This is straight from one of the Podesta Emails: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15792
On December 19, 2015, a Hillary Campaign worker named Milia Fisher ([email protected]) transmitted to John Podesta ([email protected]) an article written by Amy Dacey, the former Chair of the DNC. In the article, Ms. Dacey reports that the DNC's data was accessed by Bernie supporters and some of the data was exported. THERE IS NO MENTION OF RUSSIANS OR PRESIDENT TRUMP. According to the CEO of the DNC (Amy Dacey), the data was stolen by one or more Bernie Sanders supporters.
The full text follows with the noteworthy parts in bold text (for added emphasis):
HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED WITH NGP VAN, THE SANDERS CAMPAIGN, AND THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN, And here are the steps we are taking to address the problem -- By AMY DACEY
The Democratic National Committee, through its software partner NGP VAN, provides tools for Democratic campaigns that are invaluable and second to none. This week, there was error with that system, however, which led to an incident involving the Sanders campaign.
We want to lay out exactly what happened so that people better understand why the DNC needed to suspend the Sanders campaign’s access to our system and how we’ve been working to fully resolve a serious problem — and get everyone back to work electing a Democrat to the White House in 2016.
On Wednesday morning, NGP VAN applied a new software patch to the DNC’s voter database system, and because of an error in the code, users were capable of accessing some limited, yet extremely valuable information belonging to other campaigns for a very brief window of time. Even though the glitch opened access, users still needed to take deliberate steps to seek out such information.
It’s important to make a few things clear from the start. At no point were donor records, financial information, or volunteer data exposed between campaigns. At no point was any data exposed to the public. With the correction of the glitch and further audits by NGP VAN, we are confident now that the data within the system is secure.
Once NGP VAN had taken steps to contain the glitch, the DNC directed NGP VAN to conduct a thorough analysis to:
-
Identify any users who may have accessed information from another campaign inappropriately,
-
Pinpoint exactly what actions any such users took in the system, and
-
Report these findings to the DNC so we would know what, if any, data was actually acquired.
As a result of this analysis, NGP VAN found that campaign staff on the Sanders campaign, including the campaign’s national data director, had accessed proprietary information about which voters were being targeted by the Clinton campaign — and in doing so violated their agreements with the DNC.
These staffers then saved this information in their personal folders on the system, and over the course of the next day, we learned that at least one staffer appeared to have generated reports and exported them from the system.
None of this is in dispute. It’s fully documented in the system logs. And these details reveal nothing less than a serious violation of the agreements governing the use of this data. Underscoring that fact is the point that the Sanders campaign has fired their national data director and indicated further disciplinary actions may be taken pending the results of their own investigation.
When we understood what initially happened, we asked the Sanders campaign to tell us who exactly accessed Hillary for America information, share their understanding of what data was accessed, describe what was done with that information, and detail how the campaign intended to discipline the staffers involved.
On Thursday, further NGP VAN analysis revealed that it was very likely that A USER HAD TAKEN DATA OUT OF THE SYSTEM DURING THE BREACH. [emphasis added] Upon learning that, the DNC had to suspend the Sanders campaign’s access to the voter file to ensure the integrity of the system. This action was not taken to punish the Sanders campaign — it was necessary to ensure that the Sanders campaign took appropriate steps to resolve the issue and wasn’t unfairly using another campaign’s data. This temporary suspension was well within the DNC’s authority. Moreover, the DNC was left with little choice in the matter when the Sanders campaign declined to respond in a timely manner to the requests for assistance with an investigation.
On Thursday, the Sanders campaign did move to fire its national data director. But we still weren’t provided the information we needed from the campaign until late in the evening on Friday. Once they complied with our prior request and provided documentation that we were then able to review, we immediately restored the Sanders campaign’s access to the voter file — as was always our intention and as we had advised well before they sued the Committee.
And the information obtained so far shows that the DNC’s concern to have a full, thorough inquiry was fully justified: As confirmed by the Sanders campaign in the account given the DNC Friday evening, one of the employees of the campaign involved in the misconduct tried to delete the notes they made recording their accessing of Clinton campaign data to hide his activities.
The next step is to continue to investigate the incident with the help of an independent auditor. This is necessary to confirm, as the Sanders campaign has assured us, that the data that was inappropriately accessed is no longer in possession of the Sanders campaign. The Sanders campaign has agreed to fully cooperate with the continuing DNC investigation of this breach.
The DNC has also instructed NGP VAN to conduct a review process of their internal procedures to identify how this mistake was allowed to happen and prevent further such mistakes. The DNC is currently beginning the process of securing an additional, independent audit by a data security firm of NGP VAN’s procedures.
We are glad that all parties are moving forward and that the candidates and Democrats can refocus on engaging voters to show how our party will continue growing the economy and keep Americans safe.
Amy K. Dacey is the CEO of the Democratic National Committee.
Milia Fisher (858) 395-1741
view the rest of the comments →
p0ssumsAlt ago
AMAZING FIND, FUCKING TOP NOTCH RESEARCH, well except this whole this has already been adjudicated, so to say. This was all about access to voter information:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/bernie-sanders-dnc-lawsuit-campaign-222659
And NONE of this has anything to do with the e-mails that were published on wiki-leaks.
SecondAmendment ago
I couldn't disagree with you more @p0ssumAlt, because a link to a "Politico" article is worthless. Where is the solid proof that this was about the theft of ONLY voter information? You have no proof. The two emails to which I linked include the following phrases (in the words of Dacey and Palmieri):
-- "users were capable of accessing some limited, yet extremely valuable information belonging to other campaigns"
-- "the glitch opened access"
-- "THE STAFFER THEY FIRED WASN'T EVEN THE PERSON INVOLVED IN ACCESSING THE MOST DATA."
Palmieri refers to it as "the data breach."
Neither Palmieri nor Dacey were specific about how much data (and what type) was stolen by the Bernie Bros. Nobody should believe anything that Politico says, because Politico is a mouthpiece for the very people trying to obfuscate, hide the truth, and confuse the low-information citizenry.
p0ssum ago
Of course, but you really can't prove me wrong, now can you? Feel free, show me your bestest google-fu.
And yet YOU do. Amazing, this whole thing went through a court of law, and EVERYONE on both sides missed this simple little detail, but YOU, YOU found it and cracked the whole case. Well done sherlock, well fucking done.
Silverlining ago
Even KEK is doubling down on SEIU http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/125699348#p125700024
p0ssum ago
Now THAT is quality proof.