Seth Rich's case is central to #pizzagate. ANYTHING in that original Wikileaks email drop absolutely falls under this heading. Pedosta clearly states to make an example of whoever is leaking. Actually, now that I'm thinking about it ... HEY! A lightbulb just went on. This:
āIām Definitely For Making an Example of a Suspected Leaker'
Okay, if Pedosta thought the Russians were hacking into the DNC, why oh why, was he suggesting to make an example of the leaker? By his own words, he's saying that the leaking was coming from WITHIN the DNC and not from the outside.
And he didn't get any pushback on this. Nobody said, "We can't do that, Skippy, we can't get to the Russians." The fact that everyone was on board with this notion of the DNC having leak means everyone there knew it!
In one statement he ADMITS that there is a LEAKER and that its internal and that THEY ARE GOING 6 WAYS TO SUNDAY on him. how more incriminating can it be, in Podestas own words?
Shows motive and intent.
That alone is worth a criminal investigation of a normal person.
Absolutely, and it completely negates this false narrative. Sorry, but I never connected those words to contradicting the entire contrived story they advanced.
Further, it does bolster KimDotCom's assertion that Seth Rich had been working on this since 2014. It would mean that they knew they had mole, but didn't know who it was.
view the rest of the comments ā
quantokitty ago
Seth Rich's case is central to #pizzagate. ANYTHING in that original Wikileaks email drop absolutely falls under this heading. Pedosta clearly states to make an example of whoever is leaking. Actually, now that I'm thinking about it ... HEY! A lightbulb just went on. This:
Okay, if Pedosta thought the Russians were hacking into the DNC, why oh why, was he suggesting to make an example of the leaker? By his own words, he's saying that the leaking was coming from WITHIN the DNC and not from the outside.
And he didn't get any pushback on this. Nobody said, "We can't do that, Skippy, we can't get to the Russians." The fact that everyone was on board with this notion of the DNC having leak means everyone there knew it!
2impendingdoom ago
no shit, unless they hire only russians.
In one statement he ADMITS that there is a LEAKER and that its internal and that THEY ARE GOING 6 WAYS TO SUNDAY on him. how more incriminating can it be, in Podestas own words?
Shows motive and intent.
That alone is worth a criminal investigation of a normal person.
quantokitty ago
Absolutely, and it completely negates this false narrative. Sorry, but I never connected those words to contradicting the entire contrived story they advanced.
Further, it does bolster KimDotCom's assertion that Seth Rich had been working on this since 2014. It would mean that they knew they had mole, but didn't know who it was.
Commoner ago
You did good!!
quantokitty ago
Thanks! I appreciate it ...