A forgery or plagiarism, by definition implies an original.
Explain why Bernard, the Dutch banker whose interview was posted on VOAT to great acclaim, urged us to read the Protocols?
Only Plagiarism implies an original. The forgery was implying this was written by the "Elders of Zion." It was not. The forgers plagiarized a great amount from a french work. That work was not about the Jews taking over the world, it was about Napoleon III. Other parts of the forgery stole from other places.
Why did the Dutch banker urge people to read it? Because it's a classic text for the clinically paranoid, hence the great acclaim. Anti-Semitic conspiracy theories go back hundreds of years before it's publication, it's part of a long a tradition. A tradition that a lot of pizzagaters are willing part of, hence the great acclaim again.
Always diversion, and strawman arguments, but never any dispute about the validity of the content or it's corroboration by those who "claim" to be Semitic.
view the rest of the comments →
RweSure ago
Yeah, this is a well known forgery. Plagiarized a good bit from other works.
Laskar ago
A forgery or plagiarism, by definition implies an original.
Explain why Bernard, the Dutch banker whose interview was posted on VOAT to great acclaim, urged us to read the Protocols?
RweSure ago
Only Plagiarism implies an original. The forgery was implying this was written by the "Elders of Zion." It was not. The forgers plagiarized a great amount from a french work. That work was not about the Jews taking over the world, it was about Napoleon III. Other parts of the forgery stole from other places.
Why did the Dutch banker urge people to read it? Because it's a classic text for the clinically paranoid, hence the great acclaim. Anti-Semitic conspiracy theories go back hundreds of years before it's publication, it's part of a long a tradition. A tradition that a lot of pizzagaters are willing part of, hence the great acclaim again.
Laskar ago
Always diversion, and strawman arguments, but never any dispute about the validity of the content or it's corroboration by those who "claim" to be Semitic.