Anyone from Noddy and Big Ears upwards who's listened to Becki's testimony knows she's telling the truth. She's obviously deeply traumatized, has no reason at all to lie and the details of her experiences match exactly with what we know about satanic ritual abuse.
I actually meant this voat account ' BP_Survivor'...don't think it is Becki. And, I'll keep my opinions on the authentic Becki Percy to myself for now.
Yes, I meant the voat account. That's not to say that I am fully endorsing Becki's story either..I'm reserving judgement on that for now as I have some concerns (not necessarily about Becki herself) but I think that the situation is a little more complicated than people realize.
I'm not yet weighing in with the truth/lie debate as to Bexki's testimony - but I am curious as to what parts of it you feel as convincing to you that she's "obviously deeply traumatised and has no reason to lie"? Just curious.
I find her report stunning, her body language strikes me as authentic-however such an alleged victim showing up at VOAT, who has not made any criminal report, or is supported by someone who is known to the community is cause for a pause-we surely wouldn't want to seem callous or unsupportive to a victim, but this is a high end discussion group, exposing the elite, and this community is under subversion by TPTB-stories must be vetted or they are just stories that often are used to discredit this investigation
Not this particular video by itself - I mean her testimony as a whole, starting with the one posted here a couple of months ago and then the subsequent followups.
Lots of things. I'm adopted and have a freemason and pedophile as close relatives. I have a forensics background, statement analysis training and professional counselling training. I've been chasing this sort of thing for twenty five years and I've heard a number of testimonies.
I can't detect any deception in anything she's said. Nothing. Her tone of voice, eye movements, speech patterns and genuine grief when reliving some of the traumatic events back up what she's said to the hilt. At 8:30 she unwittingly describes perfectly the process of dissociation that happens during a severely traumatic event. She describes details of rooms, rituals, objects and practices that ring true. She has insider knowledge of the UK's foster care system. She accuses her biological parents of murdering her sister.
Thanks for that. I didn't say I necessarily doubted or believed her. Just wondered what lay behind your certainty. I'm a forensic psychologist with a 15 year crime/law enforcement background. Before that I used to act for a living, so maybe I'm being devils advocate to myself?
Maybe. But scepticism is a must in this field. Read everything and believe nothing until you've thoroughly satisfied yourself of its reliability. But you already know that, being a lot more qualified than I am :)
I dont think any of us were appropriately 'qualified' to take in the amount of what we've learned in recent months. But yes, skepticism is healthy. Cheers
view the rest of the comments →
cantsleepawink ago
I would take this account with a pinch of salt.
paulf ago
Anyone from Noddy and Big Ears upwards who's listened to Becki's testimony knows she's telling the truth. She's obviously deeply traumatized, has no reason at all to lie and the details of her experiences match exactly with what we know about satanic ritual abuse.
cantsleepawink ago
I actually meant this voat account ' BP_Survivor'...don't think it is Becki. And, I'll keep my opinions on the authentic Becki Percy to myself for now.
paulf ago
Oh I see - thought you meant this account as in 'this story.'
cantsleepawink ago
Yes, I meant the voat account. That's not to say that I am fully endorsing Becki's story either..I'm reserving judgement on that for now as I have some concerns (not necessarily about Becki herself) but I think that the situation is a little more complicated than people realize.
sunajAeon ago
We don't know anything at all-the story/witness has not been verified
DerivaUK ago
I'm not yet weighing in with the truth/lie debate as to Bexki's testimony - but I am curious as to what parts of it you feel as convincing to you that she's "obviously deeply traumatised and has no reason to lie"? Just curious.
sunajAeon ago
I find her report stunning, her body language strikes me as authentic-however such an alleged victim showing up at VOAT, who has not made any criminal report, or is supported by someone who is known to the community is cause for a pause-we surely wouldn't want to seem callous or unsupportive to a victim, but this is a high end discussion group, exposing the elite, and this community is under subversion by TPTB-stories must be vetted or they are just stories that often are used to discredit this investigation
paulf ago
Not this particular video by itself - I mean her testimony as a whole, starting with the one posted here a couple of months ago and then the subsequent followups.
Start here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ga-mqtgpXSU
DerivaUK ago
I've seen them. I still ask what has you so convinced?
paulf ago
Lots of things. I'm adopted and have a freemason and pedophile as close relatives. I have a forensics background, statement analysis training and professional counselling training. I've been chasing this sort of thing for twenty five years and I've heard a number of testimonies.
I can't detect any deception in anything she's said. Nothing. Her tone of voice, eye movements, speech patterns and genuine grief when reliving some of the traumatic events back up what she's said to the hilt. At 8:30 she unwittingly describes perfectly the process of dissociation that happens during a severely traumatic event. She describes details of rooms, rituals, objects and practices that ring true. She has insider knowledge of the UK's foster care system. She accuses her biological parents of murdering her sister.
I'm not sure what it would take to convince you?
DerivaUK ago
Thanks for that. I didn't say I necessarily doubted or believed her. Just wondered what lay behind your certainty. I'm a forensic psychologist with a 15 year crime/law enforcement background. Before that I used to act for a living, so maybe I'm being devils advocate to myself?
paulf ago
Maybe. But scepticism is a must in this field. Read everything and believe nothing until you've thoroughly satisfied yourself of its reliability. But you already know that, being a lot more qualified than I am :)
DerivaUK ago
I dont think any of us were appropriately 'qualified' to take in the amount of what we've learned in recent months. But yes, skepticism is healthy. Cheers