You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

quantokitty ago

What does backing off the story "out of respect" for the family even mean? You mean trying to do what they haven't been doing in uncovering who killed their son is disrespectful? I'm getting tired of this. If someone is advancing lies and saying things that aren't true, yes, back off and don't spread gossip about a recently deceased man who was only trying to do good in the world ... but this? Not covering a story because it's political and political makes the family upset? No, that's not the way it works. However, if there isn't evidence yet ... or evidence that will be forthcoming .... and he's holding off until then, yes, I do understand that ...

Respect for the family ...

Are_we_sure ago

Not covering a story because it's political and political makes the family upset?

No. The family says there's zero evidence his death had to do with politics. People who are saying it was are spreading lies. These lies that his death was political do not help solve his murder and inflict pain on his family.

quantokitty ago

Yeah, but "his family" is saying this ... the family that wasn't at all upset about how the police weren't doing shit ... or how the doctors just let their son bleed to death. Then there's the dad wanting an autographed pic of the Cannibal Queen for Kelsey. There is not ZERO evidence. There is only zero evidence coming from the police because it's a botched robbery. Even in his online accounts that have been discovered, there's plenty of "evidence" that he was disgusted with the way things were going at DNC, something his parents also denied. if the parents had been proactive at the beginning with the shit job the police did and demanding an inquiry of the hospital as to what went wrong, I'd have more sympathy. And why didn't they demand to see the film of the body cams the police wore? Weren't they interested in hearing their son's last words? This whole thing stinks to high heavens!