These guys are putting themselves out there, exposed calling out corrupt power and you desk jockeys are sitting behind computers and anonymous handles congratulating yourselves for picking apart inconsistencies that are bound to occur given the volume of reporting GW's been doing. It's like a modern day bill Billie lunch mob.
We're doing the right thing, calling out lies when they're told. They are simply filming a movie, and all these youtubers' shows they're going on, all these livestreams, are nothing more than footage to make a propaganda film that will be used to put all the blame on patsies, so that when the MSM finally covers pizzagate and Seth Rich, the population will be so confused they'll believe it's all the Awan's (or whomever they choose) fault...
Your presumption of GW's motives is...presumptuous. Anyone can say the same thing about your motives my motives, anyone's motives.
Tonight GW clearly laid out what he's heard from his European sources (with a grain of salt) about Mccabe and Comeys' plan to use KimDocom and Guccifer 1 and 2 to testify how Seth Rich didn't leak DNC emails. He gives fact based evidence for his claims. Maybe he is wrong...but calling out his motives reeks of paranoia and hubris and lowers your credibility. Inconsistencies don't reveal motive.
I worship no one. Webb's 'facts' are based on sources, as well as public records...like any journalist. This type of 'evidence' comes into play in the courtroom via witness testimony and submission of public records for verification and scrutiny. I am not saying Webb is right in his conclusions...but at the very least he raises a lot of questions for further investigation...and that is what he is after (open source crowd based public investigation). If you don't agree with his theories, fine focus elsewhere, but i take great umbrage with folks calling into question his motives as they post anonymously.
Also..citing sources that don't cite sources is not a fucking source. Use of public information that is completely circumstantial is not evidence. Okay..."Yeah..these two went to the same school at some point" is not dot connecting or evidence. He connects all his so called metadata and circumstantial crap with glue he just sprouts off from nowhere. The same schmuck will say on second.."i only care about metadata...testimony is no good to us" and then a video later talk about something he heard from someone that no one can verify as proof to his theory. If you cant see that...you're blind. Tell me how his precious metadata had him tell us that Seth Rich was killed via a CIA school play and the parents were actors...to Seth was taken to a hospital alive and transferred to have is organs harvested...to Seth arrived at the hospital brain dead and then was harvested...to Seth must be alive...to here is Seth's killer..an 18 street thug entrusted by the DNC to hire MS13 to kill Rich on behalf of Podesta to you know..make an example out of him...oh ...and the Awans...because they are in on everything..plus he throws the FBI in on it because of a mythical FBI bullet (which is complete bullshit). Explain to me how his verified metadata and info took him on such an incredible roller coaster ride. And don't tell me..he was just brainstorming...he was touting this crap as fact..often saying he was breaking the news for us all, declaring it a done deal...Ill wait.
Inconsistencies don't equal bad motives...fact based evidence for his theories. He is not a prosecutor, he is an investigative citizen journalism putting his neck on the line trying to piece it together like everyone else. He isn't smug or haughty about hi he presents...perhaps his inconsistencies occur because of new information. Anyway I don't appreciate everyone slamming him because his 'evidenc isn't fool proof' and there are inconsistencies in his theories
view the rest of the comments →
20Justice4All17 ago
These guys are putting themselves out there, exposed calling out corrupt power and you desk jockeys are sitting behind computers and anonymous handles congratulating yourselves for picking apart inconsistencies that are bound to occur given the volume of reporting GW's been doing. It's like a modern day bill Billie lunch mob.
V____Z ago
We're doing the right thing, calling out lies when they're told. They are simply filming a movie, and all these youtubers' shows they're going on, all these livestreams, are nothing more than footage to make a propaganda film that will be used to put all the blame on patsies, so that when the MSM finally covers pizzagate and Seth Rich, the population will be so confused they'll believe it's all the Awan's (or whomever they choose) fault...
20Justice4All17 ago
Your presumption of GW's motives is...presumptuous. Anyone can say the same thing about your motives my motives, anyone's motives.
Tonight GW clearly laid out what he's heard from his European sources (with a grain of salt) about Mccabe and Comeys' plan to use KimDocom and Guccifer 1 and 2 to testify how Seth Rich didn't leak DNC emails. He gives fact based evidence for his claims. Maybe he is wrong...but calling out his motives reeks of paranoia and hubris and lowers your credibility. Inconsistencies don't reveal motive.
Coco-Hamilton ago
What is this fact based evidence? I know his warped definition of metadata. What evidence? The Webb worshippers always say this and give nothing.
20Justice4All17 ago
I worship no one. Webb's 'facts' are based on sources, as well as public records...like any journalist. This type of 'evidence' comes into play in the courtroom via witness testimony and submission of public records for verification and scrutiny. I am not saying Webb is right in his conclusions...but at the very least he raises a lot of questions for further investigation...and that is what he is after (open source crowd based public investigation). If you don't agree with his theories, fine focus elsewhere, but i take great umbrage with folks calling into question his motives as they post anonymously.
Coco-Hamilton ago
Also..citing sources that don't cite sources is not a fucking source. Use of public information that is completely circumstantial is not evidence. Okay..."Yeah..these two went to the same school at some point" is not dot connecting or evidence. He connects all his so called metadata and circumstantial crap with glue he just sprouts off from nowhere. The same schmuck will say on second.."i only care about metadata...testimony is no good to us" and then a video later talk about something he heard from someone that no one can verify as proof to his theory. If you cant see that...you're blind. Tell me how his precious metadata had him tell us that Seth Rich was killed via a CIA school play and the parents were actors...to Seth was taken to a hospital alive and transferred to have is organs harvested...to Seth arrived at the hospital brain dead and then was harvested...to Seth must be alive...to here is Seth's killer..an 18 street thug entrusted by the DNC to hire MS13 to kill Rich on behalf of Podesta to you know..make an example out of him...oh ...and the Awans...because they are in on everything..plus he throws the FBI in on it because of a mythical FBI bullet (which is complete bullshit). Explain to me how his verified metadata and info took him on such an incredible roller coaster ride. And don't tell me..he was just brainstorming...he was touting this crap as fact..often saying he was breaking the news for us all, declaring it a done deal...Ill wait.
20Justice4All17 ago
Inconsistencies don't equal bad motives...fact based evidence for his theories. He is not a prosecutor, he is an investigative citizen journalism putting his neck on the line trying to piece it together like everyone else. He isn't smug or haughty about hi he presents...perhaps his inconsistencies occur because of new information. Anyway I don't appreciate everyone slamming him because his 'evidenc isn't fool proof' and there are inconsistencies in his theories