You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

samhara ago

Part of the whole "Discredit the Truth" psy-op is to flood the population with so many fake events and lies that when actual truth is there, most people will be unable to recognize it.

How many people who are tagging GWS as fake, have pulled apart all the fake events / shootings et cetera.. ? No, they believe in Orlando and Bataclan, but think Webb is fake. They have yet to discover the "planes" on TV on "9/11" were digital artifacts, yet they claim they know GWS information is dis-info because he admits he's a Jew.

Yet GWS comes out with much more good info than that appears on this board. And I could make a list of that if I'm ever so moved.

They claim he's bad because he changes his viewpoints. That's when I realize no one here has actually done research? Because if they had they would know how the process works. They are just used to getting from "on High" i.e. knowledge from authority .

Is that why there is the emphasis on the undifferentiated "sources" here; in order to get one's post published and free from deletion? Is an article from the NYTimes a good source? I guess it would count as one here?

Also what is said among TVFakery researchers, FWIW, is

"why do they [ the perps ] keep on lying even when they might not have to?"

"Because unless it's a lie, no one will believe it"

In other words the population is so acclimated to lies; they wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the ass and stood right in front of them. And if the Perp Media told some little truth; they'd be called liars and would be disbelieved ; since the folks wouldn't know what it tasted like and would spit it out - as what's happening here with the GWS info / travelogue.

WEBre gave the keynote address at the Madison conference on "unacceptable" 9/11 theory; WEBre promotes "Galactic Federation" material.

Why did WEBre give a better speech on the subject than , could have, anyone else there?; Dr. Judy Wood, whatever?

!

Oh and Webre is connected to Alephanits and likely Podesta - does that mean his speech was bad at the 9/11 conference? No, not at all. It was very excellent

[However, You should witness the fellow now - freaking out about Trump and the Russians. psht. ]

Just because someone works for Intel doesn't mean all their work is bad; quite the contrary. [some here would use the example of "Jones" - "He's helped many people see the truth. blah blah blah"]

Because the best educated and most talented work for the State Apparatus

Unfortunately for them, the shills they send over here, though they may be good, have a limited palette since they are proffering lies and confusion to a board where most present are questioners and skeptics.

Also the Sophist - icated trickery is easily pulled apart once it's tagged.

People tag GWS as fake. Some of the tells which tag him as such, in their mind, are less than convincing to me.

Steele is a total fake, and many people here swear by him; same with "Jones"

GWS admits straight out he is getting info, much help, from the Mossad Network, and is himself Mossad.

Obviously these other "Truth Idols" also are working for someone, but as long as they don't admit it people can fool themselves into the delusion that the others are totally clean?

Consider this: Isn't it likely that without Institutional help our research will be ZIP in 50 years? or 500 ?

Does anyone here know how to start a movement which will be free from infiltration? Think about it: Those who created this site are unable to even create a BBS site free of that..!

seekingpeace ago

The planes on 9/11 were real! They were converted into drones.

samhara ago

no http://www.profitrolle.com/research.html

The more little details people *think they know , when they don't, the less likely it is for the true methods to be discovered. They hit us very hard. The man who wrote the research above died of fast , 2 - 3 weeks cancer, 7 years ago .

The mainstream "9/11 Truth" leaders are liars.