OK, I have resisted signing up for a long time, but I really need to say a couple things here.
Some of us will recall when Assange tweeted about troops showing up at the embassy he was at, and his subsequent disappearance. This occurred in response to him tweeting that he was about to release information that was going to get Hillary Clinton arrested, right after Hillary asked congress for permission to drone strike him. This event led to rumors of his death for a long time, as the world was asking for proof of life, but none was ever offered. After a very very long time, word came out that he had been detained for the purpose of going to trial over the "rape" charges, yet this supposed trial never actually took place, and after a while there were some news articles trying to establish that he had been proven still alive, even though the evidence was somewhat questionable.
I noticed on Wikileaks' Twitter around the same time, and in the news, all sorts of publicity about Wikileaks and how it was some ultra-reliable news source, and encouraging people to listen to Wikileaks only. Then, instead of releasing this damning Hillary info that was supposed to be released immediately, we got a bunch of leaks that had nothing to do with PG or Hillary at all. I remember a couple cases where the info coming out from Wikileaks seemed to be slyly supporting the left's arguments, even though JA was totally anti-Hillary and pro-Trump. JA has never been properly proven alive, and the lack of proof of life when it was asked for, and the subsequent explanation (about his trial) which also seems false now, seems to indicate that JA was in fact killed, and that Wikileaks is now under the control of the opposition.
Then let us consider this big thing about "#vault7", a bunch of irrelevant links about the CIA from a long time ago, but nothing that everyone was waiting for. Lots of hoopla about that, but zero substance.
This is the real reason why Trump said he wanted JA to stand trial. It is because he knows JA can never be produced to stand trial! The left killed him and took over his Twitter a long time ago.
What probably happened is, JA was kidnapped and tortured to reveal his dead man's switch. He soon gave up Gavin McFayden as the dead man's switch, so they killed McFayden a couple days later. There being no way to release JA safely, they definitely killed him, and then set about making up fake evidence to dispel the already-widespread rumors of his death.
Then you've got JA supposedly offering to hire James Comey (the same guy who failed to investigate all the Wikileaks-leaked emails)?! You guys really think JA wants to hire Comey to investigate the government, when he has failed to do so for years? Don't be naiive! Read what JA actually tweeted. You think this was meant as a joke? Seems pretty cut and dry to me. Imagine you didn't know about all this PG stuff, and ask yourself how you would read that post. This is what was said, exactly:
"WikiLeaks would be happy to consider hiring James Comey to help lead its DC office should he like to properly investigate the US government."
When Wikileaks and JA start saying things that go against what you know they believe, right after widespread (and plausible) rumors of JA's death and Wikileaks being taken over, you have to at least "suspect" that maybe JA really is dead.
First, believe the Assange comment re hiring Comey was a JOKE.
Second, the accusations of rape are baseless and in fact the women are saying that they were pressured
by police to bring charges against Assange which they didn't want to do.
Pretty much your summation is that Julian Assange may very well be dead and that this whole matter of Biden trip to London and what looked like an attack at the Embassy with some witnesses saying that Assange was taken out with a bag over his head may very well be true. We really don't know. And we need to continue to remind ourselves of that fact.
Assange's comments -- if they were his -- have to be a JOKE because I presume that Comey won't be left
out there on the streets to spill his guts -- and unlikely that he could offer enough assurances to those
concerned whose secrets he holds that they don't have to worry about his talking.
There are a lot of people going to Wikileaks these days who don't know anything but what the MSM has told them, and all of those people are going to view the Twitter comment and take it to mean that Wikileaks supports Comey. Is it normal for Wikileaks to plainly say one thing, but mean something completely different? In my experience that is unusual for them. Nobody could type that message and not know that it would be taken that way. Every single media article that has come out has flat out said that Wikileaks offered him a job:
view the rest of the comments →
jmac1112 ago
OK, I have resisted signing up for a long time, but I really need to say a couple things here.
