I've got a good question for you. I would ask why the US and UK governments -- who both have the ability to monitor every single internet-connected electronic device in their own countries, as well as much of the world and justify this mass surveillance and data collection under the guise of safety -- why are any child porn makers and and human traffickers still in operation at all?
From those who've been given much, MUCH will be expected.
Upvoat just worked "on the page" - no refresh needed 4-0 to 5-0 as I upvoated. If you could see who is up/down voating the system would be more transparent and trustworthy. @nana66
Also the recent FBI(?) sting operated a pedo site with 150,000 "members" but only 900 arrests/prosecutions. How so?
indeed. We know from Vault7 that the CIA has the ability - were it serious - to round up all pedo activity that has any online footprint. That they dont shows us they consider it part of their 'infrastructure'
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
I've got a good question for you. I would ask why the US and UK governments -- who both have the ability to monitor every single internet-connected electronic device in their own countries, as well as much of the world and justify this mass surveillance and data collection under the guise of safety -- why are any child porn makers and and human traffickers still in operation at all?
From those who've been given much, MUCH will be expected.
Silverlining ago
Upvoat just worked "on the page" - no refresh needed 4-0 to 5-0 as I upvoated. If you could see who is up/down voating the system would be more transparent and trustworthy. @nana66
Also the recent FBI(?) sting operated a pedo site with 150,000 "members" but only 900 arrests/prosecutions. How so?
MolochHunter ago
indeed. We know from Vault7 that the CIA has the ability - were it serious - to round up all pedo activity that has any online footprint. That they dont shows us they consider it part of their 'infrastructure'