I have spent over a thousand hours researching JonBenet. There are some very misleading statements in this article. For example:
"Innuendo of sexual abuse began to circulate, though no evidence was ever found to prove these allegations."
Untrue by definition because JonBenet's medical records have never been released. Investigators have had no access at all to them. Even though at the autopsy the coroner observed evidence of external sexual trauma, the subject and content of her frequent visits to the doctor remain a mystery.
My own (quite well informed) opinion: it was impossible for any intruder to enter the house through the basement window. There is considerable evidence that it was her brother Burke that knocked her unconscious with a flashlight to the back of the head and either he or Patsy strangled her afterwards.
The JonBenet case has nothing to do with Pizzagate. Don't waste your time.
A mother murdered her daughter? That makes absolutely no sense at all and reminds me of the disinfo put out regarding the Madeleine McCann case.
I don't know who killed JonBenet but there sure seems like an awful lot of disinfo getting put out surrounding it. The most egregious is John Mark Karr's story. Karr was unquestionably part of some sort of Finders ring in Thailand procuring children to grease the gears of Brownstone Operations, of that there is no question. His "admission" very conveniently brought him back to the U.S. at a time when Thai authorities were more than willing to go digging.
Therefor by deduction we can easily say there's most definitely pedophilia involved in the JonBenet case. John Mark Karr did that himself. And "my own (quite well informed) opinion" after reading up on the sordid shit for the past 6 months leads me to believe the pedophilia we see was part of a larger Brownstone Operation.
And that my friend means you're either full of shit or a useful idiot. Sorry, I don't make the rules.
A mother murdered her daughter? That makes absolutely no sense at all and reminds me of the disinfo put out regarding the Madeleine McCann case.
The two cases have nothing to do with each other.
Let's take a look at your logic for a second: John Mark Karr claims to have killed JonBenet. He did this ten years after the fact. The problem is that he was lying: he claimed to have drugged her when she had no drugs in her system and his DNA didn't match the DNA found in her underwear.
So he had nothing whatever to do with the case at all. Nada. He wasn't even charged. That means that any facts about him - who he is and what he was doing - have no bearing at all on the JonBenet case. This is just basic logic man.
I know. That's my point. I'm sorry I didn't explain it better and I'm sorry I called you an idiot. You sound sincere I've just seen so many shills.
So yes, John Mark Karr had absolutely nothing to do with the JonBenet murder. But TPTB running these Brownstone Operations had to get him out of Thailand and fast before he spilled the beans. And there's your evidence he's related to JonBenet. Yes he could have just been really cunning and smart but it's way too cunning and smart if you know what I mean. John Mark Karr is a pedophile coward. He doesn't have a cunning bone in his pathetic body. They couldn't kill him because he was in a Thai jail so they had to do the next best thing.
Thank you - no harm done. Hmmm - I obviously need to do some more reading about JMK's background. I remember him sipping champagne on a first class flight back to the US which was a bit off to say the least.
WHAT!!! (See mine and @DarkMath 's conversation, below)
JMK was "sipping champagne" on a "FIRST CLASS" flight back to the US? You're kidding. Where? Links!
This is getting more twisted with each year that goes by. I sort of always dismissed JMK as a creepy pedo mentally ill attention seeker, but now looking like something more sinister went on. This really needs a separate thread.
view the rest of the comments →
paulf ago
I have spent over a thousand hours researching JonBenet. There are some very misleading statements in this article. For example:
"Innuendo of sexual abuse began to circulate, though no evidence was ever found to prove these allegations."
Untrue by definition because JonBenet's medical records have never been released. Investigators have had no access at all to them. Even though at the autopsy the coroner observed evidence of external sexual trauma, the subject and content of her frequent visits to the doctor remain a mystery.
My own (quite well informed) opinion: it was impossible for any intruder to enter the house through the basement window. There is considerable evidence that it was her brother Burke that knocked her unconscious with a flashlight to the back of the head and either he or Patsy strangled her afterwards.
The JonBenet case has nothing to do with Pizzagate. Don't waste your time.
DarkMath ago
"or Patsy strangled her afterwards."
A mother murdered her daughter? That makes absolutely no sense at all and reminds me of the disinfo put out regarding the Madeleine McCann case.
I don't know who killed JonBenet but there sure seems like an awful lot of disinfo getting put out surrounding it. The most egregious is John Mark Karr's story. Karr was unquestionably part of some sort of Finders ring in Thailand procuring children to grease the gears of Brownstone Operations, of that there is no question. His "admission" very conveniently brought him back to the U.S. at a time when Thai authorities were more than willing to go digging.
Therefor by deduction we can easily say there's most definitely pedophilia involved in the JonBenet case. John Mark Karr did that himself. And "my own (quite well informed) opinion" after reading up on the sordid shit for the past 6 months leads me to believe the pedophilia we see was part of a larger Brownstone Operation.
And that my friend means you're either full of shit or a useful idiot. Sorry, I don't make the rules.
Q.E.D.
:-D
paulf ago
The two cases have nothing to do with each other.
Let's take a look at your logic for a second: John Mark Karr claims to have killed JonBenet. He did this ten years after the fact. The problem is that he was lying: he claimed to have drugged her when she had no drugs in her system and his DNA didn't match the DNA found in her underwear.
So he had nothing whatever to do with the case at all. Nada. He wasn't even charged. That means that any facts about him - who he is and what he was doing - have no bearing at all on the JonBenet case. This is just basic logic man.
DarkMath ago
"The problem is that he was lying:"
I know. That's my point. I'm sorry I didn't explain it better and I'm sorry I called you an idiot. You sound sincere I've just seen so many shills.
So yes, John Mark Karr had absolutely nothing to do with the JonBenet murder. But TPTB running these Brownstone Operations had to get him out of Thailand and fast before he spilled the beans. And there's your evidence he's related to JonBenet. Yes he could have just been really cunning and smart but it's way too cunning and smart if you know what I mean. John Mark Karr is a pedophile coward. He doesn't have a cunning bone in his pathetic body. They couldn't kill him because he was in a Thai jail so they had to do the next best thing.
paulf ago
Thank you - no harm done. Hmmm - I obviously need to do some more reading about JMK's background. I remember him sipping champagne on a first class flight back to the US which was a bit off to say the least.
millennial_vulcan ago
WHAT!!! (See mine and @DarkMath 's conversation, below)
JMK was "sipping champagne" on a "FIRST CLASS" flight back to the US? You're kidding. Where? Links!
This is getting more twisted with each year that goes by. I sort of always dismissed JMK as a creepy pedo mentally ill attention seeker, but now looking like something more sinister went on. This really needs a separate thread.
paulf ago
Chapter 29 of James Kolar's book Foreign Faction confirms Karr sipping champagne on his flight back.
millennial_vulcan ago
well I am speechless.