@darkmath, @dressage2, @jem777, Are yall' watching the trolls emerge from their lairs to push against George. The amount of vetted information in his work is impressive and I have watched my friends whom contribute on Voat fall for this defamation effort.
Yes, it is pathetic. As the guys said, they must be getting closer to the truth. Jason did a YT this am saying that it is really getting bad and Defango is hitting heavy on them. They have had great metadata to support their claims. If no metadata, he will say it is a working theory. @Darkmath@jangles, @jem777
Metadata. Go ahead. define this word because you and Webb clearly don't know what this means. Btw...Webb just admitted he has ZERO metadata on Seth Rich..,yet investigated it for a month and still gave us six different stories he proclaimed as fact and that he "solved" the case. Getting closer to the truth...or my other favorite Webb line "we are over the target". He has been over the target for fucking months and you clowns still buy it.
So I am suppose to take you as a credible source when you joined 12 days ago?!? What voice of authority are you? Y'all talk about Webb coming on the front in 2016. Twelve days is a joke. Move along.
Well, I don't know your age, but i gather most five year-olds have more to work with then you, but you have obviously been on the Earth longer. So i don't see how dick sizing about how long you have been on a message board is relevant. Pretty weak, actually. I guess if fucking Einstein come on here to comment on physics, you would just blow him off and say, "hey rookie...what do know...like your account is new...so...so...something". Yeah..that's how stupid you are and that makes sense. You have to be an idiot to worship at the altar of Webb. However, I did expect that response, empty, pointless, and shallow, because that is the only type of response Webb shills ever give.
But Coco Hamilton, you are no Einstein so you can get off that platform. I guess what I am trying to say is you are not so relevant yet. We don't pay much attention around here to less than two-week-old wannabes. Flex your muscles somewhere else or pay your dues before you shoot your mouth off to Posters that have been here a while longer. Some day you may be relevant until then mum's the word 😉
Pay your dues on a forum..okay...sure. When it comes to Webb, I am practically Einstein. I can assure you, I have a lot more insight from a lot closer view than you. You can either care about petty stupid shit like account creation (Wannabees? Wannabee what? This is your fucking ambition? LOLOLOL) or you can pay attention and learn a thing or two from people who are a lot ,more in the know than you. As far as I'm concerned...you are the rookie in my investigation..one I've been a part of for a long time.
Way too much work to put out all his metadata as he is on Day 231. If you are interested watch all his vids as he gives sources when he has them otherwise he asks for help finding info or that it is just his own theory.
Sources...like what? "Someone I spoke to told me....", "Gotta a hot tip..." Tell me what source was his big Guccifer 2.0 reveal? I mean...I see all you Webb drones coming out talking about Metadata and evidence and when you ask them for one piece of it...you get nothing. THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT WEBB IS FEEDING THEM! They just take his word for it.
With all due respect @Jangles, it's really not safe for anyone to be clicking on a Google docs link. You have to be signed in with your Google account, which is the most non-anon and unsafe thing one could do when involved in this type of material.
GW could easily paste-bin this information and make it safe for everyone who what's to access it. Who on earth asks people to access a Google Doc? Maybe GW is unaware how dangerous this is to his viewers / investigators, and if so someone should be setting him straight. This is completely dangerous.
Whoever accesses that Google Doc goes straight onto a list. Man... this is crazy.
On the other hand, I'd like to see GW's 'metadata' for myself. If he was to publish it in a safe way, I'd be very interested in seeing it, but like this, no freaking way.
view the rest of the comments →
jangles ago
@darkmath, @dressage2, @jem777, Are yall' watching the trolls emerge from their lairs to push against George. The amount of vetted information in his work is impressive and I have watched my friends whom contribute on Voat fall for this defamation effort.
Dressage2 ago
Yes, it is pathetic. As the guys said, they must be getting closer to the truth. Jason did a YT this am saying that it is really getting bad and Defango is hitting heavy on them. They have had great metadata to support their claims. If no metadata, he will say it is a working theory. @Darkmath @jangles, @jem777
Coco-Hamilton ago
Metadata. Go ahead. define this word because you and Webb clearly don't know what this means. Btw...Webb just admitted he has ZERO metadata on Seth Rich..,yet investigated it for a month and still gave us six different stories he proclaimed as fact and that he "solved" the case. Getting closer to the truth...or my other favorite Webb line "we are over the target". He has been over the target for fucking months and you clowns still buy it.
