You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SoldierofLight ago

Wow, not only does that Jon Stewart clip touch on snuff CP but also transhumanism as well as microchipping people.

Just found this reference to a TV show that Stephen Colbert did that I had never heard of, "Strangers with Candy" and yep, it's about what you think it is. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Colbert

Strangers with Candy was conceived of as a parody of after school specials, following the life of Jerri Blank, a 46-year-old dropout who returns to finish high school after 32 years of life on the street. Most noted by critics for its use of offensive humor, it concluded each episode by delivering to the audience a skewed, politically incorrect moral lesson.[38] Colbert served as a main writer alongside Sedaris and Dinello, and portrayed Jerri's strict but uninformed history teacher, Chuck Noblet, seen throughout the series dispensing inaccurate information to his classes. Colbert has likened this to the character he played on The Daily Show and later The Colbert Report, claiming that he has a very specific niche in portraying "poorly informed, high-status idiot" characters.[10] Another running joke throughout the series was that Noblet, a closeted homosexual, was having a "secret" affair with fellow teacher Geoffrey Jellineck, despite the fact that their relationship was apparent to everyone around them. This obliviousness also appears in Colbert's Daily Show and Colbert Report character.

Laskar ago

Look how few views this gets, no wonder people are leaving VOAT in droves.

I will not give up however.

SoldierofLight ago

Yes, and some fucktard downvoated you. I just cancelled them out with an upvoat. But as of this minute, 219 people have viewed your post. We don't know who they are-- among them may be people who can make a difference. Even if one of you folks who are reading this started spreading this information on your social media pages and/or in conversations with friends, and they start talking to their other friends, and so on, we can take these child rapists down. We outnumber them. We can hold them accountable but we have to stop being sheep.

Laskar ago

True.

and thanks for the upvote...have one yourself.

With only thirteen upvotes, it is obvious someone does not want this to be seen, when they even went so far as putting a five month old post on the fornt page to knock my post off of it.

SoldierofLight ago

There are a lot of BS and duplicate posts going up. They're working overtime to slide the posts that matter, like this one. I'm noticing a new pattern (to me anyway) whereby they take a noted fact from a previous thread and make a new one from that fact, but it's salacious in nature rather than investigative. It's like they're trying to turn this sub into the National Enquirer.

Laskar ago

I just upvoted and commented on the Dershowitz post which was at 20, so my vote made it 21. When I refreshed the page, it went down to 19, so I upvoted again and it went down again. This happened four times--with several minutes in between. Also noteworthy are the comments defending Dershowitz and we can imagine who wrote those.

I have a lot of research on that guy (and others) which I would never dare put on VOAT because of the extreme bias and censorship.

Still, if we keep throwing mud at the wall with lots of cases, incidents, and witness testimony, maybe some will stick.