https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5252#efmAYZAbT
[email protected]
"Bonnie will be > Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and > almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in > that pool for sure."
She is the Asst. VP of Parmacy Services for Med Star-which is where Seth was taken!
http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Bonnie-Levin/1286466542
Found on glp:
"Listed and attending a fundraiser and providing a check in this one
Bonnie Levin [email protected] 1 attended under John Haber's money, she signed a check"
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32219
Thanking Mary & John Podesta
thanks for a wonderful evening
From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2015-02-16 01:20 Subject: thanks for a wonderful evening
M&J - tonight was terrific - food and wine the best; and the company even better. Thanks for including us. Definitely keep the pasta maker attachment! And Mary - dinner soon? possibly going to see Moshin Hamid at P&P on 2/26 at 7p. could do dinner before..
===================== Bonnie Levin, PharmD, MBA, AVP, Pharmacy Services, MedStar Health 410-772-6773 office | 240-472-7947 cell | 301-512-3696 fax [email protected]bonnie.levin@medstar.net MedStar Health is a not-for-profit, integrated healthcare delivery system, the largest in Maryland and the Washington, D.C., region. Nationally recognized for clinical quality in heart, orthopaedics, cancer and GI.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2844
So we now have:
2 members of medical personnel (Sava, Levin)
2 members of PR staff (Bauman, Palmieri)
1 member of Law Enforcement ( Heather Podesta)
Is that it so far?"
view the rest of the comments →
TheSadnessKills ago
I struggling with the idea that some of these emails really mean what people are assuming they mean.
The emails about the kids in the pool, for example, just really feels to me like playful or silly language.
Said another way, it would be like saying "The kids are surely going to love swimming in that pool, expect to be entertained!"
Entertained, as in, it is always quite a thing when the kids are around! Also, as in, "Please don't mind my obnoxious, rambunctious, wild kids!"
There are other TP emails that also just have a silly or social or familiar vibe between friends.
I believe that SRA is real and I also believe that there is SOMETHING very wrong happening overall, but there are too many of these emails that are being elevated to say "X", when in my mind, they may just truly be saying what they are saying, though in an awkward manner, perhaps.
The emails weren't composed for the World to see. Some were just communications between friends, for example. People into food, dining, entertaining, socializing.
When I text back and forth to my friends, there is often double-meaning, entendre and inside jokes. If people read them, they would think all sorts of things that are actually opposite of reality.
When I say to my friend: The bitches were in heat last night - it actually means NOTHING other than there were some cute girls at out local hang, for example.
But if one were to string together a year or two of out interplay and put them out there without context, it only looks like we are saying things that we aren't.
I'm just concerned that sometimes we're seeing what may not be anything at all, and perhaps not seeing what is there to be seen.
I very frequently have this sinking feeling about TP emails, not really meaning what PG'ers are implying.
JA and the Instagram and the bands, etc --- different story and TP creeps me out, but I just find some of this language casual and familiar between friends, etc. and some downright creepy.
Anyone else struggle with this?
Cigarette5mokingman ago
I definitely struggle with a lot of accepted "facts" around pizzagate, and I think you have you head screwed on correctly for questioning it. However, that email specifically, is just creepy. I could see where you're coming from as far as being playful among friends in a private email, but why is mentioning their ages necessary?
TheSadnessKills ago
That's a good question. Part of me would see it as suspicious and the other part of me would see it as part of making plans.
Commonly my friends with kids refer to their kids ages in conversation.
It is sort of like a "heads up" thing.
When someone says I'm going to bring my kids over, it is almost like the next question on people's minds: "How old are the kids?"
Why?
Because it tells the host what preparations, if any, may need to be made.
By saying the ages, it tells the host, in this case, don't worry, they are old enough to swim, for example and/or are self-sufficient in the context of being company.
They aren't infants or toddlers -- not need to child-proof the house.
That said, I'm not proving or even trying to prove this one way or the other, it just seems that many parents mention their kids ages all the time.
"I'm bringing my 9-year old." "My toddler." "My baby, etc."
Thanks for not flaming me.
I have a curious mind and curiosity for me is truth-seeking, however it lands.
Edit: By stating it also, parents are in some way "asking for permission to bring their kids", sort of "preparing the host" for what to expect and saying "don't mind the kids." The word "entertainment" may have been used as a way to soft-shoe the mayhem that will be caused by them being there.
"Oh yes, ahem, you'll be entertained! Don't say I didn't warn you!"
That's how the email "feels" to me.
If she were bringing three kids over to be molested, I suspect she might have just said, I'll bring them kids over later. Why spell it all out if that was really what she was saying?