This is follow up post to earlier post which I made, Titled: "PIZZAGATE FITS THE CRIMINAL TYPOLOGY OF A MULTI DIMENSIONAL CHILD SEX RING "

To my surprise, the submission received hardly any attention and worse yet was even downvoted by a few members, for reasons which are a mystery to me.

The original submission can be found here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1864045

And the educational reference materials here: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/149214NCJRS.pdf

I believe this post ought to have received a lot more attention than it did. To quote one of the commenters on the original post, Pizzalawywer, who I believe, does a wonderful job explaining as to why it ought to have gotten more attention.

Quote:

This post is very, very important because the behavioral analysis provides an authoritative label and definition to the phenomenon which Pizzagaters have been researching when they zero in on Alefantis, Podesta and company, much like having a "profile" for certain kind of criminals, a serial killer or kidnapper, etc. Here we have a "profile" for a particular kind of criminal enterprise. Up till now I've been relying on "pedo-subculture" to explain to others what has been found thus far since there have not yet been any discernable victims. But now we have an identifying label & definition to validate the researchers work product. This behavioral analysis approach also permits a more expansive definition of victims. Children at large are victims of the bands like Heavy Breathing playing at CPP. Caris Cummings/James is a victim when her photos are displayed to the public with sexuallly charged labels. Those 3 boys blindfolded before an alter are victims. Carole Greenwood's son was a victim. Alefantis' employee who didn't reveal his identity was a victim even though he was 19. NCMEC includes young adults as potential victims of sexual exploitation. Alefantis and Comet Ping Pong should have been investigated by the proper authorties last fall because researchers had already uncovered sufficient evidence that met the above criteria of a criminal enterprise. Good job HereticalPeasant.

Also additionally, if you take the time to read the literature which was originally shared, written by a former FBI Officer, Kenneth Lanning in cooperation with the Federal Bureau of Investigation: "Child Sex Rings: A Behavioral Analysis" , which is used as law enforcement education and training materials for criminal justice professionals handling cases of child sexual exploitation, Lanning states this in his preface, which further emphasizes the importance of the approach expressed in the above comment by Pizzalawyer.

Quote:

"In 1983 and 1984, when I first began to hear stories of what sounded like satanic or occult activity in connection with allegations of child sex rings (allegations that have since come to be re­ferred to most often as "ritual" child abuse), I tended to believe them. I had been dealing with bizarre, deviant behavior for many years and had long since realized that almost anything is pos­sible. Just when you think that you have heard it all, along comes another strange case. The idea that there are a few cunning, secretive individuals in positions of power somewhere in this country regularly killing a few people as part of some satanic ritual or ceremony and getting away with it is certainly within the realm of possibility…"

"I have devoted more than seven years part-­time, and eleven years full-time, of my profes­sional life to researching, training, and consulting in the area of the sexual victimization of children. The issues of child sexual abuse and exploitation are a big part of my professional life's work. I have no reason to deny their existence or nature. In fact, I have done everything I can to make people more aware of the problem. Some have even blamed me for helping to create the hysteria that has led to these bizarre allegations. I can accept no outside income and am paid the same salary by the FBI whether or not children are abused and exploited-and whether the number is one or one million. As someone deeply con­cerned about and professionally committed to the issue, I did not lightly question the allegations of hundreds of victims of child sexual abuse and exploitation..."

"The reason I have taken the position I have is not because I support or believe in "satanism/' but because I sincerely believe that my approach is the proper and most effective investigative strategy. I believe that my approach is in the best interest of victims of child sexual abuse. It would have been easy to sit back, as many have, and say nothing publicly about this controversy. I have spoken out and published on this issue because I am concerned about the credibility of the child sexual abuse issue and outraged that, in some cases, individuals are getting away with molest­ing children because we cannot prove the allega­tions of some people that these individuals are satanic devil worshipers who engage in brain­washing, human sacrifice, and cannibalism as part of a large conspiracy."

"We need to be concerned about the distribu­tion and publication of unsubstantiated allega­tions of bizarre sexual abuse. Information needs to be disseminated to encourage communication and research about the phenomena. The risks, however, of intervenor and victim "contagion" and public hysteria are potential negative aspects of such dissemination. Because of the highly emotional and often religious nature of this topic, there is a greater possibility that the spreading of information will result in a kind of self-fulfilling prophesy. If such extreme allegations are going to be disseminated to the general public, they must be presented in the context of being assessed and evaluated, at least, from the professional perspec­tive of the disserninator and, at best, also from the professional perspective of relevant others. This is what I will attempt to do in this discussion."

Now, having read that. I would love to get more feedback from members. What are your thoughts?