Fellow Voaters had concerns when they heard this today:
Via our buddy @privatepizza: What the hell is this? I quote GW below talking about the alleged money laundering of organ business between Pakistan and the US. What the actual fk ? Is GW saying that the old business of taking the organs of condemned prisoners is much better???
I'm not trying to destroy the old business, it's the new business I'm taking about..... and I don't think anyone will watch this... eyes kinda glaze over when you talk about this...., no I don't want to bring down the entire network.
It's the new business which is reall really nasty. We've gone from taking the organs of condemned prisoners to all of a sudden shooting 7 year olds in the head and shooting two in Chicago to get the size and weight right for cardiac implants, and that's.... like I said.... if we just go back to the old business it would be much better. Because these things could collapse the whole network.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BDRRT2AcRUMYouTube
--- Timestamp from 6.00
view the rest of the comments →
DarkMath ago
"I'm not trying to destroy the old business, it's the new business I'm taking about."
I agree. That didn't make any sense to me either. In fact it was one of the most absurd statements I've ever heard in my life. It was like saying "Hey guys can we go back to stealing organs from people 18 and up only?".
It's fucking bizarre and I've been scratching my head all day. The only thing I can think of is he's being facetious and ironic. He's basically saying "Listen the gigs up, all of it. The organ harvesting story is out there and you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube so don't even try."
Make sense? If GW is being facetious then you can't bust his balls for making an inside joke to the Intelligence Community.
And here's a preemptive response to DonKeyhote & Co who will call me a faggot for saying what I just said: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Leyn-oS5ASI
Grow the fuck up.
:-D
rwb2 ago
I don't think your colorful language (found in other comments here) helps you in any way, but nonetheless, facetious was precisely the word that popped into my head as I watched the video. It's also the word I was groping for in another thread where Webb's comment that he doesn't want to see Podesta go to jail was the hot topic.
DarkMath ago
" he doesn't want to see Podesta go to jail"
Yeah that was sketchy but I think it was like the facetious thing. He was hinting that John Podesta should make a deal with Jeff Sessions so he doesn't have to go to jail.
rwb2 ago
I doubt it was that specific, because that is not remotely possible. It's one thing to make a deal when one is accused of certain crimes, but if Podesta was guilty of a fraction of which he is accused, the only deal Sessions could perhaps make is to have the sentence reduced from 200 years to say 150, which wouldn't help him much. I think Webb has a proclivity to speak facetiously, especially as time goes by. Mind you, it's a habit he should probably break.
DarkMath ago
" the only deal Sessions could perhaps make is to have the sentence reduced from 200 years to say 150"
That's all you think the Rothschilds are worth? Really? 50 years?
rwb2 ago
Why would the Rothschild's use their influence to keep JP out of the big house if or rather when he finds himself facing the prospect?
Silverlining ago
Perhaps he knows where a lot of bodies are buries - particularly if he was the one that buried them! Better to keep him on the inside pissing out of the tent.
DarkMath ago
I don't know. Good question.