You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

p0ssumsAlt ago

AMAZING FIND, FUCKING TOP NOTCH RESEARCH, well except this whole this has already been adjudicated, so to say. This was all about access to voter information:

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/bernie-sanders-dnc-lawsuit-campaign-222659

“The Sanders campaign never ‘stole’ any voter file data; the Sanders campaign never ‘exported’ any unauthorized voter file data; and the Sanders campaign certainly never had access to the Clinton campaign’s ‘strategic road map,’ the Sanders campaign said.

And NONE of this has anything to do with the e-mails that were published on wiki-leaks.

SecondAmendment ago

I couldn't disagree with you more @p0ssumAlt, because a link to a "Politico" article is worthless. Where is the solid proof that this was about the theft of ONLY voter information? You have no proof. The two emails to which I linked include the following phrases (in the words of Dacey and Palmieri):

-- "users were capable of accessing some limited, yet extremely valuable information belonging to other campaigns"

-- "the glitch opened access"

-- "THE STAFFER THEY FIRED WASN'T EVEN THE PERSON INVOLVED IN ACCESSING THE MOST DATA."

Palmieri refers to it as "the data breach."

Neither Palmieri nor Dacey were specific about how much data (and what type) was stolen by the Bernie Bros. Nobody should believe anything that Politico says, because Politico is a mouthpiece for the very people trying to obfuscate, hide the truth, and confuse the low-information citizenry.

p0ssum ago

I couldn't disagree with you more

Of course, but you really can't prove me wrong, now can you? Feel free, show me your bestest google-fu.

You have no proof.

And yet YOU do. Amazing, this whole thing went through a court of law, and EVERYONE on both sides missed this simple little detail, but YOU, YOU found it and cracked the whole case. Well done sherlock, well fucking done.

Silverlining ago

p0ssum ago

Now THAT is quality proof.