In_Umbris, Thank you for your very civil comment. If only all posters had your tact and sensibility when raising concerns. It will be a pleasure to respond.
In this world, the number of people who are inclined to put everything they have on the line in order to combat the satanic evil at the top of the world’s power structure and are independently wealthy enough to self finance any endeavor to counter this evil, is exceedingly small. And even if those so inclined were independently wealthy and could finance their own battlefront, why would we be disappointed if they still chose to look for ways to finance the endeavor? Why would we impose such a handicap on the good side as to suggest the only people who qualify to help prosecute this war must do so exclusively with their own time and money? Why should it be impermissible for good hearted people who have a few dollars to spare but not the time, to instead give someone like a Craig Sawyer a few dollars to help him act on their behalf?
The history of the world has at times been written by mercenaries, who had no real interest in who won the war, as long as it was the side that was paying them. If mercenaries could turn the tide in this particular war against satanic pedophiles running the world (which is the most important war raging at the moment) why on God’s good green earth would we turn down the opportunity to hire some?
Having said that, I don’t think Sawyer is remotely attempting to position himself as a false mercenary (as some say) in this particular war, i.e., someone who will feign to battle satanic pedophiles just for profit. My intuition tells me he loathes these demons and wants to do something about them, but is simultaneously faced with the reality of his current financial situation.
Look, he can earn a living any one of a million different ways, or he can earn a living fighting demons. Why would anyone begrudge him or anyone else in his unique position the opportunity to earn enough to allow him to wage war against those demons? There is profound irony that there are perhaps 10 000 actors or people in the media of roughly the same stature as Sawyer who are earning a living not fighting pedophiles and would never remotely consider doing so, and yet there is no outcry whatsoever about them. In so far as not seeing tangible results as of yet, I would presume it will take some time for him to build and execute a battle plan. It just can’t be done in days or weeks like some imagine. Nothing of such magnitude can. I am willing to accord him the benefit of doubt.
The idea that we’re only going to trust people on the front line of this war is if they never ask or even hint for funding and must support themselves independently (in the event they're not wealthy) can only be described as shorted sighted. It’s major a tactical error. Were I walking headlong into the enemy and had to choose one party to march beside me, I’d take one Craig Sawyer (or someone like him) receiving a stipend over ten thousand keyboard clickers clicking in unison that no one is allowed to earn a dollar fighting pedophiles, and if they try, they’re sure gonna fix ‘em good and who believe they’re saving some kid in a dungeon somewhere if only they can keep a few more dollars out of Craig Sawyer’s war chest. In_Umbris, I don’t think your very well worded concerns fit into the category of people I just described. Here I am speaking to a different audience altogether.
view the rest of the comments →
rwb2 ago
In_Umbris, Thank you for your very civil comment. If only all posters had your tact and sensibility when raising concerns. It will be a pleasure to respond.
In this world, the number of people who are inclined to put everything they have on the line in order to combat the satanic evil at the top of the world’s power structure and are independently wealthy enough to self finance any endeavor to counter this evil, is exceedingly small. And even if those so inclined were independently wealthy and could finance their own battlefront, why would we be disappointed if they still chose to look for ways to finance the endeavor? Why would we impose such a handicap on the good side as to suggest the only people who qualify to help prosecute this war must do so exclusively with their own time and money? Why should it be impermissible for good hearted people who have a few dollars to spare but not the time, to instead give someone like a Craig Sawyer a few dollars to help him act on their behalf?
The history of the world has at times been written by mercenaries, who had no real interest in who won the war, as long as it was the side that was paying them. If mercenaries could turn the tide in this particular war against satanic pedophiles running the world (which is the most important war raging at the moment) why on God’s good green earth would we turn down the opportunity to hire some?
Having said that, I don’t think Sawyer is remotely attempting to position himself as a false mercenary (as some say) in this particular war, i.e., someone who will feign to battle satanic pedophiles just for profit. My intuition tells me he loathes these demons and wants to do something about them, but is simultaneously faced with the reality of his current financial situation.
Look, he can earn a living any one of a million different ways, or he can earn a living fighting demons. Why would anyone begrudge him or anyone else in his unique position the opportunity to earn enough to allow him to wage war against those demons? There is profound irony that there are perhaps 10 000 actors or people in the media of roughly the same stature as Sawyer who are earning a living not fighting pedophiles and would never remotely consider doing so, and yet there is no outcry whatsoever about them. In so far as not seeing tangible results as of yet, I would presume it will take some time for him to build and execute a battle plan. It just can’t be done in days or weeks like some imagine. Nothing of such magnitude can. I am willing to accord him the benefit of doubt.
The idea that we’re only going to trust people on the front line of this war is if they never ask or even hint for funding and must support themselves independently (in the event they're not wealthy) can only be described as shorted sighted. It’s major a tactical error. Were I walking headlong into the enemy and had to choose one party to march beside me, I’d take one Craig Sawyer (or someone like him) receiving a stipend over ten thousand keyboard clickers clicking in unison that no one is allowed to earn a dollar fighting pedophiles, and if they try, they’re sure gonna fix ‘em good and who believe they’re saving some kid in a dungeon somewhere if only they can keep a few more dollars out of Craig Sawyer’s war chest. In_Umbris, I don’t think your very well worded concerns fit into the category of people I just described. Here I am speaking to a different audience altogether.