Some of us will recall when Assange tweeted about troops showing up at the embassy he was at, and his subsequent disappearance. This occurred in response to him tweeting that he was about to release information that was going to get Hillary Clinton arrested, right after Hillary asked congress for permission to drone strike him. This event led to rumors of his death for a long time, as the world was asking for proof of life, but none was ever offered. After a very very long time, word came out that he had been detained for the purpose of going to trial over the "rape" charges, yet this supposed trial never actually took place, and after a while there were some news articles trying to establish that he had been proven still alive, even though the evidence was somewhat questionable.
I noticed on Wikileaks' Twitter around the same time, and in the news, all sorts of publicity about Wikileaks and how it was some ultra-reliable news source, and encouraging people to listen to Wikileaks only. Then, instead of releasing this damning Hillary info that was supposed to be released immediately, we got a bunch of leaks that had nothing to do with PG or Hillary at all. I remember a couple cases where the info coming out from Wikileaks seemed to be slyly supporting the left's arguments, even though JA was totally anti-Hillary and pro-Trump. JA has never been properly proven alive, and the lack of proof of life when it was asked for, and the subsequent explanation (about his trial) which also seems false now, seems to indicate that JA was in fact killed, and that Wikileaks is now under the control of the opposition.
Then let us consider this big thing about "#vault7", a bunch of irrelevant links about the CIA from a long time ago, but nothing that everyone was waiting for. Lots of hoopla about that, but zero substance.
This is the real reason why Trump said he wanted JA to stand trial. It is because he knows JA can never be produced to stand trial! The left killed him and took over his Twitter a long time ago.
What probably happened is, JA was kidnapped and tortured to reveal his dead man's switch. He soon gave up Gavin McFayden as the dead man's switch, so they killed McFayden a couple days later. There being no way to release JA safely, they definitely killed him, and then set about making up fake evidence to dispel the already-widespread rumors of his death.
Then you've got JA supposedly offering to hire James Comey (the same guy who failed to investigate all the Wikileaks-leaked emails)?! You guys really think JA wants to hire Comey to investigate the government, when he has failed to do so for years? Don't be naiive! Read what JA actually tweeted. You think this was meant as a joke? Seems pretty cut and dry to me. Imagine you didn't know about all this PG stuff, and ask yourself how you would read that post. This is what was said, exactly:
"WikiLeaks would be happy to consider hiring James Comey to help lead its DC office should he like to properly investigate the US government."
When Wikileaks and JA start saying things that go against what you know they believe, right after widespread (and plausible) rumors of JA's death and Wikileaks being taken over, you have to at least "suspect" that maybe JA really is dead.
Rest in Peace, Julian.
Votescam ago
First, believe the Assange comment re hiring Comey was a JOKE.
Second, the accusations of rape are baseless and in fact the women are saying that they were pressured by police to bring charges against Assange which they didn't want to do.
Pretty much your summation is that Julian Assange may very well be dead and that this whole matter of Biden trip to London and what looked like an attack at the Embassy with some witnesses saying that Assange was taken out with a bag over his head may very well be true. We really don't know. And we need to continue to remind ourselves of that fact.
Assange's comments -- if they were his -- have to be a JOKE because I presume that Comey won't be left out there on the streets to spill his guts -- and unlikely that he could offer enough assurances to those concerned whose secrets he holds that they don't have to worry about his talking.
jmac1112 ago
There are a lot of people going to Wikileaks these days who don't know anything but what the MSM has told them, and all of those people are going to view the Twitter comment and take it to mean that Wikileaks supports Comey. Is it normal for Wikileaks to plainly say one thing, but mean something completely different? In my experience that is unusual for them. Nobody could type that message and not know that it would be taken that way. Every single media article that has come out has flat out said that Wikileaks offered him a job:
http://heavy.com/news/2017/05/james-comey-fired-wikileaks-offers-to-hire-new-job-assange-dc-office-trump/ http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/09/wikileaks-offers-comey-a-new-job/ http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/05/hah-wikileaks-offers-hire-james-comey-firing/
Votescam ago
When it's a joke, it would be very likely. (Satire)