I'm not celebrating quite yet. Just checked Twitter and they're clueless. They're actually all talking about the Awan brothers, like this is it! We've figured it all out! That's thanks to the Webb op. No ones looking at the pedo perps anymore, just the predetermined Muslim patsies I imagine. I hope they can wake up, but the big channels have all given their support to Webb, and you now how egos can be. To turn around now would mean that they actually put in a few hours of research into this clown, and that they are able to admit they were had. I don't see either one happening.
No ones looking at the pedo perps anymore, just the predetermined Muslim patsies I imagine.
In that respect George's op was a success. Other channels pushing Webb are probably in the alphabet network. They all support each other. Unfortunately some familiar and well-liked faces are in that group. They're either complicit with GW or terrible researchers who don't even lurk here and spout anything for clicks.
HA Goodman said that the reason he had George on was because his good and trusted buddy Tim Black not only endorsed Webb, but they're buddies now, and Jason too. Tim and HA are not alphabet, but HA relied on Tim, which was a mistake, because Tim for whatever reason, allowed himself to be used by Webb, his platform used to host an interview with Mr Smile, and Tim laid back, belly up, and asked no questions, just was wowed by Webb's web. I blame laziness, and the fact that Webb has likely employed some sort of bot system, or a troll army, to run around recommending him for the past few months. You can see almost the same comment in every related video on youtube "You guys HAVE to follow George Webb! Have have to get him on your show!!". They are hounding Stephan Molyneau as we speak. But HA did not suspect that these weren't real followers, and fell for it.
The fact that he's going on Alex Jones says it ALL. Period, end of story.
There has never been any crossover between Bernie voters (Tim and HA's crowd), and Alex Jones. So I hope not to see "progressive" channels doing backflips today to justify why the guy they just endorsed is showing up on Jones' channel with Cernovich. I'm not holding my breath though.
Flash news alert. Molyneux has been on the Alex Jones Show more times than I recall. If you knew anything about Jones, you would have known this and thus would not have made that remark since according to you no one who associates with Jones can be trusted.
Your knowledge of Jones consists of devouring a few videos that were ordered up by Langley.
CIA agent Jones supports Julian Assange beyond question, to the point of openly criticizing Trump on this one point (since Trump has at several times expressed unfavorable opinions of Assange) while throwing everything else he has behind him in order to battle the Deep State, which is posturing to remove the President.
In addition, The CIA would dearly love to rendition Assange at Guantanamo, so why does CIA agent Jones go against his handlers (the CIA and/or Trump) so vociferously? And why is it that Trump dislikes Assange, and so does the CIA, and the CIA and Trump do not like each other, but Jones still defends Assange ferociously?
It's because you don't have a flying f****** clue about what your talking about. Your reasoning is so convoluted, it defies elucidation. And if the casual reader wants another recent example of how faulty your logic is, they will merely search my comments about Cynthia McKinny and duly note that you respect the ferocious and fearless McKinny when it suits you, but at other times think might also be CIA, because according to you, anyone who associates with Jones cannot be trusted. Do I need to cite your quote specifically where you say anyone who associates with Jones, like McKinny, is suspect?
Those same comments are also in the comment section of gatewaypundit, dailycaller, zerohedge, breitbart etc. Same wording. He definitely uses trolls or bots. Those women that comment on his YT hardly seem real, though after the Ms. Jackman fiasco I suspect a few are, most certainly are not.
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
I'm not celebrating quite yet. Just checked Twitter and they're clueless. They're actually all talking about the Awan brothers, like this is it! We've figured it all out! That's thanks to the Webb op. No ones looking at the pedo perps anymore, just the predetermined Muslim patsies I imagine. I hope they can wake up, but the big channels have all given their support to Webb, and you now how egos can be. To turn around now would mean that they actually put in a few hours of research into this clown, and that they are able to admit they were had. I don't see either one happening.
Yates ago
In that respect George's op was a success. Other channels pushing Webb are probably in the alphabet network. They all support each other. Unfortunately some familiar and well-liked faces are in that group. They're either complicit with GW or terrible researchers who don't even lurk here and spout anything for clicks.
V____Z ago
HA Goodman said that the reason he had George on was because his good and trusted buddy Tim Black not only endorsed Webb, but they're buddies now, and Jason too. Tim and HA are not alphabet, but HA relied on Tim, which was a mistake, because Tim for whatever reason, allowed himself to be used by Webb, his platform used to host an interview with Mr Smile, and Tim laid back, belly up, and asked no questions, just was wowed by Webb's web. I blame laziness, and the fact that Webb has likely employed some sort of bot system, or a troll army, to run around recommending him for the past few months. You can see almost the same comment in every related video on youtube "You guys HAVE to follow George Webb! Have have to get him on your show!!". They are hounding Stephan Molyneau as we speak. But HA did not suspect that these weren't real followers, and fell for it.
Here is an example. (7 followers) https://twitter.com/captndave55/status/870421788886528002
The fact that he's going on Alex Jones says it ALL. Period, end of story.
There has never been any crossover between Bernie voters (Tim and HA's crowd), and Alex Jones. So I hope not to see "progressive" channels doing backflips today to justify why the guy they just endorsed is showing up on Jones' channel with Cernovich. I'm not holding my breath though.
rwb2 ago
"They are hounding Stephan Molyneau as we speak."
Flash news alert. Molyneux has been on the Alex Jones Show more times than I recall. If you knew anything about Jones, you would have known this and thus would not have made that remark since according to you no one who associates with Jones can be trusted.
Your knowledge of Jones consists of devouring a few videos that were ordered up by Langley.
rwb2 ago
CIA agent Jones supports Julian Assange beyond question, to the point of openly criticizing Trump on this one point (since Trump has at several times expressed unfavorable opinions of Assange) while throwing everything else he has behind him in order to battle the Deep State, which is posturing to remove the President.
In addition, The CIA would dearly love to rendition Assange at Guantanamo, so why does CIA agent Jones go against his handlers (the CIA and/or Trump) so vociferously? And why is it that Trump dislikes Assange, and so does the CIA, and the CIA and Trump do not like each other, but Jones still defends Assange ferociously?
It's because you don't have a flying f****** clue about what your talking about. Your reasoning is so convoluted, it defies elucidation. And if the casual reader wants another recent example of how faulty your logic is, they will merely search my comments about Cynthia McKinny and duly note that you respect the ferocious and fearless McKinny when it suits you, but at other times think might also be CIA, because according to you, anyone who associates with Jones cannot be trusted. Do I need to cite your quote specifically where you say anyone who associates with Jones, like McKinny, is suspect?
Goodfella ago
Jones is mossad not cia although working closely with each other.
Yates ago
Those same comments are also in the comment section of gatewaypundit, dailycaller, zerohedge, breitbart etc. Same wording. He definitely uses trolls or bots. Those women that comment on his YT hardly seem real, though after the Ms. Jackman fiasco I suspect a few are, most certainly are not.
V____Z ago
they're all over twitter today, telling Trump and Hannity to have him over... and no one is questioning it or him, except for a few of us here.
Yates ago
The mods should have cracked down on his vids being spammed, it was clear early on he was a shill. This shit is fucked up.
V____Z ago
I told them months ago, but they said "we don't censor", let the group downvote it if it's bad. But if you're using bots to upvote you....