If this was my sub I wouldn't have way way more mods (they recently dumped like half and still a lot) than any other sub, who's only job is to look for excuses to delete content. I'd be finding ways to preserve anything that might in the slightest way be important....and when people post ideas and discussion posts I wouldn't make rules against them...also if possible and I'm pretty sure it is, I would remove the link post so people would only have the discuss link and ask them to include descriptions of what is in the links they paste. That's censorship free. There excuse when I inquired about the censorship was that all subs can make up their own rules.
Unfortunately people have tried creating other subs /v/pizzagatejournalism but they don't get much traffic. It seems to me very silly to delete thoughts, ideas and questions that very much are relevant to this investigation. It is done under the reasoning of some that it stops old, relevant, threads being buried - something in my opinion happened long long ago.
There is no archiving on here and evidence isn't being sorted and organised. Again, people have put lots of effort in and tried but there is no traffic to them.
As I have mentioned in other posts Pizzagate wiki is missing much vital, new and relevant information.
Think it is safe to say the deletion of the search bar was to try and put the brakes on this investigation. I know for me personally there are huge numbers of articles I can no longer find (I have only recently discovered the SAVE button. Sigh.). The suggested search site gives little to no results for PG searches and the T&C at the bottom of the page give me a sick feeling in my stomach.
We have masses of evidence and I think a collaborative effort needs to be made to piece it all together somewhere for a non red pilled, user friendly, audience. A better indexed wiki comes to mind. But I'm utter gash with technology. I used to be good with HTML. I think I'm past this!
some kind of mind mapping website would be helpful...the voat is controlled and not organised..
i placed a post saying that pizzagate is likely childsnuff gate ...and that is why there is a major push towards the lesser taboo of pedogate..
the admins removed that post within minutes
..but u can use this habit of admins to figure out what they dont want to come out
i think pizzagate should be called childsnuff gate or atleast coupled with it . and moved to a mind mapping web forum
one can use that forum togather with voat censor to rank info ...the more voat admin removes a topic the more releveant it would be ranked on the mind mapp
view the rest of the comments →
Bot117 ago
I think you may be right. i have watched them delete some really good information
Nana66 ago
If this was my sub I wouldn't have way way more mods (they recently dumped like half and still a lot) than any other sub, who's only job is to look for excuses to delete content. I'd be finding ways to preserve anything that might in the slightest way be important....and when people post ideas and discussion posts I wouldn't make rules against them...also if possible and I'm pretty sure it is, I would remove the link post so people would only have the discuss link and ask them to include descriptions of what is in the links they paste. That's censorship free. There excuse when I inquired about the censorship was that all subs can make up their own rules.
UnicornsAndSparkles ago
Unfortunately people have tried creating other subs /v/pizzagatejournalism but they don't get much traffic. It seems to me very silly to delete thoughts, ideas and questions that very much are relevant to this investigation. It is done under the reasoning of some that it stops old, relevant, threads being buried - something in my opinion happened long long ago.
There is no archiving on here and evidence isn't being sorted and organised. Again, people have put lots of effort in and tried but there is no traffic to them.
As I have mentioned in other posts Pizzagate wiki is missing much vital, new and relevant information.
Think it is safe to say the deletion of the search bar was to try and put the brakes on this investigation. I know for me personally there are huge numbers of articles I can no longer find (I have only recently discovered the SAVE button. Sigh.). The suggested search site gives little to no results for PG searches and the T&C at the bottom of the page give me a sick feeling in my stomach.
We have masses of evidence and I think a collaborative effort needs to be made to piece it all together somewhere for a non red pilled, user friendly, audience. A better indexed wiki comes to mind. But I'm utter gash with technology. I used to be good with HTML. I think I'm past this!
truthdemon ago
some kind of mind mapping website would be helpful...the voat is controlled and not organised.. i placed a post saying that pizzagate is likely childsnuff gate ...and that is why there is a major push towards the lesser taboo of pedogate.. the admins removed that post within minutes ..but u can use this habit of admins to figure out what they dont want to come out i think pizzagate should be called childsnuff gate or atleast coupled with it . and moved to a mind mapping web forum one can use that forum togather with voat censor to rank info ...the more voat admin removes a topic the more releveant it would be ranked on the mind mapp