I've lost track of the inconsistencies packed in a single paragraph. Technical details, on which I have no time or interest in expanding. The smoking gun being: "About 8 hours after he arrived..." The problem is that according to the existing police report, Seth Rich died 2 hours after being shot. The report could be of course wrong. Prove it. The supposed surgeon brings no evidence to dispute it. Besides, if some "low level doc" goes for such a high profile revelation, while perfectly aware that he probably will be identified, chances are he'd chose the visibility of FOX news or at least Alex Jones. Not some obscure anonymous reddit thread.
Fox seems to be in on it... and Alex Jones has been successfully labeled as a "crazy actor"... perhaps this "low level doc" knows that the information is best used in the citizen investigator circuit before blowing his load on TV and getting a permanent label of "fake news" peddler?
If that self proclaimed "doc" much delayed "confession" is true and he's an easily identifiable witness to a murder, it would have been much safer for him to go public with a maximum exposure / high profile revelation, rather than remain invisible and take the risk of being quietly disappeared. One of many indications that the sory is bogus. Either LARPing or deliberately muddying the water.
Let's be real... if a Dr was scheduled to show on FoxNews w/ a bombshell like this, they wouldn't touch it with a 100' pole... Look at rumors circulating re: Hannity being fired. For what? Dropping info that Kim Dotcom may have evidence that SR was the leaker? No shit. That was something most people already strongly suspected at the time and he may be getting canned... a top anchor.
Why would a major media outlet allow a Doc like this to go on air?
The fact that Alex Jones isn't putting the kind of work in that George Webb, and covering this stuff/this kind of interview is very disheartening. Just adding some support to your initial comment. As these "fringe" channels are where this kind of video/audio evidence should be captured and spread.
view the rest of the comments →
ArmedExorcist ago
False lead.
Cat_anon ago
Do you doubt the veracity of this fine doctor? If so, you're nothing more than a shill.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Do you like how we got downvoated for asking for an explanation?
Incredible.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Explain?
ArmedExorcist ago
I've lost track of the inconsistencies packed in a single paragraph. Technical details, on which I have no time or interest in expanding. The smoking gun being: "About 8 hours after he arrived..." The problem is that according to the existing police report, Seth Rich died 2 hours after being shot. The report could be of course wrong. Prove it. The supposed surgeon brings no evidence to dispute it. Besides, if some "low level doc" goes for such a high profile revelation, while perfectly aware that he probably will be identified, chances are he'd chose the visibility of FOX news or at least Alex Jones. Not some obscure anonymous reddit thread.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Fox seems to be in on it... and Alex Jones has been successfully labeled as a "crazy actor"... perhaps this "low level doc" knows that the information is best used in the citizen investigator circuit before blowing his load on TV and getting a permanent label of "fake news" peddler?
ArmedExorcist ago
If that self proclaimed "doc" much delayed "confession" is true and he's an easily identifiable witness to a murder, it would have been much safer for him to go public with a maximum exposure / high profile revelation, rather than remain invisible and take the risk of being quietly disappeared. One of many indications that the sory is bogus. Either LARPing or deliberately muddying the water.
SoSpricyHotDog ago
Let's be real... if a Dr was scheduled to show on FoxNews w/ a bombshell like this, they wouldn't touch it with a 100' pole... Look at rumors circulating re: Hannity being fired. For what? Dropping info that Kim Dotcom may have evidence that SR was the leaker? No shit. That was something most people already strongly suspected at the time and he may be getting canned... a top anchor.
Why would a major media outlet allow a Doc like this to go on air?
The fact that Alex Jones isn't putting the kind of work in that George Webb, and covering this stuff/this kind of interview is very disheartening. Just adding some support to your initial comment. As these "fringe" channels are where this kind of video/audio evidence should be captured and spread.