As many of you know, it is very likely that "fake news" was pushed by the fakestream media to discredit PizzaGate. Here are the Google Search Trends:
As can be seen from the above trends, it is clear that "fake news" and "pizzagate" arose at about the same time, and now appears that "pizzagate" is losing steam relative to "fake news". But after reading a message from @speepsie, there may be a possibility that the graphs are purposely edited by Google to make it seem like PizzaGate is losing steam.
So I decided to look at Google AdWords (Google's main advertising platform) to see what the actual search trends are; I say "actual" because in AdWords, Google is targeting Advertisers so they are less likely edit the results. Here is what I found:
From the graphs it is clear that the entire Google Search Trends is incredibly misleading. First off the relative jump in initial searches for PizzaGate was FAR higher than "fake news": 1.8 million vs. 0.5 million peaks.
And the current search trends for PizzaGate, while dropped off from their initial jump, are STILL higher than "fake news": 450 k vs. 368 k.
I am convinced that Google is actively editing the actual search trends because they want to make it seem like some fringe conspiracy.
What do you think?
view the rest of the comments →
AngB23 ago
I totally agree and just found info out HERE as well regarding possibly losing steam on upvoats on PG related threads. I wasn't aware voat was sold to REDDIT. If this is true, it could explain a lot about the shills, trolls and lack of upvoats, it appears PG related info is censored everywhere which is even more proof all of what we've researched and believe to be is true IS TRUE.
http://www.newscastnow.com/voat-sold-to-reddit/
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1827756
Vindicator ago
@AngB23 you are spreading LIKELY DISINFO
Does this not sound like satire to you? Has this been confirmed ANYWHERE that doesn't seem to be an Onion knockoff?
AngB23 ago
Spreading? I read it on a post that someone else posted in here. I only stay in a few subverses so I hardly spread anything. Sorry for the confusion & thank you for the clarification.
Vindicator ago
Sorry AngB, if that came on too strong. We've got a contingent that seizes any opportunity to push a fear-mongering, we're-doomed narrative to stir up distrust with rumors lacking evidence. It looked like you were part of that; my apologies. ☺
AngB23 ago
No problem I totally get it. It's just hard to keep track of who is really trying to help the kids and who is trolling. I guess I fell for the trolling and glad u let me know.