Alright...I get it... RDS is a disinfo shill, Webb is a disinfo shill, Seaman is a disinfo shill, Jones is a disinfo shill... heck, even Assange has been implicated as a Depp State operative.
RDS has a very* insane plan to combine international powers and move towards a truly progressive society (based on science and actual progress... not the kind of BS "progressive" mindset that simply means giving more handouts).
Does he say things we don't agree with? Yes. Does he say some things that are flat out crazy? Yes.
But... every, fucking, video that ANYONE releases, the group here on Voat almost immediately calls it out as disinfo. What does that leave us with? We can trust no one? No source? No information? Everything is compromised?
I just don't get it. I still watch the Mainstream Media, to take notes on what their narrative is and to find a middle ground/logical summary of what is more likely to ACTUALLY be happening. Why can't we do the same with these sources that are tapping into information MUCH closer to what we all believe/want to uncover?
So... to those who have essentially labeled every single semi-popular fringe persona on the web as a "disinfo" agent. I ask you - who do YOU trust? A serious question, because, I'm getting a little sick of the perpetual shill-labeling when anyone on here posts a video, such as this one, that does contain some thought provoking ideology/concepts.
I'm fully assuming that by posting this, I too, will be called a shill. So, save your keystrokes if that's all you got.
I hear you and it's a bit of a minefield. Those people you listed are suspicious entities around here for good reason. I wish we didn't have to be so cynical of some people but we do.
I'm perfectly fine with cynicism... but it has become more than a minefield. It's now a lava pit... you can't share a source/reference/video without either being called a shill, or the source itself being questioned.
So, while I get it, and I look at everything through a critical lens - I'll ask again, what sources CAN we trust? Law enforcement and intel agencies aren't doing anything fast. Politicians are as corrupt as the media. Trump/Sessions don't seem to be applying a lot of pressure where we had hoped (at least not publicly)... so, outside of mobilizing a massive effort to hire private investigators, what information can we invest in?
Look for the channels that YT and Google are actively suppressing and you'll find the genuine truthers. As a rule of thumb, and from general observation, it is the ones that don't seem to have a problem that you need to be cautious with.
view the rest of the comments →
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Alright...I get it... RDS is a disinfo shill, Webb is a disinfo shill, Seaman is a disinfo shill, Jones is a disinfo shill... heck, even Assange has been implicated as a Depp State operative.
RDS has a very* insane plan to combine international powers and move towards a truly progressive society (based on science and actual progress... not the kind of BS "progressive" mindset that simply means giving more handouts).
Does he say things we don't agree with? Yes. Does he say some things that are flat out crazy? Yes.
But... every, fucking, video that ANYONE releases, the group here on Voat almost immediately calls it out as disinfo. What does that leave us with? We can trust no one? No source? No information? Everything is compromised?
I just don't get it. I still watch the Mainstream Media, to take notes on what their narrative is and to find a middle ground/logical summary of what is more likely to ACTUALLY be happening. Why can't we do the same with these sources that are tapping into information MUCH closer to what we all believe/want to uncover?
So... to those who have essentially labeled every single semi-popular fringe persona on the web as a "disinfo" agent. I ask you - who do YOU trust? A serious question, because, I'm getting a little sick of the perpetual shill-labeling when anyone on here posts a video, such as this one, that does contain some thought provoking ideology/concepts.
I'm fully assuming that by posting this, I too, will be called a shill. So, save your keystrokes if that's all you got.
dickface888 ago
I hear you and it's a bit of a minefield. Those people you listed are suspicious entities around here for good reason. I wish we didn't have to be so cynical of some people but we do.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
I'm perfectly fine with cynicism... but it has become more than a minefield. It's now a lava pit... you can't share a source/reference/video without either being called a shill, or the source itself being questioned.
So, while I get it, and I look at everything through a critical lens - I'll ask again, what sources CAN we trust? Law enforcement and intel agencies aren't doing anything fast. Politicians are as corrupt as the media. Trump/Sessions don't seem to be applying a lot of pressure where we had hoped (at least not publicly)... so, outside of mobilizing a massive effort to hire private investigators, what information can we invest in?
cantsleepawink ago
Look for the channels that YT and Google are actively suppressing and you'll find the genuine truthers. As a rule of thumb, and from general observation, it is the ones that don't seem to have a problem that you need to be cautious with.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Links? Recommendations?