WARNING: George Webb will hurt all the hard work being done here if people keep posting his stuff as truth. I suggest people should post his stuff with a caution note. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by allconnected

I know there are a lot of GW fans on here and I think some amazing research has been uncovered. GW style of just claiming stuff as facts has the potential to not only hurt all the great investigative work done by his researchers in the last 200+ days, but also great work done here.

In last x days GW has claimed to have solved the murder of shannon gilbert in LI, the two teenage girls in iowa i think, Johnny Gosh and several others. Without any evidence he just spouts this is what happened and why and by whom.

Stuff like this should be enough to give anyone some pause. On Seth Rich he has been all over the place. Claiming he wad drugged, shot by the fbi, his organs were harvested etc. He claims SR was working with Jones, Ratner and Gavin from Wikileaks. He claims IC were monitoring Jones and Ratner and killed them because they were passing on info for WL. He claims that Gavin, Assange best friend, realized that Jones and Ratner had been ID, and so sent someone to meet with SR in person and get the information. Wait, what??? WL and Gavin were sending leaked info over the internet and only after Jones and Rattner are killed do they figure out communicating via the web is not safe. He claimed SR and Shaun lucas were friends. It was SR info that he gave to SL that led to DNC lawsuit. That SR was going to be the star witness. Finally, he talked to jared who filed the DNC suit. Jared basically told GW that they didn't even know SL and they just happen to use a process server that SL worked. You would think that would give GW some pause, but no he comes roaring back with fbi shot SR, fake parents signed docs agreeing to give up his organs, and Dr S did the harvesting.

GW claims that Robert Muller the special counsel has declared state secrets on SR case. He claims the FBi shot him, although today he suggested that was done through using a patsy. He claimed KimD and Guc2 were working for Donald Trump. He provides no evidence to back this up. He keeps going on about metadata but then just spews stuff. He pretends to have connections with IC around the world, but I think it is very suspect.

Today he did crazy videos saying he was about to be taken out. He was going to flee to the russian embassy. He claimed that a guy who was meeting him at his hotel had been intercepted, when the guy posted GW gave him the wrong address. Now he is driving around meeting with Jerome Corsi etc.

I think people need to exercise caution and think before endorsing GW theories as facts.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Bluebirdsolitude ago

I dont know what to think about him anymore. Kim Dotcom endorsed him this am. Assange endorsed Kim.

I'm just gonna ignore Webb. I know some of his info is good, but some of his info is obvious baloney. His antics today (didnt watch, just heard about....btw, if FBI wanted him dead, he would be dead, and what little I saw was ridiculous) anyway, his antics, coupled with disgusting Kathy Griffin makes me wonder from what "they" are trying to deflect....on what do they not want us to focus?

If the guy George named as killer turns out to be correct, then bless George.

If not, he is the scam artist we thought.

I just dont know anymore so I'm just setting George, and all his info, aside until he is proven wrong or proven right. Also, I dont follow Corsi, but wasnt he supposed to make some kind of bombshell announcement today?

V____Z ago

"Assange endorsed Kim"

They don't make it easy for us, do they? Assange is also a limited hangout. Remember, Dr Steve P outed him as such in his video about the intel agencies leaking to Wikileaks in order to defeat Hillary/soros. And seriously, he's not exactly married to the truth:

What about 9/11? "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/features/wanted-by-the-cia-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-14880073.html

YingYangMom ago

I'm not sure about this source. MSM are full of crap. They could have made this up, just like the "PG is fake" bullshit. Is there a video of Assange on video saying 911 is nothing but a conspiracy theory? For me, that would be a major red flag, especially because a year earlier, in 2009, Assange released about half a million text messages from pages which were sent on the day of the event, many of which contradicted the official narrative...

V____Z ago

The Telegraph isn't know for fake news. He said it. It's been out and articles reference this, both 911 blogger and Infowars, so if this was an egregious lie, Assange would have addressed it, or sued.

YingYangMom ago

He didn't say it on video and he didn't address the issue publicly. Why would Assange say that it's a conspiracy theory when it is precisely WL that has published the texts which contradict the official narrative? It would be kind of silly, wouldn't it? I tend to want to discredit it, because it has not been confirmed by Assange himself anywhere to date. And you bring up infowars here, but aren't you the one that says and believes that infowars and Alex Jones are CIA operatives? I'm confused.

V____Z ago

Please read my full comment in context - it was on Infowars, therefore he's likely aware that people have complained or brought it up, since that site is seen by many. I've never trusted Assange or Wikleaks either, they are limited hangouts. I love the leaks, but hate the limits. So we perhaps won't ever see eye to eye, and that's ok. I must admit you're the first person to ever claim he didn't actually say this. I kind of don't know where to go from there.

YingYangMom ago

I've never trusted Assange or Wikleaks either, they are limited hangouts. I love the leaks, but hate the limits.

WL and Assange have done more for humanity than any other group or intel agency. When I see hard, concrete, accurate facts and results like that, I have to be grateful and stand by whomever is responsible for bringing those out. And remember that If it wasn't for WL, Pizzagate would have never happened.

I must admit you're the first person to ever claim he didn't actually say this. I kind of don't know where to go from there.

Please read my comment again, I never claimed that he didn't say this. I said that I can't find a video of him saying it (before October 2016) and I don't think I can trust MSM 100% because they've lied so much in the past. And because of those facts, I tend to want to discredit the claim, especially because he did the exact opposite of what the MSM is "reporting", (he and WL have published half a million text messages sent on that day, which many go against the official narrative). I just ask for irrefutable proof that Assange actually said that 911 was a conspiracy theory. I might be wrong, of course, and if anyone can provide proof that he did, in fact, say it, than I'll be the first to denounce him for it. And I don't think that my stance on the issue is as isolated as you want to make it sound, either.