You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Aaronkin ago

First thank you for the time and effort and please don't let my comments discourage you. I have a problem understanding your logic about how "there can't be such a huge difference in the amount of pedophiles between states". Knowing that there are different types of child molesters and that some of those types like to band together in groups and that some types prefer to live in area were ease of access is high and will move to reside in such a location. Remember, ease of access can not be defined by population level alone. What do you use to support the assumption that percentage per population should be close to the same state to state? I do agree that greater efforts need to be employed in reporting and tracking these numbers and that there are uncountable cases of cover ups. Keep up the good work.

anonOpenPress ago

This is an important note, thanks. As stated in the conclusions, there are States where the same victims are used by several pedos (more organized crime) but even that doesn't manage to explain the difference in this scale (28 times more between the both ends of the list).

The amount of pedophilia (assumed close to similar) doesn't match with "percentage per population should be close to the same" (it shouldn't, noting the organized aspect). What would be required to believe that the data was accurate, would be that there's 28 pedophiles for one victim against 1 pedophile for one victim in each end, and I really don't think that's possible. The gap is simply too wide, indicating false reporting.

One indicator of false reporting is also presented in another comment /v/pizzagate/1857321/9094183