I'd like to see "important" or maybe even "new evidence" flair on this post. This email link has not been submitted here before.

I guess that Hillary Clinton must have ordered a background check on McFadden before having him as liaison, revealing his interest towards young females, so knowing about this in advance. This leads to an important question: Was Hillary Clinton protecting a pedophile?

"Police also note that on McFadden’s online posts, he claimed to be the “guru” of prostitution in Columbus, Ohio. He wrote reviews on prostitution services as well as advice on how not to get caught, reports NBC 4. source

NBC 4 has deleted the article (redirecting link) mentioned as a source above

Archive of that NBC 4 post is compromised as well, a snapshot was taken but...

http://www2.nbc4i.com/cmh/news/crime/article/dublin_man_sentenced_for_promoting_minor_as_prostitute/20489/ | 02:39:58 December 08, 2014

Got an HTTP 301 response at crawl time

I did find a quote of that NBC 4 article claiming he got ONLY 1 YEAR IN PRISON:

A former member of Governor Strickland’s cabinet soon will be headed to prison on charges related to prostitution.

Robert Eric McFadden was arrested Wednesday, Jan. 14, after police said he helped promote an online prostitution ring.

Columbus vice detectives said McFadden was the “guru” of Columbus prostitution and ran Web Sites that evaluated local prostitutes.

McFadden of Dublin was sentenced on two felony charges of compelling prostitution of a minor Thursday.

McFadden was sentenced to one year in prison after he pleaded guilty to the charges a month ago. He also must register as a Tier-II sexual offender for the next 25 years. source

Other main stream media has been - surprise surprise - all too silent on the whole case. We don't think an arrest of a liaison of a candidate would break into any news, right. Especially when related to one of the biggest global crimes, right. I claim that MSM was silent in purpose, some journalists there aware of the case, aware this would be worth publishing. But it wasn't. This leads to another important question: Was MSM protecting a pedophile?

Third, I would definitely expect a longer sentence than a year if I did something like this to a 17 years old girl. This leads to another question: Was the court protecting a pedophile?

All these three question are definitely worth investigating, hence, PIZZAGATE IS NOT DEBUNKED IN ANY MEAN. MSM has published false news on debunking, using all too narrow perspective. This is my claim as a journalist.