definitely was for Bernie.
Judging by his social media his two biggest political positions were strongly Anti-Trump and strongly pro-Bernie. His motivating cause seemed to be the 99% and the 1%. He was against tax cuts for the rich and pro universal healthcare
He was also an alcoholic and abusive guy for much longer than he was politically angry. Previous violent behavior is a way bigger predictor of political violence than ideology is. Ideology influences who a violent actor targets, not if they are violent.
To be honest I believe MSM 1% of the time and DO NOT believe them 99% of the time. (maybe once in a blue moon they make a mistake and let a TRUTH slip out!) I find them TOTALLY discredited and bias in my opinion. You of course are allowed your own opinion, but you will find yourself to be included in a dying minority believing them. Btw I did not ever say 'I don't want to hear FACTS, I love FACTS, BUT THEY HAVE TO BE THE TRUTH TO BE THE FACTS I AM INTERESTED IN.
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we_sure ago
Actualy, it was the House Democrats who sent a petition to podesta
Scalise described himself as David Duke without the baggage. Didn't deserve to shot, but there's nothing wrong with calling for his resignation from House leadership
TrishaUK ago
Thank you Are_we_sure - I see it was the Democrats House Majority PAC requesting Podesta to sign the petition for Scalise to resign, I wonder if there is any way to see if he did sign. I posted the discussion in the hopes other people could add to the 'bad blood' between Podesta and Scalise, it builds a better picture of whats going on. Thanks to waxdino below this picture is starting to form.
Are_we_sure ago
How does this build a better picture of anything?
You're implying podesta had something to so with the shooting? Based on what?
Where's your evidence the shooter even targeted Scalise? Wasn't the shooter quite anti-Hillary?
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Anti-HillPedo đź‘„ I do not believe that BS for a minute! This idiot freak has all the making of a MK Ultra Clinton gopher!
Trumpocrat2020 ago
Reports today stated the guy had a list in his pocket with names on it. Was Fox I saw it on so who knows but they had like 6 names and pictures up. I haven't seen the actual list tho,
Are_we_sure ago
I heard 3, but I heard that too.
If this guy was experienced​ with weapons this could have been much much uglier
Edit from Daily caller
He also apparently linked to an antiScalise political cartoon on Facebook
TrishaUK ago
Ah I see you listen to the MSM narrative trying to pushing him all about being a Berni guy, they are diverting. The link I think between Podesta and Scalise is that allegedly Podesta is a pedophile and Scalise announced he was determined to get the pedophiles/human traffickers off the street.
Are_we_sure ago
The MSM narrative??? Is that what you call the facts you don't want to hear?
This man volunteered for Bernie in Iowa, that was confirmed by the Sanders campaign and Bernie Sanders himself issued a statement on it. For you to say different is simply false.
He was not a paid member of the campaign, he wasn't well known, but he definitely was for Bernie.
Judging by his social media his two biggest political positions were strongly Anti-Trump and strongly pro-Bernie. His motivating cause seemed to be the 99% and the 1%. He was against tax cuts for the rich and pro universal healthcare
He donated a small amount of money to Bernie via the PAC Actblue https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?two_year_transaction_period=2016&contributor_name=James+Hodgkinson&min_date=01%2F01%2F2015&max_date=12%2F31%2F2016
He was also an alcoholic and abusive guy for much longer than he was politically angry. Previous violent behavior is a way bigger predictor of political violence than ideology is. Ideology influences who a violent actor targets, not if they are violent.
TrishaUK ago
To be honest I believe MSM 1% of the time and DO NOT believe them 99% of the time. (maybe once in a blue moon they make a mistake and let a TRUTH slip out!) I find them TOTALLY discredited and bias in my opinion. You of course are allowed your own opinion, but you will find yourself to be included in a dying minority believing them. Btw I did not ever say 'I don't want to hear FACTS, I love FACTS, BUT THEY HAVE TO BE THE TRUTH TO BE THE FACTS I AM INTERESTED IN.
Are_we_sure ago
How are facts not truth? Aren't they, by definition true? What determines what facts you are interested in?
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fact
To the previous point, do you acknowledge that the Bernie Sanders campaign confirmed this man volunteered with them?