http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow/chapters/Chapter-13.pdf
Here's a few paragraphs ..
By Michael Swift, "Gay Revolutionary." Reprinted from The Congressional Record of the United States Congress. First printed in Gay Community News, February 15-21 1987
“We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.
“Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.....
So what do you all think? Is this satire ? Why is it recognized in the records of congress?
view the rest of the comments →
anonOpenPress ago
Who flagged this as a potential security risk and for what?
Well, here's an archived html version for anyone worried about that: http://archive.is/kUkA4
sensitive ago
I did. Links to PDF docs are a potential security risk.
anonOpenPress ago
All right, I actually didn't know. How are those a risk?
@cc1914 Maybe you should edit the post to have the html archive link only (so that the flair could be removed)
sensitive ago
Google "PDF security risk" ;-)
anonOpenPress ago
Done, seems to be reader related (possible bugs on the add-ons to open the file). I don't allow javascript so the "PDF phone-home capability" should be out of the question in my case. In overall, doesn't seem to be any more dangerous than other types of files (they all are, I guess)