"Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 22:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)"
To be honest, i don't think they're going to let anything be changed on that article, even by an old-timer. But they are in the habit of reverting all new editor's changes to anything even remotely controversial. Sorry about that. Your post here and changes on WP may have raised some awareness though, and maybe an established editor will pop up and give the article a go. Someone needs to do an RfC on the removal of the NYT bit, for starters. (See talk page for more)
view the rest of the comments →
formatist ago
Here are the spoils of my work, so far:
http://imgur.com/a/cwXkf
V____Z ago
Can you link us to the edit(s) they are referring to? Sounds like harassment to me, unless you were a jerk or something.
formatist ago
I simply removed 'debunked,' as well as the categories I listed below.
V____Z ago
To be honest, i don't think they're going to let anything be changed on that article, even by an old-timer. But they are in the habit of reverting all new editor's changes to anything even remotely controversial. Sorry about that. Your post here and changes on WP may have raised some awareness though, and maybe an established editor will pop up and give the article a go. Someone needs to do an RfC on the removal of the NYT bit, for starters. (See talk page for more)
jangles ago
Block chan