Unless you have some actual evidence this is related to pizzagate, it doesn't pass Rule 1. All evidence indicates this was motivated by anti-Republican sentiment. The guy had protested with sign saying "Tax the Rich," and complaining about trickle-down economics. He literally asked the political party of the people on the field before he started shooting. The idea that he was specifically targeting Scalise makes no sense based on the situation. He hit him in the hip. Don't you think, if this were a professional hit-job, it would have been a plane-crash or a car crash, not some hapless dude shooting inaccurately from a distance? The confirmation bias here is insane.
view the rest of the comments →
HelpMeExpose ago
Millennial_Falcon deleted my original post of this. LEAVE IT UP
Millennial_Falcon ago
Unless you have some actual evidence this is related to pizzagate, it doesn't pass Rule 1. All evidence indicates this was motivated by anti-Republican sentiment. The guy had protested with sign saying "Tax the Rich," and complaining about trickle-down economics. He literally asked the political party of the people on the field before he started shooting. The idea that he was specifically targeting Scalise makes no sense based on the situation. He hit him in the hip. Don't you think, if this were a professional hit-job, it would have been a plane-crash or a car crash, not some hapless dude shooting inaccurately from a distance? The confirmation bias here is insane.