No it's not. And it's testimony, but he does not give evidence - no names, no dates, no places. There ARE books worth of evidence on this forum and others, buried in trash posts. And very few bother to read it.
If you think this is the only evidence/best evidence we have, you have not been paying attention.
I agree it is tantalisingly incomplete. But the authorities don't seem interested in investigating. He's giving a public talk soon - more might fall out of that.
I have a feeling he might have been giving the interview to promote his bank and was led further than he intended - or, he seems a smart cookie he put out something controversial to attract coverage - or he was giving a "don't mess with me" message to people he has dirt on - or anything!
view the rest of the comments →
Silverlining ago
It is pretty much the key conclusive evidence we have. It needs to be seen far and wide.
throwaway345678 ago
No it's not. And it's testimony, but he does not give evidence - no names, no dates, no places. There ARE books worth of evidence on this forum and others, buried in trash posts. And very few bother to read it.
If you think this is the only evidence/best evidence we have, you have not been paying attention.
Silverlining ago
You had something to say and thought better of it?
There are hours of circumstantial evidence and testimony - someone needs to compress it all into a tweet.
throwaway345678 ago
My point is that there is a lot of evidence for pedogate. This video (unfortunately) is not evidence, it is personal testimony.
Evidence would be: Banker named x told me to kill children. Or
Financier Y was at a sex party with minors.
Or: An elite group comprised of these (x, y, z) members wants me killed.
Or, if he really gave a damn: "They are keeping kids in these (x, y, z) locations. Right now."
If he had this type of info he could have anonymously released it to the public (I understand the authorities are full of shit).
Or he could have been brave like Regina Louf in Dutroux and just told everything about everyone and taken the risk.
Silverlining ago
I agree it is tantalisingly incomplete. But the authorities don't seem interested in investigating. He's giving a public talk soon - more might fall out of that.
I have a feeling he might have been giving the interview to promote his bank and was led further than he intended - or, he seems a smart cookie he put out something controversial to attract coverage - or he was giving a "don't mess with me" message to people he has dirt on - or anything!