You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Pizzalawyer ago

I wonder what it was that Shawn Lucas could have testified about...did he play a bigger role other than serving the lawsuit on D.N.C.? Russian Times has an article on the total M.S.M. blackout surrounding this litigation. Based upon the recent Motion to Dismiss hearing, it is my opinion that the D.N.C. is going to lose that motion and the judge's order denying it will be lengthy and will send a shock wave throughout the political arena It will be interesting to see if M.S.M. ignores the judge's order as well.

xyz_3 ago

My understanding is that the DNC motion to dismiss was based on an argument of improper service and Shawn Lucas would have been in a position to testify since he served the suit at DNC HQ and the actual service was all documented on video and posted on the internet for all to see.

Pizzalawyer ago

I'm pretty sure they got past that point. I read the oral argument on the issue of whether the plaintiffs had stated a valid cause of action. The judge was with the Plaintiffs every step of the way, even bringing up points the lawyers failed to make. It should be a landmark decision. And I'll eat my law licence if I'm wrong washed down with a double martini.

xyz_3 ago

Then by all means keep us informed about how the lawsuit proceeds, since the MSM will bury it and it will fall to the alternative media to publicize whether any of the plaintiffs, plaintiff's attorneys or witnesses meet an untimely demise due to a trachea-crushing "workout accident", fentanyl overdose, "suicide" by defenestration, "heart attacked" or are found dead and washed up on Hollywood Beach with skull trauma.

Pizzalawyer ago

Will do.

xyz_3 ago

Thanks!