You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

RweSure ago

Who's Pushing ? Who's Pushing?

The former head of the FBI just testified under oath about the POTUS asking him to let an investigation go. He turned over his notes to the special prosecutor and said the special prosecutor will look into if that was part of a felony.

Who's is pushing this? The top levels of law enforcement in the United States and the coequal branch of government in the the Senate Intel Committee, and all of our executive branch Intel Agencies have agreed on Russian interference.

POTUS has now hired outside counsel because he realizes he needs a criminal defense. He also accused the Former head of the FBI of perjury.

This is not going away and there will be calls for POTUS to be put under oath to answer these charges.

The FBI director confirmed that Flynn has been in legal jeorpardy. He confirmed that Pence knew about Flynn all along. He further declined the chance to say POTUS did not collude with Russia.

“Do you believe Donald Trump colluded with Russia?” - Sen. Tom Cotton

“That’s a question I don’t think I should answer in an open setting. When I left, we did not have an investigation focused on President Trump. But that’s a question that will be answered by the investigation, I think.”

So the correct answer is the evidence is pushing this.

bopper ago

Lol, you're a mess. It's fun to see your posts though. Breaking from Zero Hedge.

"The Comey Congressional testimony was supposed to be a shocker. Instead, it turned out to be a big yawn with Democrats’ dreams of obstruction charges dashed. Headlines range from vindication to impeachment. They both cannot be correct."

RweSure ago

I'm a mess says the guy who reads zerohedge.

Headlines range from vindication to impeachment. They both cannot be correct."

Oooh. Insightful.

The president has been in office 5 months. There's a special prosecutor looking at him. This is a record. The National Security Advisor didn't last a month in office. Quickest a high level official has been tossed from office. NSA gone. VP, AG and President all have legal worries. Nixon was in office for years before Watergate hit. President admitted he fired the head of the FBI because of the investigation into Russian interference.

The special prosecutor has the authority to Look into related crimes like money laundering.

If you think this good news for the president, you're kidding yourself. The WH response was to bring out Trump's personal criminal defense lawyer to falsely accuse Comey of a crime.

bopper ago

It's funny, I guess it depends on where you get your "news." Zero Hedge is a great site.

You know you remind me of my two nutty in-laws who are democrat lobbyists. They've got so much invested that they're kinda blind. They hate Trump w/ a passion.

Ah, but you're smarter than that and I'm counting on you! At least maybe you'll admit this Russia stuff is woven out of whole cloth. Are you a lobbyist?

Edit: Just btw, you do know the Nixon thing was a coup by Bush right? You should read Russ Baker's book. Do you know I once had a chatty-do w/ Laura Bush? She was sweet.

AND FURTHERMORE! Trump fired Comey on a sudden and while gone so ding dong Comey couldn't retrieve anything from his office, it became property of DOJ. Now Trump is continuing to say he will release some tapes "shortly."

RweSure ago

Trump also said he would release his taxes. Trump also said there would be clear divisions between Trump Inc and the White House. Trump said he would have a plan to defeat ISIS. Trump says a lot of things. Why would you believe him? Comey called his bluff and welcomed the tapes. You still think we are going to see them?

At least maybe you'll admit this Russia stuff is woven out of whole cloth.

Not at all.

You will admit at the very least the Trump administration/campaign had an unusually high number of Russian connections/meetings, yes? And did not reveal these? Flynn who was fired for this. And Sessions did not reveal his meetings. Kushner met with Russian bank and then lied about this on his security clearance. Have looked into Felix Sater? The convicted gangster who worked for Trump Organization? Until it became public. Then helped finance Trump Soho and this year was able to get a plan to lift sanctions to the United States National Security Advisor through Trump's lawyer? Trump's lawyer's​ Soviet born business partner was just indicted for fraud.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/19/us/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-russia.amp.html

You think this is whole cloth? Do you think Flynn should still be in his job?

If the Nixon thing was a coup by Bush, how do you explain the hours and hours of Nixon tape? The fact that CIA told the the FBI to stand down on Nixon's orders? The confessions of the conspirators? You do know Haldeman admitting all this in his book, right?

Lobbyist? No. Other than voting I have no connection to Democratic party politics.

bopper ago

"Russia thing" I just mean that they allegedly interfered w/ the election. That narrative isn't working out too well for the dems. Nothing to it. Jury is still out on Flynn, who knows, but not a big deal to me. You probably still believe there was a real "deep throat" too. That was all nonsense, as were idiots Woodward and Bernstein.

Speaking of, why don't you check out this documentary (the book is better) and see what connections Ben Bradlee of the "great" WaPo, who was brother-in-law to Mary Pinchot Meyer, who was married to CIA Cord Meyer, had to the CIA. CIA murdered the woman cause of her affair w/ JFK and the knowledge she had. Ben Bradlee saw Angleton of CIA snooping for her diary on two different occasions and let it slide.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZjACabdnlE

RweSure ago

They absolutely interfered with the election. There is no doubt about that.

There no evidence yet, they hacked the votes. Those are two separate things.

The whole point of who they targeted and the coordinated release shows they wanted to interfere in the election.

Jury's out on Flynn? I assume you mean the lieral grand jury looking into his case. Do think he should still be in his job?

bopper ago

Oh well, Flynn is a lot less crooked than the idiot dems, so yeah, why not? Wouldn't bother me. Nobody's perfect.

What is your deal anyway, can't figure you out. I'll put you in touch w/ my in-law lobbyists. They refuse to open their eyes like you.

There is abundant youtube comments from various dems and intel saying it's a big nothing. Surely you know that.