If this was my sub I wouldn't have way way more mods (they recently dumped like half and still a lot) than any other sub, who's only job is to look for excuses to delete content. I'd be finding ways to preserve anything that might in the slightest way be important....and when people post ideas and discussion posts I wouldn't make rules against them...also if possible and I'm pretty sure it is, I would remove the link post so people would only have the discuss link and ask them to include descriptions of what is in the links they paste. That's censorship free. There excuse when I inquired about the censorship was that all subs can make up their own rules.
Unfortunately people have tried creating other subs /v/pizzagatejournalism but they don't get much traffic. It seems to me very silly to delete thoughts, ideas and questions that very much are relevant to this investigation. It is done under the reasoning of some that it stops old, relevant, threads being buried - something in my opinion happened long long ago.
There is no archiving on here and evidence isn't being sorted and organised. Again, people have put lots of effort in and tried but there is no traffic to them.
As I have mentioned in other posts Pizzagate wiki is missing much vital, new and relevant information.
Think it is safe to say the deletion of the search bar was to try and put the brakes on this investigation. I know for me personally there are huge numbers of articles I can no longer find (I have only recently discovered the SAVE button. Sigh.). The suggested search site gives little to no results for PG searches and the T&C at the bottom of the page give me a sick feeling in my stomach.
We have masses of evidence and I think a collaborative effort needs to be made to piece it all together somewhere for a non red pilled, user friendly, audience. A better indexed wiki comes to mind. But I'm utter gash with technology. I used to be good with HTML. I think I'm past this!
Hi, I run searchvoat.co and it worries me to hear you're not finding the results you're looking for, and even more that the (kinda non-existent) T&C upsets you. I'd really like to hear about missing search results (there really shouldn't be any, so far as I am aware).
As for the T&C, well I'm just lazy I guess and didn't want to spend money on a proper lawyer to draw up a proper policy in the early days. I can see that could be an issue now that the site is getting more traffic. Meanwhile all I can do is "promise" that nothing shady is happening there. Personally I have little interest in pizzagate, my focus is programming. Let me know if I can answer any questions.
view the rest of the comments →
Bot117 ago
I think you may be right. i have watched them delete some really good information
Nana66 ago
If this was my sub I wouldn't have way way more mods (they recently dumped like half and still a lot) than any other sub, who's only job is to look for excuses to delete content. I'd be finding ways to preserve anything that might in the slightest way be important....and when people post ideas and discussion posts I wouldn't make rules against them...also if possible and I'm pretty sure it is, I would remove the link post so people would only have the discuss link and ask them to include descriptions of what is in the links they paste. That's censorship free. There excuse when I inquired about the censorship was that all subs can make up their own rules.
UnicornsAndSparkles ago
Unfortunately people have tried creating other subs /v/pizzagatejournalism but they don't get much traffic. It seems to me very silly to delete thoughts, ideas and questions that very much are relevant to this investigation. It is done under the reasoning of some that it stops old, relevant, threads being buried - something in my opinion happened long long ago.
There is no archiving on here and evidence isn't being sorted and organised. Again, people have put lots of effort in and tried but there is no traffic to them.
As I have mentioned in other posts Pizzagate wiki is missing much vital, new and relevant information.
Think it is safe to say the deletion of the search bar was to try and put the brakes on this investigation. I know for me personally there are huge numbers of articles I can no longer find (I have only recently discovered the SAVE button. Sigh.). The suggested search site gives little to no results for PG searches and the T&C at the bottom of the page give me a sick feeling in my stomach.
We have masses of evidence and I think a collaborative effort needs to be made to piece it all together somewhere for a non red pilled, user friendly, audience. A better indexed wiki comes to mind. But I'm utter gash with technology. I used to be good with HTML. I think I'm past this!
VoatSearch ago
Hi, I run searchvoat.co and it worries me to hear you're not finding the results you're looking for, and even more that the (kinda non-existent) T&C upsets you. I'd really like to hear about missing search results (there really shouldn't be any, so far as I am aware).
As for the T&C, well I'm just lazy I guess and didn't want to spend money on a proper lawyer to draw up a proper policy in the early days. I can see that could be an issue now that the site is getting more traffic. Meanwhile all I can do is "promise" that nothing shady is happening there. Personally I have little interest in pizzagate, my focus is programming. Let me know if I can answer any questions.