Dressage2 ago
So I am suppose to take you as a credible source when you joined 12 days ago?!? What voice of authority are you? Y'all talk about Webb coming on the front in 2016. Twelve days is a joke. Move along.
Coco-Hamilton ago
Well, I don't know your age, but i gather most five year-olds have more to work with then you, but you have obviously been on the Earth longer. So i don't see how dick sizing about how long you have been on a message board is relevant. Pretty weak, actually. I guess if fucking Einstein come on here to comment on physics, you would just blow him off and say, "hey rookie...what do know...like your account is new...so...so...something". Yeah..that's how stupid you are and that makes sense. You have to be an idiot to worship at the altar of Webb. However, I did expect that response, empty, pointless, and shallow, because that is the only type of response Webb shills ever give.
Dressage2 ago
But Coco Hamilton, you are no Einstein so you can get off that platform. I guess what I am trying to say is you are not so relevant yet. We don't pay much attention around here to less than two-week-old wannabes. Flex your muscles somewhere else or pay your dues before you shoot your mouth off to Posters that have been here a while longer. Some day you may be relevant until then mum's the word 😉
Coco-Hamilton ago
Hey, simple solution. I'm so irrelevant? Then ignore me. Right?
Coco-Hamilton ago
Pay your dues on a forum..okay...sure. When it comes to Webb, I am practically Einstein. I can assure you, I have a lot more insight from a lot closer view than you. You can either care about petty stupid shit like account creation (Wannabees? Wannabee what? This is your fucking ambition? LOLOLOL) or you can pay attention and learn a thing or two from people who are a lot ,more in the know than you. As far as I'm concerned...you are the rookie in my investigation..one I've been a part of for a long time.
Shillaxe ago
Your a Beast x 44 Hamilton Signed, Roscoe
privatepizza ago
With all due respect Dressage2, please post their 'metadata'.
Dressage2 ago
Way too much work to put out all his metadata as he is on Day 231. If you are interested watch all his vids as he gives sources when he has them otherwise he asks for help finding info or that it is just his own theory.
Coco-Hamilton ago
Sources...like what? "Someone I spoke to told me....", "Gotta a hot tip..." Tell me what source was his big Guccifer 2.0 reveal? I mean...I see all you Webb drones coming out talking about Metadata and evidence and when you ask them for one piece of it...you get nothing. THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT WEBB IS FEEDING THEM! They just take his word for it.
Dressage2 ago
Move along.
Coco-Hamilton ago
Lack of conviction...concession to my statement. Thank you.
Dressage2 ago
Keep convincing yourself of that.
Coco-Hamilton ago
Thank you, you are very humble.
Shillaxe ago
Damn
jangles ago
Here is a link that is on google docs
https://docs .google.com /presentation/d/1X2ZNdpHMx23Nm-pGZULrBbU6SxpfiNMId6KXqe3deIE/edit#slide=id.g1906d72a88_0_0
privatepizza ago
^^^ Do NOT CLICK ON THIS HONEYPOT LINK ^^^
With all due respect @Jangles, it's really not safe for anyone to be clicking on a Google docs link. You have to be signed in with your Google account, which is the most non-anon and unsafe thing one could do when involved in this type of material.
GW could easily paste-bin this information and make it safe for everyone who what's to access it. Who on earth asks people to access a Google Doc? Maybe GW is unaware how dangerous this is to his viewers / investigators, and if so someone should be setting him straight. This is completely dangerous.
Whoever accesses that Google Doc goes straight onto a list. Man... this is crazy.
On the other hand, I'd like to see GW's 'metadata' for myself. If he was to publish it in a safe way, I'd be very interested in seeing it, but like this, no freaking way.
jangles ago
Hide behind an anon, pussy.
privatepizza ago
Put yourself on the GW list, a nice one to be on when he faces espionage charges, duffer.