To date, AFAIK, there has been NO positive confirmation as to WHICH hospital Seth Rich was taken to. Every report I can find says:
- THE hospital
- A hospital
- A LOCAL hospital
- some reports even refer to it as Seth Rich's hospital
- The DC Metropolitan Police Department Public Incident Report says: The decedent was transported to local area hospital and was pronounced by attending physician at 0557 hours.
I see comments here, on reddit, 4chan... seeking positive confirmation of THE hospital, and THE ambulance service.
I DON'T see any media reports that are - 1) seeking, or 2) questioning the lack of - positive confirmation.
Here's an example of a web site that suggests where he was taken for treatment, citing common sense:
BREAKING: Wikileaks Emails Ties The Podesta Brothers To The Doctor Who Oversaw Seth Rich Before He Died | Hidden Americans website | Posted on May 24, 2017 by Richard Saunders
Excerpt:
Seth Rich died after he was shot multiple times on the 2100 block of Flagler Place NW which is three blocks east of Howard University Hospital and six minutes away from MedStar Washington Hospital Center. The Washington D.C. police report says Seth Rich survived the initial shootings and died later at the hospital.
There have been no reports on which hospital he was taken to, but common sense indicates it would have had to been Medstar Washington Hospital Center.
Howard University Hospital is closer and has an emergency room, but not for trauma surgery so Seth Rich had to have been taken to MedStar Washington Hospital Center.
QUESTIONS:
-
Am I correct in saying that information about THE HOSPITAL where Rich was taken for treatment remains UNCONFIRMED? If so, why? To protect that hospital from harassment/something else? Is there some other reasonable explanation? Same questions apply to THE EMS/ambulance service.
-
Is postitive confirmation of the hospital important? If so, is anyone in the media asking for this information be made public? Are there any reports that explain, or even speculate, WHY the hospital hasn't been confirmed?
-
Are we 100% certain, beyond any doubt, that Seth Rich was taken to a hospital at all?
Make no mistake, I'm NOT questioning any research being done on Medstar WHC, Dr. Sava, etc. In fact, I think we need a whole lot MORE of it.
Note: This is 99% the same text as a comment I posted on this submission: Major 4chan thread is active right now with Anon who claims to work for One American News Network trying to prove DR. Sava was at the hospital the night Seth Rich died. On the recommendation that it be a thread of it’s own, here it is. Thanks @privatepizza.
view the rest of the comments →
privatepizza ago
Brilliant synopsis, excellent post. I noticed this too... always 'the hospital'. Super-strange. I don't know what we can do however... dig for a hospital when there's no mention of it? What can we do here?
carmencita ago
Here are a few articles that mention a hospital and anon: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2017/05/18/surgeon-at-seth-richs-hospital-says-his-wounds-were-not-fatal/http://hiddenamericans.com/politics/breaking-wikileaks-emails-ties-podesta-brothers-doctor-oversaw-seth-rich-died/http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Man-Shot-Killed-in-Northwest-DC-386316391.htmlNow, listen here is another think I came up on. The third link had a picture in the little video of the Flagler Market where those cameras were that filmed only the feet of the "attackers". I am going to also give a link here of a pic I found when just typing in Flagler Market and you can see those very cameras. Here. https://www.bing.com/search?q=Flagler+Market++++dc&form=PRUSEN&pc=U346&mkt=en-us&httpsmsn=1&refig=78b35121d13c4e4a8cb957853b6f4e00&sp=-1&pq=flagler+market+dc&sc=1-17&qs=n&sk=&cvid=78b35121d13c4e4a8cb957853b6f4e00The link is long for there are 5 pics included you will see the one with the cameras. I think this is very important. Also the third link has an article and a video of a really good reporter and he talked to Mary Rich on his call phone. Hope you look at these. Thanks.
privatepizza ago
Fantastic, @carmincita ! Going through them now, thanks so much for helping with this. I'll http://www.archive.is them too ; )
carmencita ago
:-) Still working on this. How can we not?
privatepizza ago
Flat out lol... We have to!
Silverlining ago
Aargh! Forgot to archive! I should probably have look at them too, now! I particularly liked the "Make calls, BECOME the media" by @lude
I feel tempted to just call the two hospitals and ask if they dealt with Seth Rich. Each conversation is a potential lead. They might even leak to v/pizzagate after you put the phone down if you mention the interest over here and how to follow it. And if half a dozen of us all phone asking the same question, telephonists are bored, telephonists are curious and people love to gossip.
What's the worst that can happen? [Yeah! I know - suicided]. Or they might say, "I can't tell you anything, but Dr Sava was the attending, do you want to put me through?
Definitely a chance to pop a red pill!
privatepizza ago
Really appreciate your help and mind on this Silver. It couldn't harm to ask, although isn't that client-confidential info?
Silverlining ago
I would think it public information whether a hospital treated someone or not.
You could also try to contact Jennifer Swift, [email protected] to contact [DNC employee fatally shot in Bloomingdale By] Madison Dudley and see if they remember why they corrected their article to "NOT" Howard University Hospital without stating the correct hospital.
equineluvr ago
Nope. For a hospital to reveal whether or not they treated someone is a violation of federal law, specifically HIPAA.
rooting4redpillers ago
I don't think that's necessarily entirely true (simply regarding whether they're there or not) although, specific medical info is protected. I looked into this a little and found some info, but a lawyer would surely understand these things in greater depth. For instance, what defines a loved one?
From: FAQ on Access to Patient Information by Friends and Family | ACLU 2017
From: Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute web site: 45 CFR 164.510 - Uses and disclosures requiring an opportunity for the individual to agree or to object.