A few weeks back this lisping imbecile shows up on infowars claiming he's battling the Rothschilds. Yes Mike, you're battling the Rothschilds, that's why you're in cahoots with a man who is good friends with Lynn Forester de Rothschild. In fact it was Lynn Forester that introduced pedo lawyer Dershowitz to pedo financier Epstein back in 1997 as Dershowitz himself admitted (docket 363 page 3 section 6)
Further, Cernovich's attorneys were also part of this bullshit legal challenge in the Giuffre vs. Maxwell case, all of them pretending to be advocates of transparency when in reality they're sucking Alan Dershowitz's shrivelled pedo cock, trying to help him get sealed documents to harass a victim of child abuse. And guess who else appeared on infowars a few weeks back? Marc Randazza! Un-fucking-believable. Alex, I know you've got a lot on your plate but you need to get rid of these clowns, they are all scum, they all need to be purged. Tell whoever it is in the Trump administration that is leaking to Cernovich to stop. This guy is a steaming sack of shit and I haven't even mentioned his deeply creepy views on rape, which coming from a guy who was supposedly a victim of a false accusation are even more disturbing.
To everyone out there pursuing the truth, keep posting this stuff, keep exposing these creeps. We're going to beat these people, mark my words.
view the rest of the comments →
Poot_McGarvey ago
I'm pursuing the truth as well but I'm not so sure about all this.
In cahoots, colluding with, and all that seem mostly unsupported. I know that was the argument of the lawyers who argued against Cernovich's motion but I'm gonna need some actual thorough proof of this before I write him off.
I've questioned this myself recently and apart from the contentions of the lawyers who argued against his motion there isn't much if any evidence of being in cahoots with or colluding with Doucheawits.
Not against looking in to it but these conclusions, as they stand, are extremely weak. Also he seems to be doing good work and gaining momentum. Just my two cents. If you disagree I'd like to see some actual evidence.
Blondmyth ago
You've got to be fucking kidding. Cernovich wants to make public the same sealed court papers as Dershowitz. Cernovich sees Dershowitz as one of his main inspirations and is photographed with him. We've got Mike's attorneys brown-nosing Dershowitz on their blog. Hmmm, I wonder what could be going on????????? Are you sure you're pursuing the truth?
Poot_McGarvey ago
Source?
Source?
Not trying to refute you. If there is something to these claims I am more than curious.
Mrs_Ogynist01 ago
Here you go http://pizzagate.wiki/images/7/72/Response_in_Opposition_to_Motion_to_Intervene_-_by_Mike_Cernovich.pdf from the VICTIM's lawyer. Cernovich is working with Dershowitz.
Poot_McGarvey ago
Yeah I read most of that already.
It is plausible that the VICTIM's lawyer made the argument for procedural and stratgegic reasons to better serve their client. The fact that the lawyer made the argument that Cernovich's motion was for X purpose does not prove that the motion was for X purpose. Furthermore there is nothing I can see in this particular motion that proves that cernovich filed this motion with the intent of assisting doucheawits. Like I said before, I'm going to need some more context or evidence before reaching that conclusion apart from the contentions of the lawyer who argued against his motion.
And what I would really like is proof of the claim previously mentioned:
Where are you getting this from?
Mrs_Ogynist01 ago
https://porkinspolicyreview.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/intervenor-alan-dershowitz-memorandum-of-law-in-support-of-michael-cervnovich-motion-to-unseal.pdf
This court doc literally spells out that they are working together. You have two sides - Dershowitz or Virginia's. Cernovich is on Dershowitz. Plus throw in that Cernovich tried to claim Epstein was suing him when he was not. But believe what you will.